脑淀粉样血管病相关炎症中抗淀粉样蛋白-β自身抗体无重复证据

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Emma van den Berg, Rian Roelofs, Lieke Jäkel, Steven M. Greenberg, Andreas Charidimou, Ellis S. van Etten, Delphine Boche, Catharina J. M. Klijn, Floris H. B. M. Schreuder, H. Bea Kuiperij, Marcel M. Verbeek
{"title":"脑淀粉样血管病相关炎症中抗淀粉样蛋白-β自身抗体无重复证据","authors":"Emma van den Berg,&nbsp;Rian Roelofs,&nbsp;Lieke Jäkel,&nbsp;Steven M. Greenberg,&nbsp;Andreas Charidimou,&nbsp;Ellis S. van Etten,&nbsp;Delphine Boche,&nbsp;Catharina J. M. Klijn,&nbsp;Floris H. B. M. Schreuder,&nbsp;H. Bea Kuiperij,&nbsp;Marcel M. Verbeek","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Elevated levels of anti-amyloid-β (anti-Aβ) autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-RI). We aimed to independently validate the immunoassay for quantifying these antibodies and evaluate its diagnostic value for CAA-RI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We replicated the immunoassay to detect CSF anti-Aβ autoantibodies using CSF from CAA-RI patients and non-CAA controls with unrelated disorders and further characterized its performance. Moreover, we conducted a literature review of CAA-RI case reports to investigate neuropathological and CSF evidence of the nature of the inflammatory reaction in CAA-RI.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The assay demonstrated a high background signal in CSF, which increased and corresponded with higher total immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration in CSF (<i>r</i><sub>sp</sub> = 0.51, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Assay levels were not elevated in CAA-RI patients (<i>n</i> = 6) compared to non-CAA controls (<i>n</i> = 20; <i>p</i> = 0.64). Literature review indicated only occasional presence of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells (i.e., antibody-producing cells), alongside the abundant presence of activated microglial cells, T-cells, and other monocyte lineage cells. CSF analysis did not convincingly indicate intrathecal IgG production.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\n \n <p>We were unable to reproduce the reported elevation of anti-Aβ autoantibody concentration in CSF of CAA-RI patients. Our findings instead support nonspecific detection of IgG levels in CSF by the assay. Reviewed CAA-RI case reports suggested a widespread cerebral inflammatory reaction. In conclusion, our findings do not support anti-Aβ autoantibodies as a diagnostic biomarker for CAA-RI.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":"11 10","pages":"2563-2571"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52169","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No replicating evidence for anti-amyloid-β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation\",\"authors\":\"Emma van den Berg,&nbsp;Rian Roelofs,&nbsp;Lieke Jäkel,&nbsp;Steven M. Greenberg,&nbsp;Andreas Charidimou,&nbsp;Ellis S. van Etten,&nbsp;Delphine Boche,&nbsp;Catharina J. M. Klijn,&nbsp;Floris H. B. M. Schreuder,&nbsp;H. Bea Kuiperij,&nbsp;Marcel M. Verbeek\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acn3.52169\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>Elevated levels of anti-amyloid-β (anti-Aβ) autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-RI). We aimed to independently validate the immunoassay for quantifying these antibodies and evaluate its diagnostic value for CAA-RI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We replicated the immunoassay to detect CSF anti-Aβ autoantibodies using CSF from CAA-RI patients and non-CAA controls with unrelated disorders and further characterized its performance. Moreover, we conducted a literature review of CAA-RI case reports to investigate neuropathological and CSF evidence of the nature of the inflammatory reaction in CAA-RI.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The assay demonstrated a high background signal in CSF, which increased and corresponded with higher total immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration in CSF (<i>r</i><sub>sp</sub> = 0.51, <i>p</i> = 0.02). Assay levels were not elevated in CAA-RI patients (<i>n</i> = 6) compared to non-CAA controls (<i>n</i> = 20; <i>p</i> = 0.64). Literature review indicated only occasional presence of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells (i.e., antibody-producing cells), alongside the abundant presence of activated microglial cells, T-cells, and other monocyte lineage cells. CSF analysis did not convincingly indicate intrathecal IgG production.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Interpretation</h3>\\n \\n <p>We were unable to reproduce the reported elevation of anti-Aβ autoantibody concentration in CSF of CAA-RI patients. Our findings instead support nonspecific detection of IgG levels in CSF by the assay. Reviewed CAA-RI case reports suggested a widespread cerebral inflammatory reaction. In conclusion, our findings do not support anti-Aβ autoantibodies as a diagnostic biomarker for CAA-RI.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"volume\":\"11 10\",\"pages\":\"2563-2571\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acn3.52169\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52169\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acn3.52169","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的脑脊液(CSF)中抗淀粉样蛋白-β(anti-Aβ)自身抗体水平的升高被认为是脑淀粉样血管病相关炎症(CAA-RI)的诊断生物标志物。方法我们使用CAA-RI患者和非CAA对照组的脑脊液复制了检测CSF抗Aβ自身抗体的免疫测定法,并进一步鉴定了其性能。此外,我们还对 CAA-RI 病例报告进行了文献回顾,以调查神经病理学和 CSF 中有关 CAA-RI 炎症反应性质的证据。结果该检测方法在 CSF 中显示出较高的背景信号,随着 CSF 中总免疫球蛋白 G (IgG) 浓度的升高,背景信号也随之升高(rsp = 0.51,p = 0.02)。与非 CAA 对照组(n = 20;p = 0.64)相比,CAA-RI 患者(n = 6)的检测水平没有升高。文献综述显示,除了大量存在活化的小胶质细胞、T 细胞和其他单核细胞系细胞外,B 淋巴细胞和浆细胞(即抗体产生细胞)只是偶尔存在。CSF分析并不能令人信服地表明鞘内IgG的产生。我们的研究结果反而支持用该检测方法非特异性地检测 CSF 中的 IgG 水平。经审查的 CAA-RI 病例报告表明,脑部炎症反应广泛存在。总之,我们的研究结果不支持将抗Aβ自身抗体作为CAA-RI的诊断生物标志物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

