Alina Herderich, Heribert H Freudenthaler, David Garcia
{"title":"从文本数据中揭示心理结构的计算方法。","authors":"Alina Herderich, Heribert H Freudenthaler, David Garcia","doi":"10.1037/met0000700","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>When starting to formalize psychological constructs, researchers traditionally rely on two distinct approaches: the quantitative approach, which defines constructs as part of a testable theory based on prior research and domain knowledge often deploying self-report questionnaires, or the qualitative approach, which gathers data mostly in the form of text and bases construct definitions on exploratory analyses. Quantitative research might lead to an incomplete understanding of the construct, while qualitative research is limited due to challenges in the systematic data processing, especially at large scale. We present a new computational method that combines the comprehensiveness of qualitative research and the scalability of quantitative analyses to define psychological constructs from semistructured text data. Based on structured questions, participants are prompted to generate sentences reflecting instances of the construct of interest. We apply computational methods to calculate embeddings as numerical representations of the sentences, which we then run through a clustering algorithm to arrive at groupings of sentences as psychologically relevant classes. The method includes steps for the measurement and correction of bias introduced by the data generation, and the assessment of cluster validity according to human judgment. We demonstrate the applicability of our method on an example from emotion regulation. Based on short descriptions of emotion regulation attempts collected through an open-ended situational judgment test, we use our method to derive classes of emotion regulation strategies. Our approach shows how machine learning and psychology can be combined to provide new perspectives on the conceptualization of psychological processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20782,"journal":{"name":"Psychological methods","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A computational method to reveal psychological constructs from text data.\",\"authors\":\"Alina Herderich, Heribert H Freudenthaler, David Garcia\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/met0000700\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>When starting to formalize psychological constructs, researchers traditionally rely on two distinct approaches: the quantitative approach, which defines constructs as part of a testable theory based on prior research and domain knowledge often deploying self-report questionnaires, or the qualitative approach, which gathers data mostly in the form of text and bases construct definitions on exploratory analyses. Quantitative research might lead to an incomplete understanding of the construct, while qualitative research is limited due to challenges in the systematic data processing, especially at large scale. We present a new computational method that combines the comprehensiveness of qualitative research and the scalability of quantitative analyses to define psychological constructs from semistructured text data. Based on structured questions, participants are prompted to generate sentences reflecting instances of the construct of interest. We apply computational methods to calculate embeddings as numerical representations of the sentences, which we then run through a clustering algorithm to arrive at groupings of sentences as psychologically relevant classes. The method includes steps for the measurement and correction of bias introduced by the data generation, and the assessment of cluster validity according to human judgment. We demonstrate the applicability of our method on an example from emotion regulation. Based on short descriptions of emotion regulation attempts collected through an open-ended situational judgment test, we use our method to derive classes of emotion regulation strategies. Our approach shows how machine learning and psychology can be combined to provide new perspectives on the conceptualization of psychological processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychological methods\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychological methods\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000700\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological methods","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/met0000700","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在开始正式确定心理建构时,研究人员传统上依赖于两种不同的方法:定量方法,即根据先前的研究和领域知识,将建构定义为可检验理论的一部分,通常采用自我报告问卷;或定性方法,即主要以文本形式收集数据,并将建构定义建立在探索性分析的基础上。定量研究可能会导致对构建的不完整理解,而定性研究则由于系统化数据处理(尤其是大规模数据处理)方面的挑战而受到限制。我们提出了一种新的计算方法,它结合了定性研究的全面性和定量分析的可扩展性,可从半结构化文本数据中定义心理结构。在结构化问题的基础上,我们会提示参与者生成反映相关结构实例的句子。我们采用计算方法计算句子的数字表示嵌入,然后通过聚类算法对句子进行分组,得出与心理相关的类别。该方法包括测量和纠正数据生成过程中引入的偏差,以及根据人工判断评估聚类有效性的步骤。我们以情绪调节为例,演示了该方法的适用性。基于通过开放式情境判断测试收集到的情绪调节尝试的简短描述,我们使用我们的方法得出了情绪调节策略的类别。我们的方法展示了如何将机器学习与心理学相结合,为心理过程的概念化提供新的视角。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
A computational method to reveal psychological constructs from text data.
When starting to formalize psychological constructs, researchers traditionally rely on two distinct approaches: the quantitative approach, which defines constructs as part of a testable theory based on prior research and domain knowledge often deploying self-report questionnaires, or the qualitative approach, which gathers data mostly in the form of text and bases construct definitions on exploratory analyses. Quantitative research might lead to an incomplete understanding of the construct, while qualitative research is limited due to challenges in the systematic data processing, especially at large scale. We present a new computational method that combines the comprehensiveness of qualitative research and the scalability of quantitative analyses to define psychological constructs from semistructured text data. Based on structured questions, participants are prompted to generate sentences reflecting instances of the construct of interest. We apply computational methods to calculate embeddings as numerical representations of the sentences, which we then run through a clustering algorithm to arrive at groupings of sentences as psychologically relevant classes. The method includes steps for the measurement and correction of bias introduced by the data generation, and the assessment of cluster validity according to human judgment. We demonstrate the applicability of our method on an example from emotion regulation. Based on short descriptions of emotion regulation attempts collected through an open-ended situational judgment test, we use our method to derive classes of emotion regulation strategies. Our approach shows how machine learning and psychology can be combined to provide new perspectives on the conceptualization of psychological processes. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
期刊介绍:
Psychological Methods is devoted to the development and dissemination of methods for collecting, analyzing, understanding, and interpreting psychological data. Its purpose is the dissemination of innovations in research design, measurement, methodology, and quantitative and qualitative analysis to the psychological community; its further purpose is to promote effective communication about related substantive and methodological issues. The audience is expected to be diverse and to include those who develop new procedures, those who are responsible for undergraduate and graduate training in design, measurement, and statistics, as well as those who employ those procedures in research.