手法、利尿和输液对超声测量的丰坦术后肝脏硬度的影响。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Hepatology Communications Pub Date : 2024-09-18 eCollection Date: 2024-10-01 DOI:10.1097/HC9.0000000000000527
Pradipta Debnath, Cara E Morin, Julie Bonn, Samjhana Thapaliya, Clayton A Smith, Jonathan R Dillman, Andrew T Trout
{"title":"手法、利尿和输液对超声测量的丰坦术后肝脏硬度的影响。","authors":"Pradipta Debnath, Cara E Morin, Julie Bonn, Samjhana Thapaliya, Clayton A Smith, Jonathan R Dillman, Andrew T Trout","doi":"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000527","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the effect of stress maneuvers/interventions on ultrasound liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) in patients with Fontan circulation and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, IRB-approved study of 10 patients after Fontan palliation and 10 healthy controls, ultrasound 2D shear-wave elastography LSMs were acquired at baseline and after maximum inspiration, expiration, standing, handgrip, aerobic exercise, i.v. fluid (500 mL normal saline) administration, and i.v. furosemide (20 mg) administration. Absolute and percent change in LSM were compared between baseline and each maneuver, and then from fluid infusion to after diuresis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ages were 25.5 and 26 years in the post-Fontan and control groups (p = 0.796). LSMs after Fontan were higher at baseline (2.6 vs. 1.3 m/s) and with all maneuvers compared to controls (all p < 0.001). Changes in LSM with maneuvers, exercise, fluid, or diuresis were not significant when compared to baseline in post-Fontan patients. LSM in controls increased with inspiration (+0.02 m/s, 1.6%, p = 0.03), standing (+0.07 m/s, 5.5%, p = 0.03), and fluid administration (+0.10 m/s, 7.8%, p = 0.002), and decreased 60 minutes after diuretic administration (-0.05 m/s, -3.9%, p = 0.01) compared to baseline. LSM after diuretic administration significantly decreased when compared to after i.v. fluid administration at 30 minutes (-0.79 m/s, -26.5%, p = 0.004) and 60 minutes (-0.78 m/s, -26.2%, p = 0.017) for patients after Fontan and controls at 15 minutes (-0.12 m/s, -8.70%, p = 0.002), 30 minutes (-0.15 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.003), and 60 minutes (-0.1 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSM after Fontan is higher with more variability compared to controls. Diuresis is associated with significantly decreased liver stiffness in both patients after Fontan and controls, with the suggestion of a greater effect in Fontan patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12978,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology Communications","volume":"8 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412719/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of maneuvers, diuresis, and fluid administration on ultrasound-measured liver stiffness after Fontan.\",\"authors\":\"Pradipta Debnath, Cara E Morin, Julie Bonn, Samjhana Thapaliya, Clayton A Smith, Jonathan R Dillman, Andrew T Trout\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/HC9.0000000000000527\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To determine the effect of stress maneuvers/interventions on ultrasound liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) in patients with Fontan circulation and healthy controls.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, IRB-approved study of 10 patients after Fontan palliation and 10 healthy controls, ultrasound 2D shear-wave elastography LSMs were acquired at baseline and after maximum inspiration, expiration, standing, handgrip, aerobic exercise, i.v. fluid (500 mL normal saline) administration, and i.v. furosemide (20 mg) administration. Absolute and percent change in LSM were compared between baseline and each maneuver, and then from fluid infusion to after diuresis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median ages were 25.5 and 26 years in the post-Fontan and control groups (p = 0.796). LSMs after Fontan were higher at baseline (2.6 vs. 1.3 m/s) and with all maneuvers compared to controls (all p < 0.001). Changes in LSM with maneuvers, exercise, fluid, or diuresis were not significant when compared to baseline in post-Fontan patients. LSM in controls increased with inspiration (+0.02 m/s, 1.6%, p = 0.03), standing (+0.07 m/s, 5.5%, p = 0.03), and fluid administration (+0.10 m/s, 7.8%, p = 0.002), and decreased 60 minutes after diuretic administration (-0.05 m/s, -3.9%, p = 0.01) compared to baseline. LSM after diuretic administration significantly decreased when compared to after i.v. fluid administration at 30 minutes (-0.79 m/s, -26.5%, p = 0.004) and 60 minutes (-0.78 m/s, -26.2%, p = 0.017) for patients after Fontan and controls at 15 minutes (-0.12 m/s, -8.70%, p = 0.002), 30 minutes (-0.15 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.003), and 60 minutes (-0.1 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.005).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>LSM after Fontan is higher with more variability compared to controls. Diuresis is associated with significantly decreased liver stiffness in both patients after Fontan and controls, with the suggestion of a greater effect in Fontan patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"volume\":\"8 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11412719/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology Communications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000527\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/10/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology Communications","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HC9.0000000000000527","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:旨在确定应激操作/干预对丰坦循环患者和健康对照组超声肝脏硬度测量(LSM)的影响:目的:确定应力操作/干预对丰坦循环患者和健康对照组超声肝脏硬度测量(LSM)的影响:在这项经 IRB 批准的前瞻性研究中,对 10 名接受丰坦姑息治疗的患者和 10 名健康对照组患者在基线和最大吸气、呼气、站立、握手、有氧运动、静脉输液(500 毫升生理盐水)和静脉注射呋塞米(20 毫克)后进行了超声二维剪切波弹性成像 LSM 采集。比较基线与每次操作之间以及输液与利尿后 LSM 的绝对值和百分比变化:结果:Fontan术后组和对照组的中位年龄分别为25.5岁和26岁(P = 0.796)。与对照组相比,Fontan术后的LSM在基线(2.6对1.3米/秒)和所有操作下均较高(所有p均<0.001)。与基线相比,丰坦术后患者的 LSM 随操作、运动、输液或利尿的变化不显著。与基线相比,对照组患者的 LSM 在吸气(+0.02 m/s,1.6%,p = 0.03)、站立(+0.07 m/s,5.5%,p = 0.03)和输液(+0.10 m/s,7.8%,p = 0.002)时增加,在服用利尿剂 60 分钟后减少(-0.05 m/s,-3.9%,p = 0.01)。与静脉输液后 30 分钟(-0.79 m/s,-26.5%,p = 0.004)和 60 分钟(-0.78 m/s,-26.2%,p = 0.017)相比,给予利尿剂后 LSM 明显下降。结论:Fontan术后患者的LSM在15分钟(-0.12 m/s,-8.70%,P = 0.002)、30分钟(-0.15 m/s,-10.9%,P = 0.003)和60分钟(-0.1 m/s,-10.9%,P = 0.005)时高于对照组:结论:与对照组相比,Fontan术后的LSM更高,变异性更大。在Fontan术后患者和对照组中,利尿与肝脏僵硬度的明显降低有关,但Fontan术后患者的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of maneuvers, diuresis, and fluid administration on ultrasound-measured liver stiffness after Fontan.

