{"title":"PTW 34070 大面积平行电离室在临床质子扫描束中的长期稳定性","authors":"Masashi Yamanaka, Yutaro Mori, Kazuki Matsumoto, Shunsuke Moriya, Akihiro Yamano, Takahiro Shimo, Ryosuke Shirata, Kazunori Nitta, Hironori Nagata, Koichi Tokuuye","doi":"10.1002/acm2.14525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>In the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel-plate ionization chamber. The long-term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long-term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>The long-term stability evaluation focused on the BPC-Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono-energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono-energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono-energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"25 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14525","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-term stability of a PTW 34070 large-area parallel ionization chamber in clinical proton scanning beams\",\"authors\":\"Masashi Yamanaka, Yutaro Mori, Kazuki Matsumoto, Shunsuke Moriya, Akihiro Yamano, Takahiro Shimo, Ryosuke Shirata, Kazunori Nitta, Hironori Nagata, Koichi Tokuuye\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acm2.14525\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>In the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel-plate ionization chamber. The long-term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long-term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>The long-term stability evaluation focused on the BPC-Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono-energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono-energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono-energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"volume\":\"25 12\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.14525\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14525\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.14525","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Long-term stability of a PTW 34070 large-area parallel ionization chamber in clinical proton scanning beams
Purpose
In the modeling of beam data for proton therapy planning systems, absolute dose measurements are performed utilizing a Bragg peak chamber (BPC), which is a parallel-plate ionization chamber. The long-term stability of the BPC is crucial for ensuring accurate absolute dose measurement. The study aims to assess the long-term stability of the BPC in clinical proton pencil beam scanning delivery.
Methods
The long-term stability evaluation focused on the BPC-Type 34070 (PTW Freiburg, Germany), utilizing clinical proton scanning beams from December 2022 to November 2023. Monthly investigations were conducted to evaluate the response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC and a reference chamber, employing the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) field. Additionally, assessments were made regarding the BPC's response to monoenergetic beams, along with an examination of the impact of polarity and ion recombination on the BPC.
Results
The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC varied up to 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively, while the response of the reference chamber remained within a 0.5% range. The BPC's response to the mono-energetic beams varied up to 2.0% across all energies, demonstrating similar variation trends in both the SOBP field and mono-energetic beams. Furthermore, the variations in polarity and ion recombination effect remained stable within a 0.4% range throughout the year. Notably, the reproducibility of the BPC remained high for each measurement conducted, whether for the SOBP field or mono-energetic beams, with a maximum deviation observed at 0.1%.
Conclusions
The response and cross-calibration factor of the BPC demonstrated significant variations, with maximum changes of 1.9% and 1.8%, respectively. However, the reproducibility of the BPC remained consistently high for each measurement. It is recommended that when conducting absolute dose measurements using a BPC, its response should be compared and corrected against the reference chamber for each measurement.
期刊介绍：
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission.
JACMP will publish:
-Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500.
-Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed.
-Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references.
-Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents.
-Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews.
-Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics.
-Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
