使用校准的 Riedel-Hiermaier-Thoma 构成模型,分析各种应力状态和应变率下 Nehbandan 花岗岩的破坏情况

IF 3.9 2区 工程技术 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS
Hooman Rouhani, Ebrahim Farrokh
{"title":"使用校准的 Riedel-Hiermaier-Thoma 构成模型,分析各种应力状态和应变率下 Nehbandan 花岗岩的破坏情况","authors":"Hooman Rouhani, Ebrahim Farrokh","doi":"10.1007/s40948-024-00876-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This study presents a comprehensive procedure for determining, calibrating, and validating the Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT) material model parameters for granite. The process involves collecting a comprehensive dataset of conventional mechanical tests conducted on various types of granite worldwide. Based on this dataset, one set of RHT material model parameters is determined. Additionally, a specific granite sample from Iran, known as Nehbandan granite, is characterized through physical and mechanical testing to obtain another set of parameters. The challenging task of determining the third set of parameters, which are difficult to obtain analytically and experimentally, is accomplished through a calibration process that iteratively adjusts the parameters based on comparisons between numerical simulation results and experimental data. To validate the determined parameters, a series of tests, including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), triaxial compressive strength (TCS), Brazilian tensile strength, and dynamic Brazilian using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests, are conducted on the Nehbandan granite. These tests are also simulated using LS-Dyna software, and the numerical simulation results are compared with the corresponding experimental test results. The comparison between the numerical and experimental data serves as a means of validating and verifying the accuracy and reliability of the determined RHT material model parameters for granite. The results demonstrate the successful determination and calibration of the RHT material model parameters for granite. The model exhibits effectiveness in predicting the behavior of granite under various loading conditions. The validation process confirms the accuracy and reliability of the determined parameters through a close agreement between numerical simulations and experimental data. The findings contribute to a better understanding of granite's mechanical response and provide a reliable tool for simulating and predicting its behavior in engineering applications. The validated RHT material model parameters offer a robust framework for accurate numerical simulations, enabling engineers to make informed decisions in rock engineering projects.</p>","PeriodicalId":12813,"journal":{"name":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","volume":"107 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Failure analysis of Nehbandan granite under various stress states and strain rates using a calibrated Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma constitutive model\",\"authors\":\"Hooman Rouhani, Ebrahim Farrokh\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40948-024-00876-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This study presents a comprehensive procedure for determining, calibrating, and validating the Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT) material model parameters for granite. The process involves collecting a comprehensive dataset of conventional mechanical tests conducted on various types of granite worldwide. Based on this dataset, one set of RHT material model parameters is determined. Additionally, a specific granite sample from Iran, known as Nehbandan granite, is characterized through physical and mechanical testing to obtain another set of parameters. The challenging task of determining the third set of parameters, which are difficult to obtain analytically and experimentally, is accomplished through a calibration process that iteratively adjusts the parameters based on comparisons between numerical simulation results and experimental data. To validate the determined parameters, a series of tests, including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), triaxial compressive strength (TCS), Brazilian tensile strength, and dynamic Brazilian using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests, are conducted on the Nehbandan granite. These tests are also simulated using LS-Dyna software, and the numerical simulation results are compared with the corresponding experimental test results. The comparison between the numerical and experimental data serves as a means of validating and verifying the accuracy and reliability of the determined RHT material model parameters for granite. The results demonstrate the successful determination and calibration of the RHT material model parameters for granite. The model exhibits effectiveness in predicting the behavior of granite under various loading conditions. The validation process confirms the accuracy and reliability of the determined parameters through a close agreement between numerical simulations and experimental data. The findings contribute to a better understanding of granite's mechanical response and provide a reliable tool for simulating and predicting its behavior in engineering applications. The validated RHT material model parameters offer a robust framework for accurate numerical simulations, enabling engineers to make informed decisions in rock engineering projects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12813,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources\",\"volume\":\"107 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00876-5\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40948-024-00876-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究提出了一个全面的程序,用于确定、校准和验证花岗岩的里德尔-希尔迈尔-托马(RHT)材料模型参数。这一过程包括收集对全球各类花岗岩进行的常规力学测试的综合数据集。在此数据集的基础上,确定了一套 RHT 材料模型参数。此外,还通过物理和机械测试对伊朗的特定花岗岩样本(即 Nehbandan 花岗岩)进行表征,以获得另一组参数。第三组参数很难通过分析和实验获得,确定这组参数的挑战性任务是通过校准过程完成的,该过程根据数值模拟结果和实验数据之间的比较对参数进行迭代调整。为了验证确定的参数,在 Nehbandan 花岗岩上进行了一系列试验,包括单轴抗压强度(UCS)、三轴抗压强度(TCS)、巴西抗拉强度和使用分裂霍普金森压力棒(SHPB)进行的巴西动态试验。还使用 LS-Dyna 软件模拟了这些试验,并将数值模拟结果与相应的试验结果进行了比较。通过比较数值和实验数据,可以验证和核实所确定的花岗岩 RHT 材料模型参数的准确性和可靠性。结果表明花岗岩 RHT 材料模型参数的确定和校准是成功的。该模型能有效预测花岗岩在各种加载条件下的行为。验证过程通过数值模拟和实验数据之间的密切吻合,证实了所确定参数的准确性和可靠性。这些发现有助于更好地理解花岗岩的机械响应,并为模拟和预测其在工程应用中的行为提供了可靠的工具。经过验证的 RHT 材料模型参数为精确的数值模拟提供了一个强大的框架,使工程师能够在岩石工程项目中做出明智的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Failure analysis of Nehbandan granite under various stress states and strain rates using a calibrated Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma constitutive model

Failure analysis of Nehbandan granite under various stress states and strain rates using a calibrated Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma constitutive model

This study presents a comprehensive procedure for determining, calibrating, and validating the Riedel–Hiermaier–Thoma (RHT) material model parameters for granite. The process involves collecting a comprehensive dataset of conventional mechanical tests conducted on various types of granite worldwide. Based on this dataset, one set of RHT material model parameters is determined. Additionally, a specific granite sample from Iran, known as Nehbandan granite, is characterized through physical and mechanical testing to obtain another set of parameters. The challenging task of determining the third set of parameters, which are difficult to obtain analytically and experimentally, is accomplished through a calibration process that iteratively adjusts the parameters based on comparisons between numerical simulation results and experimental data. To validate the determined parameters, a series of tests, including uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), triaxial compressive strength (TCS), Brazilian tensile strength, and dynamic Brazilian using split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) tests, are conducted on the Nehbandan granite. These tests are also simulated using LS-Dyna software, and the numerical simulation results are compared with the corresponding experimental test results. The comparison between the numerical and experimental data serves as a means of validating and verifying the accuracy and reliability of the determined RHT material model parameters for granite. The results demonstrate the successful determination and calibration of the RHT material model parameters for granite. The model exhibits effectiveness in predicting the behavior of granite under various loading conditions. The validation process confirms the accuracy and reliability of the determined parameters through a close agreement between numerical simulations and experimental data. The findings contribute to a better understanding of granite's mechanical response and provide a reliable tool for simulating and predicting its behavior in engineering applications. The validated RHT material model parameters offer a robust framework for accurate numerical simulations, enabling engineers to make informed decisions in rock engineering projects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources
Geomechanics and Geophysics for Geo-Energy and Geo-Resources Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geophysics
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.00%
发文量
163
期刊介绍: This journal offers original research, new developments, and case studies in geomechanics and geophysics, focused on energy and resources in Earth’s subsurface. Covers theory, experimental results, numerical methods, modeling, engineering, technology and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信