急性神经血管护理中的机器人辅助经颅多普勒监测:可行性和安全性研究

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-19 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02121-z
Alvise Fattorello Salimbeni, Caterina Kulyk, Francesco Favruzzo, Ludovica De Rosa, Federica Viaro, Alessio Pieroni, Stefano Mozzetta, Milan R Vosko, Claudio Baracchini
{"title":"急性神经血管护理中的机器人辅助经颅多普勒监测:可行性和安全性研究","authors":"Alvise Fattorello Salimbeni, Caterina Kulyk, Francesco Favruzzo, Ludovica De Rosa, Federica Viaro, Alessio Pieroni, Stefano Mozzetta, Milan R Vosko, Claudio Baracchini","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02121-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial color Doppler (TCD) is currently the only noninvasive bedside tool capable of providing real-time information on cerebral hemodynamics. However, being operator dependent, TCD monitoring is not feasible in many institutions. Robotic assisted TCD (ra-TCD) was recently developed to overcome these constraints. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of cerebral monitoring with a novel ra-TCD in acute neurovascular care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a two-center prospective study conducted between August 2021 and February 2022 at Padua University Hospital (Padua, Italy) and Kepler University Hospital (Linz, Austria). Adult patients with conditions impacting cerebral hemodynamics or patients undergoing invasive procedures affecting cerebral hemodynamics were recruited for prolonged monitoring (> 30 min) of the middle cerebral artery with a novel ra-TCD (NovaGuide Intelligent Ultrasound, NeuraSignal, Los Angeles, CA). Manual TCD was also performed for comparison by an experienced operator. Feasibility and safety rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 patients (age: mean 68.5 years, range 36-91; sex: male 57 [62%]) were enrolled in the two centers: 54 in Padua, 38 in Linz. The examination was feasible in the majority of patients (85.9%); the head cradle design and its radiopacity hindered its use during carotid endarterectomy and mechanical thrombectomy. Regarding safety, only one patient (1.1%) reported a minor local edema due to prolonged probe pressure. Velocity values were similar between ra-TCD and manual TCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel ra-TCD showed an excellent safety and feasibility and proved to be as reliable as manual TCD in detecting blood flow velocities. These findings support its wider use for cerebral hemodynamics monitoring in acute neurovascular care. However, further technical improvements are needed to expand the range of applicable settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"457-464"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robotic Assisted Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Acute Neurovascular Care: A Feasibility and Safety Study.\",\"authors\":\"Alvise Fattorello Salimbeni, Caterina Kulyk, Francesco Favruzzo, Ludovica De Rosa, Federica Viaro, Alessio Pieroni, Stefano Mozzetta, Milan R Vosko, Claudio Baracchini\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12028-024-02121-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcranial color Doppler (TCD) is currently the only noninvasive bedside tool capable of providing real-time information on cerebral hemodynamics. However, being operator dependent, TCD monitoring is not feasible in many institutions. Robotic assisted TCD (ra-TCD) was recently developed to overcome these constraints. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of cerebral monitoring with a novel ra-TCD in acute neurovascular care.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a two-center prospective study conducted between August 2021 and February 2022 at Padua University Hospital (Padua, Italy) and Kepler University Hospital (Linz, Austria). Adult patients with conditions impacting cerebral hemodynamics or patients undergoing invasive procedures affecting cerebral hemodynamics were recruited for prolonged monitoring (> 30 min) of the middle cerebral artery with a novel ra-TCD (NovaGuide Intelligent Ultrasound, NeuraSignal, Los Angeles, CA). Manual TCD was also performed for comparison by an experienced operator. Feasibility and safety rates were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 92 patients (age: mean 68.5 years, range 36-91; sex: male 57 [62%]) were enrolled in the two centers: 54 in Padua, 38 in Linz. The examination was feasible in the majority of patients (85.9%); the head cradle design and its radiopacity hindered its use during carotid endarterectomy and mechanical thrombectomy. Regarding safety, only one patient (1.1%) reported a minor local edema due to prolonged probe pressure. Velocity values were similar between ra-TCD and manual TCD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This novel ra-TCD showed an excellent safety and feasibility and proved to be as reliable as manual TCD in detecting blood flow velocities. These findings support its wider use for cerebral hemodynamics monitoring in acute neurovascular care. However, further technical improvements are needed to expand the range of applicable settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19118,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"457-464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurocritical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02121-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/19 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02121-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经颅彩色多普勒(TCD)是目前唯一能够提供实时脑血流动力学信息的无创床边工具。然而,由于 TCD 监测依赖于操作者,因此在许多机构并不可行。最近开发的机器人辅助 TCD(ra-TCD)克服了这些限制。本研究旨在评估在急性神经血管治疗中使用新型 ra-TCD 进行脑监测的安全性和可行性:这是一项双中心前瞻性研究,于 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 2 月在帕多瓦大学医院(意大利帕多瓦)和开普勒大学医院(奥地利林茨)进行。研究人员招募了患有影响脑血流动力学疾病的成年患者或正在接受影响脑血流动力学侵入性手术的患者,使用新型ra-TCD(NovaGuide智能超声,NeuraSignal公司,加利福尼亚州洛杉矶)对大脑中动脉进行长时间(大于30分钟)监测。一名经验丰富的操作员也进行了手动 TCD 进行比较。记录了可行性和安全性:两个中心共接收了 92 名患者(年龄:平均 68.5 岁,36-91 岁不等;性别:男性 57 [62%]):帕多瓦 54 人,林茨 38 人。大多数患者(85.9%)都能接受该检查;头部支架的设计及其放射能力妨碍了其在颈动脉内膜剥脱术和机械血栓切除术中的应用。在安全性方面,只有一名患者(1.1%)报告因探头压力过大而导致局部轻微水肿。ra-TCD和手动TCD的速度值相似:这种新型ra-TCD显示出极佳的安全性和可行性,在检测血流速度方面与手动TCD一样可靠。这些研究结果支持将其广泛应用于急性神经血管护理中的脑血流动力学监测。不过,还需要进一步改进技术,以扩大适用范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Robotic Assisted Transcranial Doppler Monitoring in Acute Neurovascular Care: A Feasibility and Safety Study.

