Johanna Blomgren , Helena Lindgren , Dinah Amongin , Kerstin Erlandsson , Christina Lundberg , Annette E. Kanyunyuzi , Sarah Muwanguzi , Victoria M. Babyrie , Ketty Ogwang , Dinnah Aineomugasho , Namutosi Catherine , Michael B. Wells
{"title":"助产士主导的质量改进:在乌干达更多地使用循证分娩实践","authors":"Johanna Blomgren , Helena Lindgren , Dinah Amongin , Kerstin Erlandsson , Christina Lundberg , Annette E. Kanyunyuzi , Sarah Muwanguzi , Victoria M. Babyrie , Ketty Ogwang , Dinnah Aineomugasho , Namutosi Catherine , Michael B. Wells","doi":"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Addressing the evidence-to-practice gap in midwifery is vital for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Despite the potential of involving midwives in quality improvement interventions to address this gap, such interventions are understudied. In a Ugandan urban hospital, midwifery practices with a significant evidence-to-practice gap have been identified as areas for clinical improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The primary objective of the Quality Improvement was to increase the uptake of identified and essential midwifery practices through a quality improvement approach led by midwives.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>We enrolled 703 women aged 18 years and older with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies (between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks) who gave birth at the facility.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The intervention focused on evidence-based practices with an identified evidence-to-practice gap: dynamic birth position, including women's involvement in birth position decision-making, perineal protection and intrapartum support. A team of midwives led a seven-month co-created quality improvement intervention. The intervention used Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles, following the Model for Improvement and included a train-the-trainer approach and weekly online support meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Data collection</h3><p>In this single-case prospective observational study, we compared pre-, during and post-intervention uptake of evidence-based practices. Trained research assistants collected data through interviews and observations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed improvements in the uptake of all clinical improvement areas. Dynamic birth positions increased from 0 % to 79 %, decision-making of birth positions from 0 % to 75 %, perineal protection measures from 62 % to 92 % and intrapartum support from 7 % to 67 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A multifactorial midwife-led Quality Improvement resulted in significant and sustained improvements in the uptake of evidence-based practices in maternal and newborn healthcare. If given the mandate and time, midwives can successfully lead Quality Improvements, which enhance the quality of care and close the evidence-to-practice gaps in maternal and newborn health. The study's results underscore the significance of developing effective strategies to enhance care quality and promote the adoption of evidence-based midwifery practices.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18495,"journal":{"name":"Midwifery","volume":"139 ","pages":"Article 104188"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002717/pdfft?md5=884886ea8f1865440cef0392f558900d&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002717-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Midwife-led quality improvement: Increasing the use of evidence-based birth practices in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"Johanna Blomgren , Helena Lindgren , Dinah Amongin , Kerstin Erlandsson , Christina Lundberg , Annette E. Kanyunyuzi , Sarah Muwanguzi , Victoria M. Babyrie , Ketty Ogwang , Dinnah Aineomugasho , Namutosi Catherine , Michael B. Wells\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.midw.2024.104188\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Addressing the evidence-to-practice gap in midwifery is vital for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Despite the potential of involving midwives in quality improvement interventions to address this gap, such interventions are understudied. In a Ugandan urban hospital, midwifery practices with a significant evidence-to-practice gap have been identified as areas for clinical improvement.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The primary objective of the Quality Improvement was to increase the uptake of identified and essential midwifery practices through a quality improvement approach led by midwives.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>We enrolled 703 women aged 18 years and older with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies (between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks) who gave birth at the facility.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention</h3><p>The intervention focused on evidence-based practices with an identified evidence-to-practice gap: dynamic birth position, including women's involvement in birth position decision-making, perineal protection and intrapartum support. A team of midwives led a seven-month co-created quality improvement intervention. The intervention used Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles, following the Model for Improvement and included a train-the-trainer approach and weekly online support meetings.</p></div><div><h3>Data collection</h3><p>In this single-case prospective observational study, we compared pre-, during and post-intervention uptake of evidence-based practices. Trained research assistants collected data through interviews and observations.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>We observed improvements in the uptake of all clinical improvement areas. Dynamic birth positions increased from 0 % to 79 %, decision-making of birth positions from 0 % to 75 %, perineal protection measures from 62 % to 92 % and intrapartum support from 7 % to 67 %.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>A multifactorial midwife-led Quality Improvement resulted in significant and sustained improvements in the uptake of evidence-based practices in maternal and newborn healthcare. If given the mandate and time, midwives can successfully lead Quality Improvements, which enhance the quality of care and close the evidence-to-practice gaps in maternal and newborn health. The study's results underscore the significance of developing effective strategies to enhance care quality and promote the adoption of evidence-based midwifery practices.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18495,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"139 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002717/pdfft?md5=884886ea8f1865440cef0392f558900d&pid=1-s2.0-S0266613824002717-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002717\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266613824002717","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Midwife-led quality improvement: Increasing the use of evidence-based birth practices in Uganda
Background
Addressing the evidence-to-practice gap in midwifery is vital for improving maternal and newborn health outcomes. Despite the potential of involving midwives in quality improvement interventions to address this gap, such interventions are understudied. In a Ugandan urban hospital, midwifery practices with a significant evidence-to-practice gap have been identified as areas for clinical improvement.
Objectives
The primary objective of the Quality Improvement was to increase the uptake of identified and essential midwifery practices through a quality improvement approach led by midwives.
Participants
We enrolled 703 women aged 18 years and older with uncomplicated full-term pregnancies (between 37+0 and 42+0 weeks) who gave birth at the facility.
Intervention
The intervention focused on evidence-based practices with an identified evidence-to-practice gap: dynamic birth position, including women's involvement in birth position decision-making, perineal protection and intrapartum support. A team of midwives led a seven-month co-created quality improvement intervention. The intervention used Plan–Do–Study–Act (PDSA) cycles, following the Model for Improvement and included a train-the-trainer approach and weekly online support meetings.
Data collection
In this single-case prospective observational study, we compared pre-, during and post-intervention uptake of evidence-based practices. Trained research assistants collected data through interviews and observations.
Results
We observed improvements in the uptake of all clinical improvement areas. Dynamic birth positions increased from 0 % to 79 %, decision-making of birth positions from 0 % to 75 %, perineal protection measures from 62 % to 92 % and intrapartum support from 7 % to 67 %.
Conclusion
A multifactorial midwife-led Quality Improvement resulted in significant and sustained improvements in the uptake of evidence-based practices in maternal and newborn healthcare. If given the mandate and time, midwives can successfully lead Quality Improvements, which enhance the quality of care and close the evidence-to-practice gaps in maternal and newborn health. The study's results underscore the significance of developing effective strategies to enhance care quality and promote the adoption of evidence-based midwifery practices.