医护人员对孕前保健的信念和态度:系统回顾

Cherie Caut, Danielle Schoenaker, Erica McIntyre, Amie Steel
{"title":"医护人员对孕前保健的信念和态度:系统回顾","authors":"Cherie Caut, Danielle Schoenaker, Erica McIntyre, Amie Steel","doi":"10.1101/2024.09.16.24313739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background\nHealth professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to 1) synthesise recent literature (past five years) describing health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and 2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than five years ago. Methods\nFive databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 27/01/2022. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach.\nResults\nTwenty-one studies were included (n=8 qualitative, n=11 quantitative, n=2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: 1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), 2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and 3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations).\nConclusions\nLittle has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.","PeriodicalId":501276,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Cherie Caut, Danielle Schoenaker, Erica McIntyre, Amie Steel\",\"doi\":\"10.1101/2024.09.16.24313739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background\\nHealth professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to 1) synthesise recent literature (past five years) describing health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and 2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than five years ago. Methods\\nFive databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 27/01/2022. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach.\\nResults\\nTwenty-one studies were included (n=8 qualitative, n=11 quantitative, n=2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: 1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), 2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and 3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations).\\nConclusions\\nLittle has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"medRxiv - Public and Global Health\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"medRxiv - Public and Global Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Public and Global Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.09.16.24313739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景医护人员以前曾发现各种障碍和因素,这些障碍和因素有助于在医疗保健环境中促进孕前保健服务。自此,与临床相关的孕前信息和临床实践指南应运而生,以帮助医护人员提供孕前保健服务。本系统综述旨在:1)综合近期(过去五年)描述医疗专业人员对孕前保健服务或项目的信念和态度的文献;2)确定与五年前的文献综述相比,医疗专业人员提供孕前保健的经验是否发生了变化。方法在 2016 年 1 月 27 日至 2022 年 1 月 27 日期间检索了五个数据库。凡是对医护人员提供孕前保健服务或项目的信念和态度进行调查的原始定量和定性研究均被纳入。研究质量采用 CASP 检查表(定性研究)和 AXIS 工具(定量研究)进行评估。结果共纳入 21 项研究(定性研究 8 项,定量研究 11 项,混合方法研究 2 项)。定性研究的方法质量普遍较好,但定量研究的方法质量参差不齐。研究结果分为三类1) 解决孕前保健卫生知识普及问题(即缺乏知识、意识、培训和资源),2) 孕前保健的临床实用性(即需要协调保健和明确角色责任),3) 患者的角色(即需要公共卫生教育来支持患者主导的对话)。为了改善孕前保健服务,有必要共同开发专业和公共孕前健康教育、临床资源以及协调的孕前保健服务模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care: A systematic review
Background Health professionals have previously identified various barriers and factors that would help facilitate preconception care services in healthcare settings. Clinically relevant preconception information and clinical practice guidelines have since been developed to aid health professionals in preconception care delivery. This systematic review aimed to 1) synthesise recent literature (past five years) describing health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards preconception care services or programmes and 2) determine if the experience of health professionals providing preconception care has changed compared to literature reviews conducted more than five years ago. Methods Five databases were searched between 27/01/2016 and 27/01/2022. Primary quantitative and qualitative research studies were included if they examined health professionals beliefs and attitudes towards delivering preconception care services or programmes. Study quality was assessed using the CASP Checklist (qualitative studies) and AXIS tool (quantitative studies). Data synthesis used thematic categorisation adapted from the framework approach. Results Twenty-one studies were included (n=8 qualitative, n=11 quantitative, n=2 mixed-methods studies). Methodological quality was generally good for qualitative studies but varied for quantitative studies. The results covered three categories: 1) addressing preconception care health literacy (i.e. lack of knowledge, awareness, training and resources), 2) clinical practicalities of preconception care (i.e. need for coordination of care and clarity on role responsibility), and 3) the role of the patient (i.e. need for public health education to support patient-led conversations). Conclusions Little has changed regarding the barriers and facilitators to providing preconception care reported by health professionals. To improve the provision of preconception care, there is a need to co-develop professional and public preconception health education, clinical resources, and a coordinated preconception healthcare service model.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信