从治疗到康复:妇科病幸存者和照顾者对教育资源可用性的看法

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Jacqueline Galica, Amina Silva, Janet Giroux, Janet Jull, Stuart Peacock, Josée-Lyne Ethier, Hugh Langely, Christine Maheu, Debora Stark, Rupa Patel, Karyn Perry, Julie Francis, Kardi Kennedy, Kathleen Robb
{"title":"从治疗到康复:妇科病幸存者和照顾者对教育资源可用性的看法","authors":"Jacqueline Galica, Amina Silva, Janet Giroux, Janet Jull, Stuart Peacock, Josée-Lyne Ethier, Hugh Langely, Christine Maheu, Debora Stark, Rupa Patel, Karyn Perry, Julie Francis, Kardi Kennedy, Kathleen Robb","doi":"10.1007/s13187-024-02504-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The objective of this study was to understand gynecological cancer (GC) survivors’ and their informal caregivers’ perceptions about the usability of an educational resource to support their transition from primary cancer treatment into surveillance and/or recovery. After developing an empirical- and experiential-informed educational resource, we used a semi-structured questioning process to understand GC survivors and their caregivers’ perceptions about its usability. Data were collected via online focus groups or 1:1 interviews that were audio recorded and transcribed. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Ten participants who were survivors or informal caregivers of cervical, ovarian, or uterine/endometrial cancer participated in two rounds of data collection. We grouped qualitative data into two themes: (1) reputable, relevant, and accessible education reduces uncertainty and promotes connection, and (2) individualized delivery of education provided by trusted cancer clinicians. The transition from treatment to surveillance is a challenging time for which reputable, relevant, and accessible educational resources are useful to facilitate an understanding about and self-management of survivorship-related concerns. Survivors and caregivers look to clinicians to provide reputable education to address their needs. This education should be diverse in content and referred to repeatedly throughout the cancer trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":50246,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cancer Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Treatment to Recovery: Gynecological Survivors’ and Caregivers’ Perspectives About the Usability of an Educational Resource\",\"authors\":\"Jacqueline Galica, Amina Silva, Janet Giroux, Janet Jull, Stuart Peacock, Josée-Lyne Ethier, Hugh Langely, Christine Maheu, Debora Stark, Rupa Patel, Karyn Perry, Julie Francis, Kardi Kennedy, Kathleen Robb\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s13187-024-02504-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The objective of this study was to understand gynecological cancer (GC) survivors’ and their informal caregivers’ perceptions about the usability of an educational resource to support their transition from primary cancer treatment into surveillance and/or recovery. After developing an empirical- and experiential-informed educational resource, we used a semi-structured questioning process to understand GC survivors and their caregivers’ perceptions about its usability. Data were collected via online focus groups or 1:1 interviews that were audio recorded and transcribed. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Ten participants who were survivors or informal caregivers of cervical, ovarian, or uterine/endometrial cancer participated in two rounds of data collection. We grouped qualitative data into two themes: (1) reputable, relevant, and accessible education reduces uncertainty and promotes connection, and (2) individualized delivery of education provided by trusted cancer clinicians. The transition from treatment to surveillance is a challenging time for which reputable, relevant, and accessible educational resources are useful to facilitate an understanding about and self-management of survivorship-related concerns. Survivors and caregivers look to clinicians to provide reputable education to address their needs. This education should be diverse in content and referred to repeatedly throughout the cancer trajectory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50246,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cancer Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02504-y\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cancer Education","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-024-02504-y","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究的目的是了解妇科癌症(GC)幸存者及其非正式护理人员对教育资源可用性的看法,以支持他们从原发性癌症治疗过渡到监测和/或康复。在开发了以经验和体验为基础的教育资源后,我们采用了半结构化提问的方式来了解 GC 幸存者及其照顾者对其可用性的看法。我们通过在线焦点小组或 1:1 访谈收集数据,并进行了录音和转录。我们采用主题分析法对数据进行分析。十位宫颈癌、卵巢癌或子宫癌/子宫内膜癌的幸存者或非正式照顾者参加了两轮数据收集。我们将定性数据归纳为两个主题:(1) 有信誉、相关且易于获取的教育可减少不确定性并促进联系;(2) 由可信赖的癌症临床医生提供个性化教育。从治疗到监测的过渡是一个具有挑战性的时期,在这一时期,声誉良好、相关且易于获取的教育资源有助于促进对幸存者相关问题的了解和自我管理。幸存者和照顾者希望临床医生能够提供有信誉的教育来满足他们的需求。这种教育的内容应多样化,并在整个癌症治疗过程中反复提及。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Treatment to Recovery: Gynecological Survivors’ and Caregivers’ Perspectives About the Usability of an Educational Resource

The objective of this study was to understand gynecological cancer (GC) survivors’ and their informal caregivers’ perceptions about the usability of an educational resource to support their transition from primary cancer treatment into surveillance and/or recovery. After developing an empirical- and experiential-informed educational resource, we used a semi-structured questioning process to understand GC survivors and their caregivers’ perceptions about its usability. Data were collected via online focus groups or 1:1 interviews that were audio recorded and transcribed. We used thematic analysis to analyze the data. Ten participants who were survivors or informal caregivers of cervical, ovarian, or uterine/endometrial cancer participated in two rounds of data collection. We grouped qualitative data into two themes: (1) reputable, relevant, and accessible education reduces uncertainty and promotes connection, and (2) individualized delivery of education provided by trusted cancer clinicians. The transition from treatment to surveillance is a challenging time for which reputable, relevant, and accessible educational resources are useful to facilitate an understanding about and self-management of survivorship-related concerns. Survivors and caregivers look to clinicians to provide reputable education to address their needs. This education should be diverse in content and referred to repeatedly throughout the cancer trajectory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cancer Education
Journal of Cancer Education 医学-医学:信息
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
122
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cancer Education, the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education (AACE) and the European Association for Cancer Education (EACE), is an international, quarterly journal dedicated to the publication of original contributions dealing with the varied aspects of cancer education for physicians, dentists, nurses, students, social workers and other allied health professionals, patients, the general public, and anyone interested in effective education about cancer related issues. Articles featured include reports of original results of educational research, as well as discussions of current problems and techniques in cancer education. Manuscripts are welcome on such subjects as educational methods, instruments, and program evaluation. Suitable topics include teaching of basic science aspects of cancer; the assessment of attitudes toward cancer patient management; the teaching of diagnostic skills relevant to cancer; the evaluation of undergraduate, postgraduate, or continuing education programs; and articles about all aspects of cancer education from prevention to palliative care. We encourage contributions to a special column called Reflections; these articles should relate to the human aspects of dealing with cancer, cancer patients, and their families and finding meaning and support in these efforts. Letters to the Editor (600 words or less) dealing with published articles or matters of current interest are also invited. Also featured are commentary; book and media reviews; and announcements of educational programs, fellowships, and grants. Articles should be limited to no more than ten double-spaced typed pages, and there should be no more than three tables or figures and 25 references. We also encourage brief reports of five typewritten pages or less, with no more than one figure or table and 15 references.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信