2013 年至 2022 年心血管设备一级召回情况 :横断面分析

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Claudia See, Maryam Mooghali, Sanket S Dhruva, Joseph S Ross, Harlan M Krumholz, Kushal T Kadakia
{"title":"2013 年至 2022 年心血管设备一级召回情况 :横断面分析","authors":"Claudia See, Maryam Mooghali, Sanket S Dhruva, Joseph S Ross, Harlan M Krumholz, Kushal T Kadakia","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular devices account for one third of all Class I recalls, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) most severe designation, indicating a reasonable probability of \"serious adverse health consequences or death.\" Understanding recalls and their causes is important for patient safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize Class I recalls of cardiovascular devices and the clinical evidence supporting authorization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, cardiovascular device recalls from 1 January 2013 through 31 December 2022 were identified using the FDA's annual log. Information about devices was extracted from publicly available FDA decision summaries.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The FDA Medical Device Recalls database.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Cardiovascular devices with Class I recalls.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Recalls were characterized by their causes and scope. Devices were characterized by their regulatory history (product code, special designations) and clinical evidence (premarket testing, postmarket surveillance). Clinical studies were analyzed for quality, including end point selection (clinical vs. surrogate, use of composites).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2013 to 2022, there were 137 Class I recall events affecting 157 unique cardiovascular devices, of which 112 (71.3%) were moderate-risk 510(k) devices and 45 (28.7%) were high-risk premarket approval (PMA) devices. Recalls affected a median of 7649 units (IQR, 953 to 28 446) and were most commonly attributed to device design (43 [31.4%]). Forty-two (26.8%) devices had multiple Class I recalls. Thirty (19.1%) devices underwent premarket clinical testing (7 [6.2%] 510(k) devices, 17 [85.0%] PMA devices, and 6 [24.0%] PMA supplement devices). Most studies used surrogate (27 [79.4%]) and composite (24 [70.6%]) measures as primary end points. Twenty-two (48.9%) PMA devices had required postapproval studies, with 14 reporting delays. No 510(k) devices were subject to postmarket surveillance.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Details about clinical testing may be missing from FDA summaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cardiovascular devices with Class I recalls were infrequently subjected to premarket or postmarket testing, with recalls affecting thousands of patients annually.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>None.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Class I Recalls of Cardiovascular Devices Between 2013 and 2022 : A Cross-Sectional Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Claudia See, Maryam Mooghali, Sanket S Dhruva, Joseph S Ross, Harlan M Krumholz, Kushal T Kadakia\",\"doi\":\"10.7326/ANNALS-24-00724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cardiovascular devices account for one third of all Class I recalls, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) most severe designation, indicating a reasonable probability of \\\"serious adverse health consequences or death.\\\" Understanding recalls and their causes is important for patient safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To characterize Class I recalls of cardiovascular devices and the clinical evidence supporting authorization.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>In this cross-sectional study, cardiovascular device recalls from 1 January 2013 through 31 December 2022 were identified using the FDA's annual log. Information about devices was extracted from publicly available FDA decision summaries.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The FDA Medical Device Recalls database.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Cardiovascular devices with Class I recalls.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Recalls were characterized by their causes and scope. Devices were characterized by their regulatory history (product code, special designations) and clinical evidence (premarket testing, postmarket surveillance). Clinical studies were analyzed for quality, including end point selection (clinical vs. surrogate, use of composites).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 2013 to 2022, there were 137 Class I recall events affecting 157 unique cardiovascular devices, of which 112 (71.3%) were moderate-risk 510(k) devices and 45 (28.7%) were high-risk premarket approval (PMA) devices. Recalls affected a median of 7649 units (IQR, 953 to 28 446) and were most commonly attributed to device design (43 [31.4%]). Forty-two (26.8%) devices had multiple Class I recalls. Thirty (19.1%) devices underwent premarket clinical testing (7 [6.2%] 510(k) devices, 17 [85.0%] PMA devices, and 6 [24.0%] PMA supplement devices). Most studies used surrogate (27 [79.4%]) and composite (24 [70.6%]) measures as primary end points. Twenty-two (48.9%) PMA devices had required postapproval studies, with 14 reporting delays. No 510(k) devices were subject to postmarket surveillance.</p><p><strong>Limitation: </strong>Details about clinical testing may be missing from FDA summaries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cardiovascular devices with Class I recalls were infrequently subjected to premarket or postmarket testing, with recalls affecting thousands of patients annually.</p><p><strong>Primary funding source: </strong>None.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7932,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":19.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Internal Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00724\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-00724","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:心血管器械召回占所有 I 类召回的三分之一,这是美国食品药品管理局(FDA)最严重的一类召回,表明有合理的可能性发生 "严重不良健康后果或死亡"。了解召回及其原因对患者安全非常重要:目的:描述心血管器械一级召回的特点以及支持授权的临床证据:在这项横断面研究中,通过 FDA 的年度日志确定了 2013 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间的心血管器械召回情况。有关器械的信息摘自公开的 FDA 决定摘要:FDA 医疗器械召回数据库:召回的心血管设备:召回的特点是其原因和范围。器械的特征是其监管历史(产品代码、特殊指定)和临床证据(上市前测试、上市后监测)。对临床研究的质量进行分析,包括终点选择(临床与代用、复合材料的使用):从2013年到2022年,共发生了137起I类召回事件,涉及157种心血管器械,其中112起(71.3%)为中度风险的510(k)器械,45起(28.7%)为高风险的上市前批准(PMA)器械。召回事件的中位数为 7649 件(IQR,953 到 28 446),最常见的原因是器械设计(43 [31.4%])。42台(26.8%)器械有多次一级召回。有 30 台(19.1%)器械进行了上市前临床测试(7 台 [6.2%] 510(k) 器械、17 台 [85.0%] PMA 器械和 6 台 [24.0%] PMA 补充器械)。大多数研究使用代用指标(27 [79.4%])和复合指标(24 [70.6%])作为主要终点。有 22 项(48.9%)PMA 器械需要进行批准后研究,其中 14 项报告了延迟。没有 510(k) 设备接受上市后监测:局限性:FDA摘要中可能缺少临床测试的详细信息:结论:一级召回的心血管设备很少接受上市前或上市后测试,每年有数千名患者受到召回影响:无。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Class I Recalls of Cardiovascular Devices Between 2013 and 2022 : A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

