Anders Steen Knudsen, David E Arney, Robert D Butterfield, Nathaniel M Sims, Vineeth Chandran Suja, Robert A Peterfreund
{"title":"泵驱动的临床输液:应用新的定量工具--药代动力学短期变异系数(PK-CV),对泵类型、液体成分和流速对模型给药的影响进行实验室比较。","authors":"Anders Steen Knudsen, David E Arney, Robert D Butterfield, Nathaniel M Sims, Vineeth Chandran Suja, Robert A Peterfreund","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01200-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Critically ill or anesthetized patients commonly receive pump-driven intravenous infusions of potent, fast-acting, short half-life medications for managing hemodynamics. Stepwise dosing, e.g. over 3-5 min, adjusts physiologic responses. Flow rates range from < 0.1 to > 30 ml/h, depending on pump type (large volume, syringe) and drug concentration. Most drugs are formulated in aqueous solutions. Hydrophobic drugs are formulated as lipid emulsions. Do the physical and chemical properties of emulsions impact delivery compared to aqueous solutions? Does stepwise dose titration by the pump correlate with predicted plasma concentrations? Precise, gravimetric, flow rate measurement compared delivery of a 20% lipid emulsion (LE) and 0.9% saline (NS) using different pump types and flow rates. We measured stepwise delivery and then computed predicted plasma concentrations following stepwise dose titration. We measured the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation, (PK-CV), to assess pump performance. LE and NS had similar mean flow rates in stepwise rate increments and decrements between 0.5 and 32 ml/h and continuous flows 0.5 and 5 ml/h. Pharmacokinetic computation predictions suggest delayed achievement of intended plasma levels following dose titrations. Syringe pumps exhibited smaller variations in PK-CV than large volume pumps. Pump-driven deliveries of lipid emulsion and aqueous solution behave similarly. At low flow rates we observed large flow rate variability differences between pump types showing they may not be interchangeable. PK-CV analysis provides a quantitative tool to assess infusion pump performance. Drug plasma concentrations may lag behind intent of pump dose titration.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pump-driven clinical infusions: laboratory comparison of pump types, fluid composition and flow rates on model drug delivery applying a new quantitative tool, the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation (PK-CV).\",\"authors\":\"Anders Steen Knudsen, David E Arney, Robert D Butterfield, Nathaniel M Sims, Vineeth Chandran Suja, Robert A Peterfreund\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01200-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Critically ill or anesthetized patients commonly receive pump-driven intravenous infusions of potent, fast-acting, short half-life medications for managing hemodynamics. Stepwise dosing, e.g. over 3-5 min, adjusts physiologic responses. Flow rates range from < 0.1 to > 30 ml/h, depending on pump type (large volume, syringe) and drug concentration. Most drugs are formulated in aqueous solutions. Hydrophobic drugs are formulated as lipid emulsions. Do the physical and chemical properties of emulsions impact delivery compared to aqueous solutions? Does stepwise dose titration by the pump correlate with predicted plasma concentrations? Precise, gravimetric, flow rate measurement compared delivery of a 20% lipid emulsion (LE) and 0.9% saline (NS) using different pump types and flow rates. We measured stepwise delivery and then computed predicted plasma concentrations following stepwise dose titration. We measured the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation, (PK-CV), to assess pump performance. LE and NS had similar mean flow rates in stepwise rate increments and decrements between 0.5 and 32 ml/h and continuous flows 0.5 and 5 ml/h. Pharmacokinetic computation predictions suggest delayed achievement of intended plasma levels following dose titrations. Syringe pumps exhibited smaller variations in PK-CV than large volume pumps. Pump-driven deliveries of lipid emulsion and aqueous solution behave similarly. At low flow rates we observed large flow rate variability differences between pump types showing they may not be interchangeable. PK-CV analysis provides a quantitative tool to assess infusion pump performance. Drug plasma concentrations may lag behind intent of pump dose titration.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01200-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01200-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Pump-driven clinical infusions: laboratory comparison of pump types, fluid composition and flow rates on model drug delivery applying a new quantitative tool, the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation (PK-CV).
Critically ill or anesthetized patients commonly receive pump-driven intravenous infusions of potent, fast-acting, short half-life medications for managing hemodynamics. Stepwise dosing, e.g. over 3-5 min, adjusts physiologic responses. Flow rates range from < 0.1 to > 30 ml/h, depending on pump type (large volume, syringe) and drug concentration. Most drugs are formulated in aqueous solutions. Hydrophobic drugs are formulated as lipid emulsions. Do the physical and chemical properties of emulsions impact delivery compared to aqueous solutions? Does stepwise dose titration by the pump correlate with predicted plasma concentrations? Precise, gravimetric, flow rate measurement compared delivery of a 20% lipid emulsion (LE) and 0.9% saline (NS) using different pump types and flow rates. We measured stepwise delivery and then computed predicted plasma concentrations following stepwise dose titration. We measured the pharmacokinetic coefficient of short-term variation, (PK-CV), to assess pump performance. LE and NS had similar mean flow rates in stepwise rate increments and decrements between 0.5 and 32 ml/h and continuous flows 0.5 and 5 ml/h. Pharmacokinetic computation predictions suggest delayed achievement of intended plasma levels following dose titrations. Syringe pumps exhibited smaller variations in PK-CV than large volume pumps. Pump-driven deliveries of lipid emulsion and aqueous solution behave similarly. At low flow rates we observed large flow rate variability differences between pump types showing they may not be interchangeable. PK-CV analysis provides a quantitative tool to assess infusion pump performance. Drug plasma concentrations may lag behind intent of pump dose titration.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.