用于肝细胞癌风险分层和预测的基于点的风险评分:基于人群的随机生存森林模型研究。

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
EClinicalMedicine Pub Date : 2024-08-22 eCollection Date: 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102796
Zhenqiu Liu, Huangbo Yuan, Chen Suo, Renjia Zhao, Li Jin, Xuehong Zhang, Tiejun Zhang, Xingdong Chen
{"title":"用于肝细胞癌风险分层和预测的基于点的风险评分:基于人群的随机生存森林模型研究。","authors":"Zhenqiu Liu, Huangbo Yuan, Chen Suo, Renjia Zhao, Li Jin, Xuehong Zhang, Tiejun Zhang, Xingdong Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The precise associations between common clinical biomarkers and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk remain unclear but hold valuable insights for HCC risk stratification and prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the linear and nonlinear associations between the baseline levels of 32 circulating biomarkers and HCC risk in the England cohort of UK Biobank (UKBB) (n = 397,702). The participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to 31st October 2022. The primary outcome is incident HCC cases. We then employed random survival forests (RSF) to select the top ten most informative biomarkers, considering their association with HCC, and developed a point-based risk score to predict HCC. The performance of the risk score was evaluated in three validation sets including UKBB Scotland and Wales cohort (n = 52,721), UKBB non-White-British cohort (n = 29,315), and the Taizhou Longitudinal Study in China (n = 17,269).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twenty-five biomarkers were significantly associated with HCC risk, either linearly or nonlinearly. Based on the RSF model selected biomarkers, our point-based risk score showed a concordance index of 0.866 in the England cohort and varied between 0.814 and 0.849 in the three validation sets. HCC incidence rates ranged from 0.95 to 30.82 per 100,000 from the lowest to the highest quintiles of the risk score in the England cohort. Individuals in the highest risk quintile had a 32-73 times greater risk of HCC compared to those in the lowest quintile. Moreover, over 70% of HCC cases were detected in individuals within the top risk score quintile across all cohorts.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our simple risk score enables the identification of high-risk individuals of HCC in the general population. However, including some biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor 1, not routinely measured in clinical practice may increase the model's complexity, highlighting the need for more accessible biomarkers that can maintain or improve the predictive accuracy of the risk score.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 82204125) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Taizhou (TS202224).</p>","PeriodicalId":11393,"journal":{"name":"EClinicalMedicine","volume":"75 ","pages":"102796"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11388332/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Point-based risk score for the risk stratification and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based random survival forest modeling study.\",\"authors\":\"Zhenqiu Liu, Huangbo Yuan, Chen Suo, Renjia Zhao, Li Jin, Xuehong Zhang, Tiejun Zhang, Xingdong Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102796\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The precise associations between common clinical biomarkers and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk remain unclear but hold valuable insights for HCC risk stratification and prediction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined the linear and nonlinear associations between the baseline levels of 32 circulating biomarkers and HCC risk in the England cohort of UK Biobank (UKBB) (n = 397,702). The participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to 31st October 2022. The primary outcome is incident HCC cases. We then employed random survival forests (RSF) to select the top ten most informative biomarkers, considering their association with HCC, and developed a point-based risk score to predict HCC. The performance of the risk score was evaluated in three validation sets including UKBB Scotland and Wales cohort (n = 52,721), UKBB non-White-British cohort (n = 29,315), and the Taizhou Longitudinal Study in China (n = 17,269).</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Twenty-five biomarkers were significantly associated with HCC risk, either linearly or nonlinearly. Based on the RSF model selected biomarkers, our point-based risk score showed a concordance index of 0.866 in the England cohort and varied between 0.814 and 0.849 in the three validation sets. HCC incidence rates ranged from 0.95 to 30.82 per 100,000 from the lowest to the highest quintiles of the risk score in the England cohort. Individuals in the highest risk quintile had a 32-73 times greater risk of HCC compared to those in the lowest quintile. Moreover, over 70% of HCC cases were detected in individuals within the top risk score quintile across all cohorts.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>Our simple risk score enables the identification of high-risk individuals of HCC in the general population. However, including some biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor 1, not routinely measured in clinical practice may increase the model's complexity, highlighting the need for more accessible biomarkers that can maintain or improve the predictive accuracy of the risk score.</p><p><strong>Funding: </strong>This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 82204125) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Taizhou (TS202224).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"volume\":\"75 \",\"pages\":\"102796\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11388332/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EClinicalMedicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102796\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EClinicalMedicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102796","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:常见的临床生物标志物与肝细胞癌(HCC)风险之间的确切联系仍不清楚,但对HCC风险分层和预测具有重要意义:常见临床生物标志物与肝细胞癌(HCC)风险之间的确切关系仍不清楚,但对HCC风险分层和预测具有重要价值:我们研究了英国生物库(UKBB)英格兰队列(n = 397,702 人)中 32 种循环生物标志物的基线水平与 HCC 风险之间的线性和非线性关系。参与者于2006年至2010年间入组,随访至2022年10月31日。主要结果是发生 HCC 病例。然后,我们采用随机生存森林(RSF)筛选出信息量最大的前十个生物标志物,并考虑到它们与HCC的关联性,制定了一个基于点的风险评分来预测HCC。在三个验证组(包括英国苏格兰和威尔士队列(52721人)、英国非白种英国队列(29315人)和中国台州纵向研究(17269人))中对风险评分的性能进行了评估:25种生物标志物与HCC风险呈线性或非线性显著相关。根据 RSF 模型所选的生物标志物,我们基于点的风险评分在英格兰队列中的一致性指数为 0.866,在三个验证组中的一致性指数介于 0.814 和 0.849 之间。在英格兰队列中,从风险评分的最低五分位数到最高五分位数,每十万人中的 HCC 发病率从 0.95 到 30.82 不等。与最低五分位数的人相比,风险最高五分位数的人患 HCC 的风险要高出 32-73 倍。此外,在所有队列中,超过70%的HCC病例是在风险评分最高的五分之一人群中发现的:我们的简单风险评分能够识别普通人群中的HCC高危人群。然而,将临床实践中未常规测量的一些生物标志物(如胰岛素样生长因子1)纳入模型可能会增加模型的复杂性,这突出表明需要更多可获得的生物标志物,以保持或提高风险评分的预测准确性:本研究得到了国家自然科学基金(批准号:82204125)和台州市科技支撑计划(TS202224)的资助。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Point-based risk score for the risk stratification and prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma: a population-based random survival forest modeling study.