Background: Cardiovascular devices account for one third of all Class I recalls, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's (FDA) most severe designation, indicating a reasonable probability of "serious adverse health consequences or death." Understanding recalls and their causes is important for patient safety.

Objective: To characterize Class I recalls of cardiovascular devices and the clinical evidence supporting authorization.

Design: In this cross-sectional study, cardiovascular device recalls from 1 January 2013 through 31 December 2022 were identified using the FDA's annual log. Information about devices was extracted from publicly available FDA decision summaries.

Setting: The FDA Medical Device Recalls database.

Participants: Cardiovascular devices with Class I recalls.

Measurements: Recalls were characterized by their causes and scope. Devices were characterized by their regulatory history (product code, special designations) and clinical evidence (premarket testing, postmarket surveillance). Clinical studies were analyzed for quality, including end point selection (clinical vs. surrogate, use of composites).

Results: From 2013 to 2022, there were 137 Class I recall events affecting 157 unique cardiovascular devices, of which 112 (71.3%) were moderate-risk 510(k) devices and 45 (28.7%) were high-risk premarket approval (PMA) devices. Recalls affected a median of 7649 units (IQR, 953 to 28 446) and were most commonly attributed to device design (43 [31.4%]). Forty-two (26.8%) devices had multiple Class I recalls. Thirty (19.1%) devices underwent premarket clinical testing (7 [6.2%] 510(k) devices, 17 [85.0%] PMA devices, and 6 [24.0%] PMA supplement devices). Most studies used surrogate (27 [79.4%]) and composite (24 [70.6%]) measures as primary end points. Twenty-two (48.9%) PMA devices had required postapproval studies, with 14 reporting delays. No 510(k) devices were subject to postmarket surveillance.

Limitation: Details about clinical testing may be missing from FDA summaries.

Conclusion: Cardiovascular devices with Class I recalls were infrequently subjected to premarket or postmarket testing, with recalls affecting thousands of patients annually.

Primary funding source: None.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信