孕期降压治疗对产后血压控制的影响

IF 8.3 2区 材料科学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Samantha L Martin, Hui-Chien Kuo, Kim Boggess, Lorraine Dugoff, Baha Sibai, Kirsten Lawrence, Brenna L Hughes, Joseph Bell, Kjersti Aagaard, Kelly S Gibson, David M Haas, Lauren Plante, Torri D Metz, Brian M Casey, Sean Esplin, Sherri Longo, Matthew Hoffman, George R Saade, Janelle Foroutan, Methodius G Tuuli, Michelle Y Owens, Hyagriv N Simhan, Heather A Frey, Todd Rosen, Anna Palatnik, Susan Baker, Phyllis August, Uma M Reddy, Wendy Kinzler, Emily J Su, Iris Krishna, Nicki Nguyen, Mary E Norton, Daniel Skupski, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Dotun Ogunyemi, Zorina S Galis, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Suzanne Oparil, Ronald Librizzi, Leonardo Pereira, Everett F Magann, Mounira Habli, Shauna Williams, Giancarlo Mari, Gabriella Pridjian, David S McKenna, Marc Parrish, Eugene Chang, Sarah Osmundson, JoAnne Quinones, Erika Werner, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T N Tita
{"title":"孕期降压治疗对产后血压控制的影响","authors":"Samantha L Martin, Hui-Chien Kuo, Kim Boggess, Lorraine Dugoff, Baha Sibai, Kirsten Lawrence, Brenna L Hughes, Joseph Bell, Kjersti Aagaard, Kelly S Gibson, David M Haas, Lauren Plante, Torri D Metz, Brian M Casey, Sean Esplin, Sherri Longo, Matthew Hoffman, George R Saade, Janelle Foroutan, Methodius G Tuuli, Michelle Y Owens, Hyagriv N Simhan, Heather A Frey, Todd Rosen, Anna Palatnik, Susan Baker, Phyllis August, Uma M Reddy, Wendy Kinzler, Emily J Su, Iris Krishna, Nicki Nguyen, Mary E Norton, Daniel Skupski, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Dotun Ogunyemi, Zorina S Galis, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Suzanne Oparil, Ronald Librizzi, Leonardo Pereira, Everett F Magann, Mounira Habli, Shauna Williams, Giancarlo Mari, Gabriella Pridjian, David S McKenna, Marc Parrish, Eugene Chang, Sarah Osmundson, JoAnne Quinones, Erika Werner, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T N Tita","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare differences in postpartum blood pressure (BP) control (BP below 140/90 mm Hg) for participants with hypertension randomized to receive antihypertensive treatment compared with no treatment during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (The CHAP [Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy] trial). Pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension (BP below 160/105 mm Hg) were randomized into two groups: active (antihypertensive treatment) or control (no treatment unless severe hypertension, BP 160/105 mm Hg or higher). Study outcomes were BP control below 140/90 mm Hg (primary) and medication nonadherence based on a composite score threshold (secondary) at the 6-week postpartum follow-up visit. Participants without follow-up BP measurements were excluded from analysis of the BP control outcome. Participants without health care professional-prescribed antihypertensives at delivery were excluded from the analysis of the adherence outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,408 participants, 1,684 (864 active, 820 control) were included in the analysis. A greater percentage of participants in the active group achieved BP control (56.7% vs 51.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% CI, 1.00-1.48) than in the control group. Postpartum antihypertensive prescription was higher in the active group (81.7% vs 58.4%, P <.001), and nonadherence did not differ significantly between groups (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.64-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antihypertensive treatment of mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy was associated with better BP control below 140/90 mm Hg in the immediate postpartum period.</p>","PeriodicalId":5,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy During Pregnancy on Postpartum Blood Pressure Control.\",\"authors\":\"Samantha L Martin, Hui-Chien Kuo, Kim Boggess, Lorraine Dugoff, Baha Sibai, Kirsten Lawrence, Brenna L Hughes, Joseph Bell, Kjersti Aagaard, Kelly S Gibson, David M Haas, Lauren Plante, Torri D Metz, Brian M Casey, Sean Esplin, Sherri Longo, Matthew Hoffman, George R Saade, Janelle Foroutan, Methodius G Tuuli, Michelle Y Owens, Hyagriv N Simhan, Heather A Frey, Todd Rosen, Anna Palatnik, Susan Baker, Phyllis August, Uma M Reddy, Wendy Kinzler, Emily J Su, Iris Krishna, Nicki Nguyen, Mary E Norton, Daniel Skupski, Yasser Y El-Sayed, Dotun Ogunyemi, Zorina S Galis, Namasivayam Ambalavanan, Suzanne Oparil, Ronald Librizzi, Leonardo Pereira, Everett F Magann, Mounira Habli, Shauna Williams, Giancarlo Mari, Gabriella Pridjian, David S McKenna, Marc Parrish, Eugene Chang, Sarah Osmundson, JoAnne Quinones, Erika Werner, Jeff M Szychowski, Alan T N Tita\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare differences in postpartum blood pressure (BP) control (BP below 140/90 mm Hg) for participants with hypertension randomized to receive antihypertensive treatment compared with no treatment during pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (The CHAP [Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy] trial). Pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension (BP below 160/105 mm Hg) were randomized into two groups: active (antihypertensive treatment) or control (no treatment unless severe hypertension, BP 160/105 mm Hg or higher). Study outcomes were BP control below 140/90 mm Hg (primary) and medication nonadherence based on a composite score threshold (secondary) at the 6-week postpartum follow-up visit. Participants without follow-up BP measurements were excluded from analysis of the BP control outcome. Participants without health care professional-prescribed antihypertensives at delivery were excluded from the analysis of the adherence outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2,408 participants, 1,684 (864 active, 820 control) were included in the analysis. A greater percentage of participants in the active group achieved BP control (56.7% vs 51.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% CI, 1.00-1.48) than in the control group. Postpartum antihypertensive prescription was higher in the active group (81.7% vs 58.4%, P <.001), and nonadherence did not differ significantly between groups (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.64-1.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Antihypertensive treatment of mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy was associated with better BP control below 140/90 mm Hg in the immediate postpartum period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":5,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005715\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的比较随机接受降压治疗的高血压患者与孕期未接受治疗的患者在产后血压控制(血压低于 140/90 mm Hg)方面的差异:本研究是对一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验(CHAP[慢性高血压与妊娠]试验)的二次分析。患有轻度慢性高血压(血压低于 160/105 mm Hg)的孕妇被随机分为两组:积极组(抗高血压治疗)或对照组(除非严重高血压,血压为 160/105 mm Hg 或更高)。研究结果为血压控制在 140/90 mm Hg 以下(主要结果)和产后 6 周随访时根据综合评分阈值得出的药物治疗不依从性(次要结果)。在分析血压控制结果时,未进行随访血压测量的参与者被排除在外。在分析依从性结果时,不包括分娩时没有医护人员开具降压药处方的参与者。多变量逻辑回归用于调整潜在的混杂因素:在 2,408 名参与者中,1,684 人(864 名积极参与者,820 名对照组参与者)被纳入分析。与对照组相比,积极治疗组达到血压控制的比例更高(56.7% vs 51.5%;调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.22,95% CI,1.00-1.48)。积极治疗组的产后抗高血压处方率更高(81.7% 对 58.4%):妊娠期轻度慢性高血压的降压治疗与产后血压更好地控制在 140/90 mm Hg 以下有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy During Pregnancy on Postpartum Blood Pressure Control.