Background: The precise associations between common clinical biomarkers and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk remain unclear but hold valuable insights for HCC risk stratification and prediction.

Methods: We examined the linear and nonlinear associations between the baseline levels of 32 circulating biomarkers and HCC risk in the England cohort of UK Biobank (UKBB) (n = 397,702). The participants were enrolled between 2006 and 2010 and followed up to 31st October 2022. The primary outcome is incident HCC cases. We then employed random survival forests (RSF) to select the top ten most informative biomarkers, considering their association with HCC, and developed a point-based risk score to predict HCC. The performance of the risk score was evaluated in three validation sets including UKBB Scotland and Wales cohort (n = 52,721), UKBB non-White-British cohort (n = 29,315), and the Taizhou Longitudinal Study in China (n = 17,269).

Findings: Twenty-five biomarkers were significantly associated with HCC risk, either linearly or nonlinearly. Based on the RSF model selected biomarkers, our point-based risk score showed a concordance index of 0.866 in the England cohort and varied between 0.814 and 0.849 in the three validation sets. HCC incidence rates ranged from 0.95 to 30.82 per 100,000 from the lowest to the highest quintiles of the risk score in the England cohort. Individuals in the highest risk quintile had a 32-73 times greater risk of HCC compared to those in the lowest quintile. Moreover, over 70% of HCC cases were detected in individuals within the top risk score quintile across all cohorts.

Interpretation: Our simple risk score enables the identification of high-risk individuals of HCC in the general population. However, including some biomarkers, such as insulin-like growth factor 1, not routinely measured in clinical practice may increase the model's complexity, highlighting the need for more accessible biomarkers that can maintain or improve the predictive accuracy of the risk score.

Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers: 82204125) and the Science and Technology Support Program of Taizhou (TS202224).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EClinicalMedicine
EClinicalMedicine Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
18.90
自引率
1.30%
发文量
506
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: eClinicalMedicine is a gold open-access clinical journal designed to support frontline health professionals in addressing the complex and rapid health transitions affecting societies globally. The journal aims to assist practitioners in overcoming healthcare challenges across diverse communities, spanning diagnosis, treatment, prevention, and health promotion. Integrating disciplines from various specialties and life stages, it seeks to enhance health systems as fundamental institutions within societies. With a forward-thinking approach, eClinicalMedicine aims to redefine the future of healthcare.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信