比较西帕糖苷酶α加米格鲁司他与其他酶替代疗法治疗晚发型庞贝氏症的疗效:利用患者层面和综合数据的网络荟萃分析。

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Simon Shohet, Noemi Hummel, Shuai Fu, Ian Keyzor, Alasdair MacCulloch, Neil Johnson, Jeff Castelli, Ilona Czarny-Ozga, Tahseen Mozaffar, Howard Thom
{"title":"比较西帕糖苷酶α加米格鲁司他与其他酶替代疗法治疗晚发型庞贝氏症的疗效:利用患者层面和综合数据的网络荟萃分析。","authors":"Simon Shohet, Noemi Hummel, Shuai Fu, Ian Keyzor, Alasdair MacCulloch, Neil Johnson, Jeff Castelli, Ilona Czarny-Ozga, Tahseen Mozaffar, Howard Thom","doi":"10.57264/cer-2024-0045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Late-onset Pompe disease is characterized by progressive loss of muscular and respiratory function. Until recently, standard of care was enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa. Second-generation ERTs avalglucosidase alfa (aval) and cipaglucosidase alfa with miglustat (cipa+mig) are now available. Without head-to-head trials comparing aval with cipa+mig, an indirect treatment comparison is informative and timely for understanding potential clinical differentiation. <b>Materials & methods:</b> A systematic literature review was performed to identify relevant studies on cipa+mig and aval. Using patient-level and aggregate published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and phase I/II and open-label extension (OLE) trials, a multi-level network meta-regression was conducted, adjusting for various baseline covariates, including previous ERT duration, to obtain relative effect estimates on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD, meters [m]) and forced vital capacity (FVC, % predicted [pp]). Analyses of two networks were conducted: Network A, including only RCTs, and network B, additionally including single-arm OLE and phase I/II studies. <b>Results:</b> Network B (full evidence analysis) showed that cipa+mig was associated with a relative increase in 6MWD (mean difference 28.93 m, 95% credible interval [8.26-50.11 m]; Bayesian probability 99.7%) and FVC (2.88 pp [1.07-4.71 pp]; >99.9%) compared with aval. The comparison between cipa+mig and aval became more favorable for cipa+mig with increasing previous ERT duration for both end points. Analysis of network A showed that cipa+mig was associated with a relative decrease in 6MWD (-10.02 m [-23.62 to 4.00 m]; 91.8%) and FVC (-1.45 pp [-3.01 to 0.07 pp]; 96.8%) compared with aval. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cipa+mig showed a favorable effect versus aval when all available evidence was used in the analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":15539,"journal":{"name":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","volume":" ","pages":"e240045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426283/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing the efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat with other enzyme replacement therapies for late-onset Pompe disease: a network meta-analysis utilizing patient-level and aggregate data.\",\"authors\":\"Simon Shohet, Noemi Hummel, Shuai Fu, Ian Keyzor, Alasdair MacCulloch, Neil Johnson, Jeff Castelli, Ilona Czarny-Ozga, Tahseen Mozaffar, Howard Thom\",\"doi\":\"10.57264/cer-2024-0045\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Aim:</b> Late-onset Pompe disease is characterized by progressive loss of muscular and respiratory function. Until recently, standard of care was enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa. Second-generation ERTs avalglucosidase alfa (aval) and cipaglucosidase alfa with miglustat (cipa+mig) are now available. Without head-to-head trials comparing aval with cipa+mig, an indirect treatment comparison is informative and timely for understanding potential clinical differentiation. <b>Materials & methods:</b> A systematic literature review was performed to identify relevant studies on cipa+mig and aval. Using patient-level and aggregate published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and phase I/II and open-label extension (OLE) trials, a multi-level network meta-regression was conducted, adjusting for various baseline covariates, including previous ERT duration, to obtain relative effect estimates on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD, meters [m]) and forced vital capacity (FVC, % predicted [pp]). Analyses of two networks were conducted: Network A, including only RCTs, and network B, additionally including single-arm OLE and phase I/II studies. <b>Results:</b> Network B (full evidence analysis) showed that cipa+mig was associated with a relative increase in 6MWD (mean difference 28.93 m, 95% credible interval [8.26-50.11 m]; Bayesian probability 99.7%) and FVC (2.88 pp [1.07-4.71 