{"title":"合作的轮廓:了解经济发展中的新兴实践社区","authors":"Joel Jennings","doi":"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104113","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Economic development is an industry that pits localities against one another in pursuit of vital, community-sustaining jobs. Despite this competitive context, an established literature documents significant benefits to collaboration between economic developers and, notably, practitioners’ awareness of these benefits. While much of the existing literature focuses on the benefits of cooperation or developers’ attitudes toward cooperation, there has been limited emphasis on how these practices evolve in social terms. This paper draws on qualitative interviews with 30 economic developers and allied practitioners to interrogate the dimensions of cooperation in the Midwestern state of Missouri. It argues that we can usefully understand the relationships that shape cooperation between competing practitioners as a distributed community of practice. The study highlights the ways that economic developers have shaped the domain, community, and practice of economic development to facilitate social processes of shared learning. Participants in this research describe a community environment where cooperation is an accepted norm, but where collaborative knowledge generation and problem solving could be extended through greater intentional community formation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":12497,"journal":{"name":"Geoforum","volume":"156 ","pages":"Article 104113"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contours of collaboration: Understanding emerging communities of practice in economic development\",\"authors\":\"Joel Jennings\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.geoforum.2024.104113\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Economic development is an industry that pits localities against one another in pursuit of vital, community-sustaining jobs. Despite this competitive context, an established literature documents significant benefits to collaboration between economic developers and, notably, practitioners’ awareness of these benefits. While much of the existing literature focuses on the benefits of cooperation or developers’ attitudes toward cooperation, there has been limited emphasis on how these practices evolve in social terms. This paper draws on qualitative interviews with 30 economic developers and allied practitioners to interrogate the dimensions of cooperation in the Midwestern state of Missouri. It argues that we can usefully understand the relationships that shape cooperation between competing practitioners as a distributed community of practice. The study highlights the ways that economic developers have shaped the domain, community, and practice of economic development to facilitate social processes of shared learning. Participants in this research describe a community environment where cooperation is an accepted norm, but where collaborative knowledge generation and problem solving could be extended through greater intentional community formation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geoforum\",\"volume\":\"156 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104113\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geoforum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852400174X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geoforum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001671852400174X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Contours of collaboration: Understanding emerging communities of practice in economic development
Economic development is an industry that pits localities against one another in pursuit of vital, community-sustaining jobs. Despite this competitive context, an established literature documents significant benefits to collaboration between economic developers and, notably, practitioners’ awareness of these benefits. While much of the existing literature focuses on the benefits of cooperation or developers’ attitudes toward cooperation, there has been limited emphasis on how these practices evolve in social terms. This paper draws on qualitative interviews with 30 economic developers and allied practitioners to interrogate the dimensions of cooperation in the Midwestern state of Missouri. It argues that we can usefully understand the relationships that shape cooperation between competing practitioners as a distributed community of practice. The study highlights the ways that economic developers have shaped the domain, community, and practice of economic development to facilitate social processes of shared learning. Participants in this research describe a community environment where cooperation is an accepted norm, but where collaborative knowledge generation and problem solving could be extended through greater intentional community formation.
期刊介绍:
Geoforum is an international, inter-disciplinary journal, global in outlook, and integrative in approach. The broad focus of Geoforum is the organisation of economic, political, social and environmental systems through space and over time. Areas of study range from the analysis of the global political economy and environment, through national systems of regulation and governance, to urban and regional development, local economic and urban planning and resources management. The journal also includes a Critical Review section which features critical assessments of research in all the above areas.