为家访护士开发一个量表,以便与癌症患者展开临终讨论。

IF 3.2 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Kurumi Asaumi, Masataka Oki, Wataru Ohashi
{"title":"为家访护士开发一个量表,以便与癌症患者展开临终讨论。","authors":"Kurumi Asaumi, Masataka Oki, Wataru Ohashi","doi":"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Home-visit nurses find it challenging to determine the appropriate time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop the Timing of End-of-Life Discussions (T-EOLD) scale to help home-visit nurses determine the appropriate time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients and to test its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scale items were developed based on qualitative data extracted from interviews, literature reviews, and expert panel discussions. We conducted a preliminary study involving 93 home-visit nurses and evaluated the construct validity, consistency, and test-retest reliability of the scale. Finally, using a sample of 234 home-visit nurses, we conducted the primary study and assessed the construct validity and scale consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 items were initially developed. Floor effect, item-total correlation, good-poor, and exploratory factor analysis in the preliminary and primary studies yielded a three-factor, 16-item model. The model's goodness-of-fit was CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.90, AGFI = 0.87, and RMSEA = 0.06. Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reliability and validity of the T-EOLD is acceptable, as it is an appropriate scale that home-visit nurses can use to determine the time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients. However, further study is required to examine T-EOLD's clinical utility, both nationally and internationally.</p>","PeriodicalId":16634,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pain and symptom management","volume":" ","pages":"1-9.e1"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developing a Scale for Home-Visit Nurses to Start End-of-life Discussions with Cancer Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Kurumi Asaumi, Masataka Oki, Wataru Ohashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Home-visit nurses find it challenging to determine the appropriate time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to develop the Timing of End-of-Life Discussions (T-EOLD) scale to help home-visit nurses determine the appropriate time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients and to test its reliability and validity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The scale items were developed based on qualitative data extracted from interviews, literature reviews, and expert panel discussions. We conducted a preliminary study involving 93 home-visit nurses and evaluated the construct validity, consistency, and test-retest reliability of the scale. Finally, using a sample of 234 home-visit nurses, we conducted the primary study and assessed the construct validity and scale consistency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 41 items were initially developed. Floor effect, item-total correlation, good-poor, and exploratory factor analysis in the preliminary and primary studies yielded a three-factor, 16-item model. The model's goodness-of-fit was CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.90, AGFI = 0.87, and RMSEA = 0.06. Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.91.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The reliability and validity of the T-EOLD is acceptable, as it is an appropriate scale that home-visit nurses can use to determine the time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients. However, further study is required to examine T-EOLD's clinical utility, both nationally and internationally.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16634,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9.e1\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of pain and symptom management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.003\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/11 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pain and symptom management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.09.003","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/11 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:家访护士发现,确定与癌症患者进行生命末期讨论的适当时机具有挑战性:本研究旨在开发生命末期讨论时机量表(T-EOLD),以帮助家访护士确定与癌症患者展开生命末期讨论的适当时机,并测试其信度和效度:方法:量表项目是根据从访谈、文献综述和专家小组讨论中提取的定性数据编制的。我们进行了一项涉及 93 名家访护士的初步研究,并评估了量表的结构效度、一致性和测试-再测可靠性。最后,我们以 234 名家访护士为样本进行了初步研究,并评估了量表的建构效度和一致性:最初共编制了 41 个项目。在初步研究和主要研究中,通过地板效应、项目-总相关性、好-差和探索性因素分析,得出了一个三因素、16 个项目的模型。该模型的拟合优度为 CFI = 0.94,GFI = 0.90,AGFI = 0.87,RMSEA = 0.06。总体量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.91:T-EOLD的信度和效度是可以接受的,因为它是一个合适的量表,家访护士可以用它来确定与癌症患者展开临终讨论的时间。不过,还需要进一步研究 T-EOLD 在国内外的临床实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Developing a Scale for Home-Visit Nurses to Start End-of-life Discussions with Cancer Patients.

Context: Home-visit nurses find it challenging to determine the appropriate time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients.

Objective: This study aimed to develop the Timing of End-of-Life Discussions (T-EOLD) scale to help home-visit nurses determine the appropriate time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients and to test its reliability and validity.

Methods: The scale items were developed based on qualitative data extracted from interviews, literature reviews, and expert panel discussions. We conducted a preliminary study involving 93 home-visit nurses and evaluated the construct validity, consistency, and test-retest reliability of the scale. Finally, using a sample of 234 home-visit nurses, we conducted the primary study and assessed the construct validity and scale consistency.

Results: A total of 41 items were initially developed. Floor effect, item-total correlation, good-poor, and exploratory factor analysis in the preliminary and primary studies yielded a three-factor, 16-item model. The model's goodness-of-fit was CFI = 0.94, GFI = 0.90, AGFI = 0.87, and RMSEA = 0.06. Cronbach's alpha for the overall scale was 0.91.

Conclusions: The reliability and validity of the T-EOLD is acceptable, as it is an appropriate scale that home-visit nurses can use to determine the time to initiate end-of-life discussions with cancer patients. However, further study is required to examine T-EOLD's clinical utility, both nationally and internationally.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
6.40%
发文量
821
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Pain and Symptom Management is an internationally respected, peer-reviewed journal and serves an interdisciplinary audience of professionals by providing a forum for the publication of the latest clinical research and best practices related to the relief of illness burden among patients afflicted with serious or life-threatening illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信