Background: To determine the effect of stress maneuvers/interventions on ultrasound liver stiffness measurements (LSMs) in patients with Fontan circulation and healthy controls.

Methods: In this prospective, IRB-approved study of 10 patients after Fontan palliation and 10 healthy controls, ultrasound 2D shear-wave elastography LSMs were acquired at baseline and after maximum inspiration, expiration, standing, handgrip, aerobic exercise, i.v. fluid (500 mL normal saline) administration, and i.v. furosemide (20 mg) administration. Absolute and percent change in LSM were compared between baseline and each maneuver, and then from fluid infusion to after diuresis.

Results: Median ages were 25.5 and 26 years in the post-Fontan and control groups (p = 0.796). LSMs after Fontan were higher at baseline (2.6 vs. 1.3 m/s) and with all maneuvers compared to controls (all p < 0.001). Changes in LSM with maneuvers, exercise, fluid, or diuresis were not significant when compared to baseline in post-Fontan patients. LSM in controls increased with inspiration (+0.02 m/s, 1.6%, p = 0.03), standing (+0.07 m/s, 5.5%, p = 0.03), and fluid administration (+0.10 m/s, 7.8%, p = 0.002), and decreased 60 minutes after diuretic administration (-0.05 m/s, -3.9%, p = 0.01) compared to baseline. LSM after diuretic administration significantly decreased when compared to after i.v. fluid administration at 30 minutes (-0.79 m/s, -26.5%, p = 0.004) and 60 minutes (-0.78 m/s, -26.2%, p = 0.017) for patients after Fontan and controls at 15 minutes (-0.12 m/s, -8.70%, p = 0.002), 30 minutes (-0.15 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.003), and 60 minutes (-0.1 m/s, -10.9%, p = 0.005).

Conclusions: LSM after Fontan is higher with more variability compared to controls. Diuresis is associated with significantly decreased liver stiffness in both patients after Fontan and controls, with the suggestion of a greater effect in Fontan patients.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology Communications
Hepatology Communications GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
2.00%
发文量
248
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology Communications is a peer-reviewed, online-only, open access journal for fast dissemination of high quality basic, translational, and clinical research in hepatology. Hepatology Communications maintains high standard and rigorous peer review. Because of its open access nature, authors retain the copyright to their works, all articles are immediately available and free to read and share, and it is fully compliant with funder and institutional mandates. The journal is committed to fast publication and author satisfaction. ​
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信