幸福感与自然娱乐之间的关系:对美国、巴西和西班牙成年人的横断面研究

IF 6.1 1区 心理学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Claudio D. Rosa , Lincoln R. Larson , Silvia Collado , Sandra J. Geiger , Christiana C. Profice , Marcos R.T.P. Menuchi
{"title":"幸福感与自然娱乐之间的关系:对美国、巴西和西班牙成年人的横断面研究","authors":"Claudio D. Rosa ,&nbsp;Lincoln R. Larson ,&nbsp;Silvia Collado ,&nbsp;Sandra J. Geiger ,&nbsp;Christiana C. Profice ,&nbsp;Marcos R.T.P. Menuchi","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Growing evidence suggests that engagement in nature-based recreation can improve people's well-being. However, there is a lack of information regarding which specific nature-based recreation activities are related to specific well-being indicators. We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore how different types of nature-based recreation (i.e., any nature-based activities, forest-based activities, gardening, nature-based adventure activities) related to five indicators of well-being on the WHO-5 index among American (<em>n</em> = 606), Brazilian (<em>n</em> = 448), and Spanish (<em>n</em> = 438) adults. Americans and Brazilians who reported engaging in nature-based recreation at least monthly in the last 12 months, or weekly during a typical week, were more likely to feel cheerful, relaxed, vigorous, rested after waking up, and interested in life than those who did not engage that frequently. Results in these two countries were similar across all five indicators of well-being and types of nature-based activity, except for gardening, where we observed slightly weaker correlations. In Spain, the correlation between nature-based recreation and well-being tended to be null or even negative, highlighting some variability in these relationships across countries. Further cross-country experimental work is needed to support these findings and identify the relative efficacy of specific nature-based interventions for enhancing human well-being around the world.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"99 ","pages":"Article 102438"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002111/pdfft?md5=226b6e408d1af42902063e0941b162bf&pid=1-s2.0-S0272494424002111-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Associations between well-being and nature-based recreation: A cross-sectional study among adults in the United States, Brazil, and Spain\",\"authors\":\"Claudio D. Rosa ,&nbsp;Lincoln R. Larson ,&nbsp;Silvia Collado ,&nbsp;Sandra J. Geiger ,&nbsp;Christiana C. Profice ,&nbsp;Marcos R.T.P. Menuchi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102438\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Growing evidence suggests that engagement in nature-based recreation can improve people's well-being. However, there is a lack of information regarding which specific nature-based recreation activities are related to specific well-being indicators. We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore how different types of nature-based recreation (i.e., any nature-based activities, forest-based activities, gardening, nature-based adventure activities) related to five indicators of well-being on the WHO-5 index among American (<em>n</em> = 606), Brazilian (<em>n</em> = 448), and Spanish (<em>n</em> = 438) adults. Americans and Brazilians who reported engaging in nature-based recreation at least monthly in the last 12 months, or weekly during a typical week, were more likely to feel cheerful, relaxed, vigorous, rested after waking up, and interested in life than those who did not engage that frequently. Results in these two countries were similar across all five indicators of well-being and types of nature-based activity, except for gardening, where we observed slightly weaker correlations. In Spain, the correlation between nature-based recreation and well-being tended to be null or even negative, highlighting some variability in these relationships across countries. Further cross-country experimental work is needed to support these findings and identify the relative efficacy of specific nature-based interventions for enhancing human well-being around the world.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"99 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102438\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002111/pdfft?md5=226b6e408d1af42902063e0941b162bf&pid=1-s2.0-S0272494424002111-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002111\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494424002111","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

越来越多的证据表明,参与自然休闲活动可以提高人们的幸福感。然而,关于哪些特定的自然娱乐活动与特定的幸福指标相关,目前还缺乏相关信息。我们进行了一项横断面研究,探讨不同类型的自然娱乐活动(即任何自然活动、森林活动、园艺活动、自然探险活动)与美国(n = 606)、巴西(n = 448)和西班牙(n = 438)成年人的 WHO-5 指数中的五项幸福指标之间的关系。在过去 12 个月中至少每月参加一次自然娱乐活动或在典型的一周中每周参加一次自然娱乐活动的美国人和巴西人,与不经常参加自然娱乐活动的人相比,更有可能感到心情愉快、放松、精力充沛、睡醒后得到休息以及对生活充满兴趣。这两个国家在所有五项幸福感指标和自然活动类型方面的结果相似,只有园艺活动的相关性稍弱。在西班牙,基于自然的娱乐活动与幸福感之间的相关性往往为空,甚至是负相关,这凸显了这些关系在不同国家之间的一些差异。需要进一步开展跨国实验工作,以支持这些发现,并确定基于自然的具体干预措施对提高世界各地人类福祉的相对功效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Associations between well-being and nature-based recreation: A cross-sectional study among adults in the United States, Brazil, and Spain

Growing evidence suggests that engagement in nature-based recreation can improve people's well-being. However, there is a lack of information regarding which specific nature-based recreation activities are related to specific well-being indicators. We conducted a cross-sectional study to explore how different types of nature-based recreation (i.e., any nature-based activities, forest-based activities, gardening, nature-based adventure activities) related to five indicators of well-being on the WHO-5 index among American (n = 606), Brazilian (n = 448), and Spanish (n = 438) adults. Americans and Brazilians who reported engaging in nature-based recreation at least monthly in the last 12 months, or weekly during a typical week, were more likely to feel cheerful, relaxed, vigorous, rested after waking up, and interested in life than those who did not engage that frequently. Results in these two countries were similar across all five indicators of well-being and types of nature-based activity, except for gardening, where we observed slightly weaker correlations. In Spain, the correlation between nature-based recreation and well-being tended to be null or even negative, highlighting some variability in these relationships across countries. Further cross-country experimental work is needed to support these findings and identify the relative efficacy of specific nature-based interventions for enhancing human well-being around the world.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.60
自引率
8.70%
发文量
140
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信