系统性红斑狼疮的诊断途径和治疗偏好:基于医生的离散选择实验。

IF 3.4 4区 医学 Q2 RHEUMATOLOGY
Matteo Piga, Luca Quartuccio, Fabiola Atzeni, Andrea Doria, Giacomo Emmi, Franco Franceschini, Maria Gerosa, Marta Mosca, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Fabrizio Conti, Marcello Govoni
{"title":"系统性红斑狼疮的诊断途径和治疗偏好:基于医生的离散选择实验。","authors":"Matteo Piga, Luca Quartuccio, Fabiola Atzeni, Andrea Doria, Giacomo Emmi, Franco Franceschini, Maria Gerosa, Marta Mosca, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Fabrizio Conti, Marcello Govoni","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess physicians' preferences on diagnostic pathways and treatment priorities for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A board of 11 SLE experts and a DCE expert statistician defined informative profiles of diagnostic pathways, pharmacological therapies, and two distinct profiles of mild-moderate and severe SLE. An independent panel of 115 clinicians involved in SLE management was invited to participate. Parameter estimates from the model were interpreted as relative preference weights (PWs). The mean PWs were used to calculate each attribute's relative importance (RI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 clinicians (57% females, 71% rheumatologists) completed the DCEs. The DCEs could not identify a hierarchy of importance among diagnostic pathway attributes. Nevertheless, \"referral time to a rheumatologist\" was considered more important for mild-moderate (RI=25%) and severe (RI=20%) SLE. Among the therapeutic attributes, the effect on organ damage progression after 12 months showed the highest preference for mild-moderate (RI=35%) and severe (RI=41%) SLE patients, followed by reduction in disease activity levels (max RI=19%) and glucocorticoid dose (max RI=13%) after six months. Reducing prednisone dose below 5 mg/day scored higher utility levels for mild-moderate (PW=66.1) than severe (PW=14.2) SLE. Administration route, action rapidity, patient-global assessment, and serious infection risk showed lesser relevance (RI 7-8%). No distinctions were found among subgroups categorised by the clinicians' areas of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These DCEs highlight a high degree of awareness among lupus-treating physicians, with no differences across medical specialties, of the unmet need for early diagnosis and prevention of damage accrual in SLE management.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic pathway and treatment preferences for systemic lupus erythematosus: a physician-based discrete choice experiment.\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Piga, Luca Quartuccio, Fabiola Atzeni, Andrea Doria, Giacomo Emmi, Franco Franceschini, Maria Gerosa, Marta Mosca, Patrizio Pasqualetti, Gian Domenico Sebastiani, Fabrizio Conti, Marcello Govoni\",\"doi\":\"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess physicians' preferences on diagnostic pathways and treatment priorities for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A board of 11 SLE experts and a DCE expert statistician defined informative profiles of diagnostic pathways, pharmacological therapies, and two distinct profiles of mild-moderate and severe SLE. An independent panel of 115 clinicians involved in SLE management was invited to participate. Parameter estimates from the model were interpreted as relative preference weights (PWs). The mean PWs were used to calculate each attribute's relative importance (RI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 clinicians (57% females, 71% rheumatologists) completed the DCEs. The DCEs could not identify a hierarchy of importance among diagnostic pathway attributes. Nevertheless, \\\"referral time to a rheumatologist\\\" was considered more important for mild-moderate (RI=25%) and severe (RI=20%) SLE. Among the therapeutic attributes, the effect on organ damage progression after 12 months showed the highest preference for mild-moderate (RI=35%) and severe (RI=41%) SLE patients, followed by reduction in disease activity levels (max RI=19%) and glucocorticoid dose (max RI=13%) after six months. Reducing prednisone dose below 5 mg/day scored higher utility levels for mild-moderate (PW=66.1) than severe (PW=14.2) SLE. Administration route, action rapidity, patient-global assessment, and serious infection risk showed lesser relevance (RI 7-8%). No distinctions were found among subgroups categorised by the clinicians' areas of expertise.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These DCEs highlight a high degree of awareness among lupus-treating physicians, with no differences across medical specialties, of the unmet need for early diagnosis and prevention of damage accrual in SLE management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10274,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and experimental rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RHEUMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/25a2qk","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的采用离散选择实验(DCE)评估医生对系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)的诊断途径和治疗重点的偏好:由 11 位系统性红斑狼疮专家组成的委员会和一位 DCE 专家统计学家定义了诊断途径、药物疗法以及轻中度和重度系统性红斑狼疮两种不同情况的信息概况。一个由115名从事系统性红斑狼疮治疗的临床医生组成的独立小组应邀参加了此次会议。模型中的参数估计值被解释为相对偏好权重(PW)。PW 的平均值用于计算每个属性的相对重要性 (RI):95 名临床医生(57% 为女性,71% 为风湿免疫科医生)完成了 DCE。DCE 无法确定诊断路径属性之间的重要性等级。然而,"转诊至风湿免疫科医生的时间 "被认为对轻中度(RI=25%)和重度(RI=20%)系统性红斑狼疮更为重要。在治疗属性中,对轻中度(RI=35%)和重度(RI=41%)系统性红斑狼疮患者来说,12 个月后器官损伤进展的影响最重要,其次是 6 个月后疾病活动水平的降低(最大 RI=19%)和糖皮质激素剂量的减少(最大 RI=13%)。将泼尼松剂量降至5毫克/天以下,轻中度(PW=66.1)系统性红斑狼疮患者的效用水平高于重度(PW=14.2)系统性红斑狼疮患者。给药途径、作用快慢、患者整体评估和严重感染风险的相关性较低(RI 7-8%)。按临床医生的专业领域分类的亚组之间没有发现区别:这些 DCEs 强调了治疗狼疮的医生对系统性红斑狼疮治疗中早期诊断和预防损害累积的需求的高度认识,不同专业之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Diagnostic pathway and treatment preferences for systemic lupus erythematosus: a physician-based discrete choice experiment.

Objectives: To assess physicians' preferences on diagnostic pathways and treatment priorities for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) using a discrete choice experiment (DCE).

Methods: A board of 11 SLE experts and a DCE expert statistician defined informative profiles of diagnostic pathways, pharmacological therapies, and two distinct profiles of mild-moderate and severe SLE. An independent panel of 115 clinicians involved in SLE management was invited to participate. Parameter estimates from the model were interpreted as relative preference weights (PWs). The mean PWs were used to calculate each attribute's relative importance (RI).

Results: 95 clinicians (57% females, 71% rheumatologists) completed the DCEs. The DCEs could not identify a hierarchy of importance among diagnostic pathway attributes. Nevertheless, "referral time to a rheumatologist" was considered more important for mild-moderate (RI=25%) and severe (RI=20%) SLE. Among the therapeutic attributes, the effect on organ damage progression after 12 months showed the highest preference for mild-moderate (RI=35%) and severe (RI=41%) SLE patients, followed by reduction in disease activity levels (max RI=19%) and glucocorticoid dose (max RI=13%) after six months. Reducing prednisone dose below 5 mg/day scored higher utility levels for mild-moderate (PW=66.1) than severe (PW=14.2) SLE. Administration route, action rapidity, patient-global assessment, and serious infection risk showed lesser relevance (RI 7-8%). No distinctions were found among subgroups categorised by the clinicians' areas of expertise.

Conclusions: These DCEs highlight a high degree of awareness among lupus-treating physicians, with no differences across medical specialties, of the unmet need for early diagnosis and prevention of damage accrual in SLE management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
18.90%
发文量
377
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信