pp]; >99.9%) compared with aval. The comparison between cipa+mig and aval became more favorable for cipa+mig with increasing previous ERT duration for both end points. Analysis of network A showed that cipa+mig was associated with a relative decrease in 6MWD (-10.02 m [-23.62 to 4.00 m]; 91.8%) and FVC (-1.45 pp [-3.01 to 0.07 pp]; 96.8%) compared with aval. <b>Conclusion:</b> Cipa+mig showed a favorable effect versus aval when all available evidence was used in the analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15539,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"e240045\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11426283/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of comparative effectiveness research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0045\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/17 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of comparative effectiveness research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.57264/cer-2024-0045","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:晚发庞贝病的特征是肌肉和呼吸功能进行性丧失。直到最近,标准疗法仍是使用阿糖苷酶α进行酶替代治疗(ERT)。现在,第二代 ERTs 阿糖苷酶α(aval)和西帕糖苷酶α加米格司他(cipa+mig)已经上市。在没有头对头试验对阿瓦尔和西帕+米格进行比较的情况下,间接治疗比较对了解潜在的临床分化具有参考价值,而且非常及时。材料与方法:我们进行了系统的文献综述,以确定关于 cipa+mig 和 aval 的相关研究。利用来自随机对照试验(RCT)、I/II 期试验和开放标签扩展试验(OLE)的患者水平数据和已发表的综合数据,进行了多层次网络元回归,调整了各种基线协变量(包括之前的 ERT 持续时间),以获得 6 分钟步行距离(6MWD,米[m])和强迫生命容量(FVC,预测百分比[pp])的相对效应估计值。对两个网络进行了分析:网络 A 仅包括 RCT,网络 B 还包括单臂 OLE 和 I/II 期研究。结果网络 B(全证据分析)显示,与aval相比,cipa+mig与6MWD(平均差异28.93米,95%可信区间[8.26-50.11米];贝叶斯概率99.7%)和FVC(2.88 pp [1.07-4.71 pp];>99.9%)的相对增加有关。cipa+mig 与 aval 的比较结果表明,随着先前 ERT 持续时间的增加,cipa+mig 对两个终点都更有利。对网络 A 的分析表明,cipa+mig 与 aval 相比,6MWD(-10.02 m [-23.62 to 4.00 m];91.8%)和 FVC(-1.45 pp [-3.01 to 0.07 pp];96.8%)相对减少。结论在使用所有可用证据进行分析时,Cipa+mig 与 aval 相比显示出良好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing the efficacy of cipaglucosidase alfa plus miglustat with other enzyme replacement therapies for late-onset Pompe disease: a network meta-analysis utilizing patient-level and aggregate data.

Aim: Late-onset Pompe disease is characterized by progressive loss of muscular and respiratory function. Until recently, standard of care was enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with alglucosidase alfa. Second-generation ERTs avalglucosidase alfa (aval) and cipaglucosidase alfa with miglustat (cipa+mig) are now available. Without head-to-head trials comparing aval with cipa+mig, an indirect treatment comparison is informative and timely for understanding potential clinical differentiation. Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was performed to identify relevant studies on cipa+mig and aval. Using patient-level and aggregate published data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and phase I/II and open-label extension (OLE) trials, a multi-level network meta-regression was conducted, adjusting for various baseline covariates, including previous ERT duration, to obtain relative effect estimates on 6-minute walk distance (6MWD, meters [m]) and forced vital capacity (FVC, % predicted [pp]). Analyses of two networks were conducted: Network A, including only RCTs, and network B, additionally including single-arm OLE and phase I/II studies. Results: Network B (full evidence analysis) showed that cipa+mig was associated with a relative increase in 6MWD (mean difference 28.93 m, 95% credible interval [8.26-50.11 m]; Bayesian probability 99.7%) and FVC (2.88 pp [1.07-4.71 pp]; >99.9%) compared with aval. The comparison between cipa+mig and aval became more favorable for cipa+mig with increasing previous ERT duration for both end points. Analysis of network A showed that cipa+mig was associated with a relative decrease in 6MWD (-10.02 m [-23.62 to 4.00 m]; 91.8%) and FVC (-1.45 pp [-3.01 to 0.07 pp]; 96.8%) compared with aval. Conclusion: Cipa+mig showed a favorable effect versus aval when all available evidence was used in the analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of comparative effectiveness research
Journal of comparative effectiveness research HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
9.50%
发文量
121
期刊介绍: Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides a rapid-publication platform for debate, and for the presentation of new findings and research methodologies. Through rigorous evaluation and comprehensive coverage, the Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research provides stakeholders (including patients, clinicians, healthcare purchasers, and health policy makers) with the key data and opinions to make informed and specific decisions on clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信