Objective: To compare differences in postpartum blood pressure (BP) control (BP below 140/90 mm Hg) for participants with hypertension randomized to receive antihypertensive treatment compared with no treatment during pregnancy.

Methods: This study was a planned secondary analysis of a multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial (The CHAP [Chronic Hypertension and Pregnancy] trial). Pregnant participants with mild chronic hypertension (BP below 160/105 mm Hg) were randomized into two groups: active (antihypertensive treatment) or control (no treatment unless severe hypertension, BP 160/105 mm Hg or higher). Study outcomes were BP control below 140/90 mm Hg (primary) and medication nonadherence based on a composite score threshold (secondary) at the 6-week postpartum follow-up visit. Participants without follow-up BP measurements were excluded from analysis of the BP control outcome. Participants without health care professional-prescribed antihypertensives at delivery were excluded from the analysis of the adherence outcome. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for potential confounders.

Results: Of 2,408 participants, 1,684 (864 active, 820 control) were included in the analysis. A greater percentage of participants in the active group achieved BP control (56.7% vs 51.5%; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.22, 95% CI, 1.00-1.48) than in the control group. Postpartum antihypertensive prescription was higher in the active group (81.7% vs 58.4%, P <.001), and nonadherence did not differ significantly between groups (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.64-1.03).

Conclusion: Antihypertensive treatment of mild chronic hypertension during pregnancy was associated with better BP control below 140/90 mm Hg in the immediate postpartum period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces
ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.30%
发文量
4978
审稿时长
1.8 months
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces is a leading interdisciplinary journal that brings together chemists, engineers, physicists, and biologists to explore the development and utilization of newly-discovered materials and interfacial processes for specific applications. Our journal has experienced remarkable growth since its establishment in 2009, both in terms of the number of articles published and the impact of the research showcased. We are proud to foster a truly global community, with the majority of published articles originating from outside the United States, reflecting the rapid growth of applied research worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信