基于多罗替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒疗法的先天畸形风险:系统回顾与元分析》。

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Clinical Drug Investigation Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-09-20 DOI:10.1007/s40261-024-01390-y
Shuvasree Payra, Divya Harsha, Keshav Kumar, Pramod Kumar Manjhi, Shruti Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Sunil Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar, Vikas Maharshi
{"title":"基于多罗替拉韦的抗逆转录病毒疗法的先天畸形风险:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Shuvasree Payra, Divya Harsha, Keshav Kumar, Pramod Kumar Manjhi, Shruti Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Sunil Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar, Vikas Maharshi","doi":"10.1007/s40261-024-01390-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dolutegravir has been used as a first-line anti-human immunodeficiency virus drug because of its better efficacy compared with other counterpart medicines. However, making a unanimous decision on its use during pregnancy has become difficult for stakeholders following congenital anomalies reported with its use. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the risk of congenital anomalies in newborns exposed to dolutegravir-based-regimens compared with those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens during the antenatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 30 November, 2023. Studies reporting data on congenital anomalies following antenatal use of dolutegravir were included. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies was assessed using RoB2, ROBINS-I, and ROBINS-E tools, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed in 'RevMan 5.4.1' using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the 'Q' statistic and I<sup>2</sup> value. A sensitivity analysis was performed for higher heterogeneity/high-risk studies. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42023446374] a priori.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 eligible studies, 12 (six randomized controlled trials and six observational studies with a pooled sample of 32,617) were included in a meta-analysis and 14 in a qualitative synthesis only. The meta-analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of congenital anomalies between newborns exposed antenatally to dolutegravir-based regimen(s) and those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens [risk ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.53; p = 0.59]. Heterogeneity was moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 47%). Pooled results for randomized controlled trials and observational studies separately and the sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity provided similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of congenital anomalies was not significantly different between dolutegravir-based regimens and non-dolutegravir-based-regimens in newborns exposed during their antenatal period.</p>","PeriodicalId":10402,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Drug Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"667-685"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk of Congenital Anomalies with Dolutegravir-Based Anti-retroviral Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Shuvasree Payra, Divya Harsha, Keshav Kumar, Pramod Kumar Manjhi, Shruti Singh, Rajesh Kumar, Sunil Kumar Singh, Alok Kumar, Vikas Maharshi\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40261-024-01390-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Dolutegravir has been used as a first-line anti-human immunodeficiency virus drug because of its better efficacy compared with other counterpart medicines. However, making a unanimous decision on its use during pregnancy has become difficult for stakeholders following congenital anomalies reported with its use. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the risk of congenital anomalies in newborns exposed to dolutegravir-based-regimens compared with those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens during the antenatal period.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An extensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 30 November, 2023. Studies reporting data on congenital anomalies following antenatal use of dolutegravir were included. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies was assessed using RoB2, ROBINS-I, and ROBINS-E tools, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed in 'RevMan 5.4.1' using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the 'Q' statistic and I<sup>2</sup> value. A sensitivity analysis was performed for higher heterogeneity/high-risk studies. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42023446374] a priori.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 26 eligible studies, 12 (six randomized controlled trials and six observational studies with a pooled sample of 32,617) were included in a meta-analysis and 14 in a qualitative synthesis only. The meta-analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of congenital anomalies between newborns exposed antenatally to dolutegravir-based regimen(s) and those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens [risk ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.53; p = 0.59]. Heterogeneity was moderate (I<sup>2</sup> = 47%). Pooled results for randomized controlled trials and observational studies separately and the sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity provided similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The risk of congenital anomalies was not significantly different between dolutegravir-based regimens and non-dolutegravir-based-regimens in newborns exposed during their antenatal period.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10402,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"667-685\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Drug Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01390-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/9/20 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Drug Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-024-01390-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:多罗替拉韦(Dolutegravir)因其疗效优于其他同类药物,已被用作抗人类免疫缺陷病毒的一线药物。然而,在使用该药物后出现先天性畸形的报道后,利益相关者很难就孕期使用该药物做出一致决定。本系统综述和荟萃分析的目的是研究在产前暴露于多罗替拉韦治疗方案与非多罗替拉韦治疗方案的新生儿发生先天性畸形的风险:截至 2023 年 11 月 30 日,在 MEDLINE(通过 PubMed)、EMBASE、Cochrane 系统综述数据库、Google Scholar 和 ClinicalTrials.gov 中进行了广泛的文献检索。纳入了报告产前使用多鲁曲韦后先天畸形数据的研究。采用 RoB2、ROBINS-I 和 ROBINS-E 工具分别评估了随机对照试验、非随机对照试验和观察性研究的偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型在 "RevMan 5.4.1 "中进行了荟萃分析。异质性通过 "Q "统计量和 I2 值进行评估。对异质性较高/风险较高的研究进行了敏感性分析。研究方案事先已在 PROSPERO [CRD42023446374] 中注册:在 26 项符合条件的研究中,12 项(6 项随机对照试验和 6 项观察性研究,共 32 617 个样本)被纳入荟萃分析,14 项仅被纳入定性综合分析。荟萃分析表明,产前暴露于多罗替拉韦治疗方案的新生儿与暴露于非多罗替拉韦治疗方案的新生儿发生先天性畸形的风险没有显著统计学差异[风险比 1.10;95% 置信区间 0.79-1.53;P = 0.59]。异质性为中等(I2 = 47%)。随机对照试验和观察性研究的汇总结果与异质性敏感性分析的结果相似:结论:在产前暴露于多罗替拉韦的新生儿中,多罗替拉韦治疗方案与非多罗替拉韦治疗方案发生先天性畸形的风险没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Risk of Congenital Anomalies with Dolutegravir-Based Anti-retroviral Regimens: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Background and objectives: Dolutegravir has been used as a first-line anti-human immunodeficiency virus drug because of its better efficacy compared with other counterpart medicines. However, making a unanimous decision on its use during pregnancy has become difficult for stakeholders following congenital anomalies reported with its use. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to study the risk of congenital anomalies in newborns exposed to dolutegravir-based-regimens compared with those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens during the antenatal period.

