Matteo Piga, Luca Quartuccio, Fabiola Atzeni, Andrea Doria, Giacomo Emmi, Franco Franceschini, Maria Gerosa, Marta Mosca, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Fabrizio Conti, Marcello Govoni
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮的诊断途径和治疗偏好:基于医生的离散选择实验。","authors":"Matteo Piga, Luca Quartuccio, Fabiola Atzeni, Andrea Doria, Giacomo Emmi, Franco Franceschini, Maria Gerosa, Marta Mosca, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Fabrizio Conti, Marcello Govoni","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess physicians' preferences on diagnostic pathways and treatment priorities for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A board of 11 SLE experts and a DCE expert statistician defined informative profiles of diagnostic pathways, pharmacological therapies, and two distinct profiles of mild-moderate and severe SLE. An independent panel of 115 clinicians involved in SLE management was invited to participate. Parameter estimates from the model were interpreted as relative preference weights (PWs). The mean PWs were used to calculate each attribute's relative importance (RI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 clinicians (57% females, 71% rheumatologists) completed the DCEs. The DCEs could not identify a hierarchy of importance among diagnostic pathway attributes. Nevertheless, \"referral time to a rheumatologist\" was considered more important for mild-moderate (RI=25%) and severe (RI=20%) SLE. Among the therapeutic attributes, the effect on organ damage progression after 12 months showed the highest preference for mild-moderate (RI=35%) and severe (RI=41%) SLE patients, followed by reduction in disease activity levels (max RI=19%) and glucocorticoid dose (max RI=13%) after six months. Reducing prednisone dose below 5 mg/day scored higher utility levels for mild-moderate (PW=66.1) than severe (PW=14.2) SLE. Administration route, action rapidity, patient-global assessment, and serious infection risk showed lesser relevance (RI 7-8%). No distinctions were found among subgroups categorised by the clinicians' areas of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These DCEs highlight a high degree of awareness among lupus-treating physicians, with no differences across medical specialties, of the unmet need for early diagnosis and prevention of damage accrual in SLE management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic pathway and treatment preferences for systemic lupus erythematosus: a physician-based discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Piga, Luca Quartuccio, Fabiola Atzeni, Andrea Doria, Giacomo Emmi, Franco Franceschini, Maria Gerosa, Marta Mosca, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Fabrizio Conti, Marcello Govoni\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess physicians' preferences on diagnostic pathways and treatment priorities for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A board of 11 SLE experts and a DCE expert statistician defined informative profiles of diagnostic pathways, pharmacological therapies, and two distinct profiles of mild-moderate and severe SLE. An independent panel of 115 clinicians involved in SLE management was invited to participate. Parameter estimates from the model were interpreted as relative preference weights (PWs). The mean PWs were used to calculate each attribute's relative importance (RI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 clinicians (57% females, 71% rheumatologists) completed the DCEs. The DCEs could not identify a hierarchy of importance among diagnostic pathway attributes. Nevertheless, \\\"referral time to a rheumatologist\\\" was considered more important for mild-moderate (RI=25%) and severe (RI=20%) SLE. Among the therapeutic attributes, the effect on organ damage progression after 12 months showed the highest preference for mild-moderate (RI=35%) and severe (RI=41%) SLE patients, followed by reduction in disease activity levels (max RI=19%) and glucocorticoid dose (max RI=13%) after six months. Reducing prednisone dose below 5 mg/day scored higher utility levels for mild-moderate (PW=66.1) than severe (PW=14.2) SLE. Administration route, action rapidity, patient-global assessment, and serious infection risk showed lesser relevance (RI 7-8%). No distinctions were found among subgroups categorised by the clinicians' areas of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These DCEs highlight a high degree of awareness among lupus-treating physicians, with no differences across medical specialties, of the unmet need for early diagnosis and prevention of damage accrual in SLE management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Diagnostic pathway and treatment preferences for systemic lupus erythematosus: a physician-based discrete choice experiment.
Objectives: To assess physicians' preferences on diagnostic pathways and treatment priorities for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).
Methods: A board of 11 SLE experts and a DCE expert statistician defined informative profiles of diagnostic pathways, pharmacological therapies, and two distinct profiles of mild-moderate and severe SLE. An independent panel of 115 clinicians involved in SLE management was invited to participate. Parameter estimates from the model were interpreted as relative preference weights (PWs). The mean PWs were used to calculate each attribute's relative importance (RI).
Results: 95 clinicians (57% females, 71% rheumatologists) completed the DCEs. The DCEs could not identify a hierarchy of importance among diagnostic pathway attributes. Nevertheless, "referral time to a rheumatologist" was considered more important for mild-moderate (RI=25%) and severe (RI=20%) SLE. Among the therapeutic attributes, the effect on organ damage progression after 12 months showed the highest preference for mild-moderate (RI=35%) and severe (RI=41%) SLE patients, followed by reduction in disease activity levels (max RI=19%) and glucocorticoid dose (max RI=13%) after six months. Reducing prednisone dose below 5 mg/day scored higher utility levels for mild-moderate (PW=66.1) than severe (PW=14.2) SLE. Administration route, action rapidity, patient-global assessment, and serious infection risk showed lesser relevance (RI 7-8%). No distinctions were found among subgroups categorised by the clinicians' areas of expertise.
Conclusions: These DCEs highlight a high degree of awareness among lupus-treating physicians, with no differences across medical specialties, of the unmet need for early diagnosis and prevention of damage accrual in SLE management.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.