No replicating evidence for anti-amyloid-β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation

No replicating evidence for anti-amyloid-β autoantibodies in cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation

Objective

Elevated levels of anti-amyloid-β (anti-Aβ) autoantibodies in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) have been proposed as a diagnostic biomarker for cerebral amyloid angiopathy-related inflammation (CAA-RI). We aimed to independently validate the immunoassay for quantifying these antibodies and evaluate its diagnostic value for CAA-RI.

Methods

We replicated the immunoassay to detect CSF anti-Aβ autoantibodies using CSF from CAA-RI patients and non-CAA controls with unrelated disorders and further characterized its performance. Moreover, we conducted a literature review of CAA-RI case reports to investigate neuropathological and CSF evidence of the nature of the inflammatory reaction in CAA-RI.

Results

The assay demonstrated a high background signal in CSF, which increased and corresponded with higher total immunoglobulin G (IgG) concentration in CSF (rsp = 0.51, p = 0.02). Assay levels were not elevated in CAA-RI patients (n = 6) compared to non-CAA controls (n = 20; p = 0.64). Literature review indicated only occasional presence of B-lymphocytes and plasma cells (i.e., antibody-producing cells), alongside the abundant presence of activated microglial cells, T-cells, and other monocyte lineage cells. CSF analysis did not convincingly indicate intrathecal IgG production.

Interpretation

We were unable to reproduce the reported elevation of anti-Aβ autoantibody concentration in CSF of CAA-RI patients. Our findings instead support nonspecific detection of IgG levels in CSF by the assay. Reviewed CAA-RI case reports suggested a widespread cerebral inflammatory reaction. In conclusion, our findings do not support anti-Aβ autoantibodies as a diagnostic biomarker for CAA-RI.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信