Methods: An extensive literature search was performed in MEDLINE (through PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov until 30 November, 2023. Studies reporting data on congenital anomalies following antenatal use of dolutegravir were included. Risk of bias for randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and observational studies was assessed using RoB2, ROBINS-I, and ROBINS-E tools, respectively. A meta-analysis was performed in 'RevMan 5.4.1' using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed by the 'Q' statistic and I2 value. A sensitivity analysis was performed for higher heterogeneity/high-risk studies. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO [CRD42023446374] a priori.

Results: Of 26 eligible studies, 12 (six randomized controlled trials and six observational studies with a pooled sample of 32,617) were included in a meta-analysis and 14 in a qualitative synthesis only. The meta-analysis does not show a statistically significant difference in the risk of congenital anomalies between newborns exposed antenatally to dolutegravir-based regimen(s) and those exposed to non-dolutegravir-based regimens [risk ratio 1.10; 95% confidence interval 0.79-1.53; p = 0.59]. Heterogeneity was moderate (I2 = 47%). Pooled results for randomized controlled trials and observational studies separately and the sensitivity analysis for heterogeneity provided similar results.

Conclusions: The risk of congenital anomalies was not significantly different between dolutegravir-based regimens and non-dolutegravir-based-regimens in newborns exposed during their antenatal period.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.10%
发文量
108
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Drug Investigation provides rapid publication of original research covering all phases of clinical drug development and therapeutic use of drugs. The Journal includes: -Clinical trials, outcomes research, clinical pharmacoeconomic studies and pharmacoepidemiology studies with a strong link to optimum prescribing practice for a drug or group of drugs. -Clinical pharmacodynamic and clinical pharmacokinetic studies with a strong link to clinical practice. -Pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic studies in healthy volunteers in which significant implications for clinical prescribing are discussed. -Studies focusing on the application of drug delivery technology in healthcare. -Short communications and case study reports that meet the above criteria will also be considered. Additional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in Clinical Drug Investigation may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge, but non in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信