腰痛虚拟医院护理模式(Back@Home)的过程和实施评估。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Alla Melman BAppSci, MSc, PhD, Min J Teng BAppSci, MHSM, Danielle M Coombs BAppSci, PhD, Qiang Li MSc, Laurent Billot MSc, MRes, Thomas Lung MSc, PhD, Eileen Rogan MBBS, MHSM, PhD, Mona Marabani MBBS, Owen Hutchings MBBS, Joshua R Zadro BAppSci, PhD, Chris G Maher BAppSci, DMedSc, PhD, Gustavo C Machado BPhty, PhD, The Back@Home Investigators
{"title":"腰痛虚拟医院护理模式(Back@Home)的过程和实施评估。","authors":"Alla Melman BAppSci, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Min J Teng BAppSci, MHSM,&nbsp;Danielle M Coombs BAppSci, PhD,&nbsp;Qiang Li MSc,&nbsp;Laurent Billot MSc, MRes,&nbsp;Thomas Lung MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Eileen Rogan MBBS, MHSM, PhD,&nbsp;Mona Marabani MBBS,&nbsp;Owen Hutchings MBBS,&nbsp;Joshua R Zadro BAppSci, PhD,&nbsp;Chris G Maher BAppSci, DMedSc, PhD,&nbsp;Gustavo C Machado BPhty, PhD,&nbsp;The Back@Home Investigators","doi":"10.1111/1742-6723.14487","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Low back pain was the sixth most common reason for an ED visit in 2022–2023 in Australia, one-third of these patients were subsequently admitted to hospital. Therefore, we have assessed whether some patients could be diverted to alternate clinical pathways, via admission to a virtual hospital (<b>rpa</b>virtual), and be cared for remotely in their own homes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Ethics approval was granted for protocols X21-0278 &amp; 2021/ETH10967 and X21-0094 &amp; 2021/ETH00591. We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) to answer key questions regarding the Back@Home model of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>This preliminary evaluation describes a cohort of the first 50 patients who received care between 13 February and 31 July 2023. The service had high levels of reach and adoption, very low levels of ED representation, and no AEs. Virtual care cost a median of AU$2215 (interquartile range = AU$1724–AU$2855) per admission. Patients admitted virtually had the same high satisfaction with care as traditionally admitted patients and reported less pain and better physical function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Preliminary findings suggest that this model of care is a safe, acceptable, and feasible alternative to hospitalisation for non-serious low back pain, in a select cohort of patients meeting inclusion criteria. Further data collection will inform whether Back@Home has had an impact on length of stay or traditional admission rates.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":11604,"journal":{"name":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14487","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Process and implementation evaluation of a virtual hospital model of care for low back pain (Back@Home)\",\"authors\":\"Alla Melman BAppSci, MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Min J Teng BAppSci, MHSM,&nbsp;Danielle M Coombs BAppSci, PhD,&nbsp;Qiang Li MSc,&nbsp;Laurent Billot MSc, MRes,&nbsp;Thomas Lung MSc, PhD,&nbsp;Eileen Rogan MBBS, MHSM, PhD,&nbsp;Mona Marabani MBBS,&nbsp;Owen Hutchings MBBS,&nbsp;Joshua R Zadro BAppSci, PhD,&nbsp;Chris G Maher BAppSci, DMedSc, PhD,&nbsp;Gustavo C Machado BPhty, PhD,&nbsp;The Back@Home Investigators\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1742-6723.14487\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Low back pain was the sixth most common reason for an ED visit in 2022–2023 in Australia, one-third of these patients were subsequently admitted to hospital. Therefore, we have assessed whether some patients could be diverted to alternate clinical pathways, via admission to a virtual hospital (<b>rpa</b>virtual), and be cared for remotely in their own homes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Ethics approval was granted for protocols X21-0278 &amp; 2021/ETH10967 and X21-0094 &amp; 2021/ETH00591. We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) to answer key questions regarding the Back@Home model of care.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>This preliminary evaluation describes a cohort of the first 50 patients who received care between 13 February and 31 July 2023. The service had high levels of reach and adoption, very low levels of ED representation, and no AEs. Virtual care cost a median of AU$2215 (interquartile range = AU$1724–AU$2855) per admission. Patients admitted virtually had the same high satisfaction with care as traditionally admitted patients and reported less pain and better physical function.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Preliminary findings suggest that this model of care is a safe, acceptable, and feasible alternative to hospitalisation for non-serious low back pain, in a select cohort of patients meeting inclusion criteria. Further data collection will inform whether Back@Home has had an impact on length of stay or traditional admission rates.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11604,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1742-6723.14487\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Emergency Medicine Australasia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14487\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emergency Medicine Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1742-6723.14487","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:2022-2023 年,腰痛是澳大利亚急诊室就诊的第六大常见原因,其中三分之一的患者随后入院治疗。因此,我们评估了一些患者是否可以通过入住虚拟医院(rpavirtual)转入其他临床路径,并在自己家中接受远程护理:X21-0278和2021/ETH10967以及X21-0094和2021/ETH00591方案已获得伦理批准。我们采用RE-AIM框架(覆盖面、有效性、采用、实施和维护)进行了混合方法过程评估,以回答有关 "Back@Home "护理模式的关键问题:本初步评估描述了 2023 年 2 月 13 日至 7 月 31 日期间接受护理的首批 50 名患者。该服务的覆盖率和采用率都很高,急诊室代表率很低,且没有发生AE。虚拟医疗的每次入院费用中位数为 2215 澳元(四分位间范围 = 1724 澳元 - 2855 澳元)。虚拟入院患者对护理的满意度与传统入院患者一样高,并表示疼痛较轻、身体功能较好:初步研究结果表明,在符合纳入标准的特定患者群体中,这种护理模式是一种安全、可接受且可行的非严重腰背痛住院治疗替代方案。进一步的数据收集将有助于了解 "回到家 "是否对住院时间或传统入院率产生了影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Process and implementation evaluation of a virtual hospital model of care for low back pain (Back@Home)