Background: Transcranial color Doppler (TCD) is currently the only noninvasive bedside tool capable of providing real-time information on cerebral hemodynamics. However, being operator dependent, TCD monitoring is not feasible in many institutions. Robotic assisted TCD (ra-TCD) was recently developed to overcome these constraints. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and feasibility of cerebral monitoring with a novel ra-TCD in acute neurovascular care.

Methods: This is a two-center prospective study conducted between August 2021 and February 2022 at Padua University Hospital (Padua, Italy) and Kepler University Hospital (Linz, Austria). Adult patients with conditions impacting cerebral hemodynamics or patients undergoing invasive procedures affecting cerebral hemodynamics were recruited for prolonged monitoring (> 30 min) of the middle cerebral artery with a novel ra-TCD (NovaGuide Intelligent Ultrasound, NeuraSignal, Los Angeles, CA). Manual TCD was also performed for comparison by an experienced operator. Feasibility and safety rates were recorded.

Results: A total of 92 patients (age: mean 68.5 years, range 36-91; sex: male 57 [62%]) were enrolled in the two centers: 54 in Padua, 38 in Linz. The examination was feasible in the majority of patients (85.9%); the head cradle design and its radiopacity hindered its use during carotid endarterectomy and mechanical thrombectomy. Regarding safety, only one patient (1.1%) reported a minor local edema due to prolonged probe pressure. Velocity values were similar between ra-TCD and manual TCD.

Conclusions: This novel ra-TCD showed an excellent safety and feasibility and proved to be as reliable as manual TCD in detecting blood flow velocities. These findings support its wider use for cerebral hemodynamics monitoring in acute neurovascular care. However, further technical improvements are needed to expand the range of applicable settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信