Objectives

Low back pain was the sixth most common reason for an ED visit in 2022–2023 in Australia, one-third of these patients were subsequently admitted to hospital. Therefore, we have assessed whether some patients could be diverted to alternate clinical pathways, via admission to a virtual hospital (rpavirtual), and be cared for remotely in their own homes.

Methods

Ethics approval was granted for protocols X21-0278 & 2021/ETH10967 and X21-0094 & 2021/ETH00591. We conducted a mixed-method process evaluation, using the RE-AIM framework (reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation and maintenance) to answer key questions regarding the Back@Home model of care.

Results

This preliminary evaluation describes a cohort of the first 50 patients who received care between 13 February and 31 July 2023. The service had high levels of reach and adoption, very low levels of ED representation, and no AEs. Virtual care cost a median of AU$2215 (interquartile range = AU$1724–AU$2855) per admission. Patients admitted virtually had the same high satisfaction with care as traditionally admitted patients and reported less pain and better physical function.

Conclusions

Preliminary findings suggest that this model of care is a safe, acceptable, and feasible alternative to hospitalisation for non-serious low back pain, in a select cohort of patients meeting inclusion criteria. Further data collection will inform whether Back@Home has had an impact on length of stay or traditional admission rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Emergency Medicine Australasia
Emergency Medicine Australasia 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
13.00%
发文量
217
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Emergency Medicine Australasia is the official journal of the Australasian College for Emergency Medicine (ACEM) and the Australasian Society for Emergency Medicine (ASEM), and publishes original articles dealing with all aspects of clinical practice, research, education and experiences in emergency medicine. Original articles are published under the following sections: Original Research, Paediatric Emergency Medicine, Disaster Medicine, Education and Training, Ethics, International Emergency Medicine, Management and Quality, Medicolegal Matters, Prehospital Care, Public Health, Rural and Remote Care, Technology, Toxicology and Trauma. Accepted papers become the copyright of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信