冷原子真空标准中 "闪烁 "碰撞的影响

Stephen P. Eckel, Daniel S. Barker, James A. Fedchak, Jacek Kłos, Julia Scherschligt, Eite Tiesinga
{"title":"冷原子真空标准中 \"闪烁 \"碰撞的影响","authors":"Stephen P. Eckel, Daniel S. Barker, James A. Fedchak, Jacek Kłos, Julia Scherschligt, Eite Tiesinga","doi":"arxiv-2409.11226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We theoretically investigate the effect of ``glancing\" collisions on the\nultra-high vacuum (UHV) pressure readings of the cold atom vacuum standard\n(CAVS), based on either ultracold $^7$Li or $^{87}$Rb atoms. Here, glancing\ncollisions are those collisions between ultracold atoms and room-temperature\nbackground atoms or molecules in the vacuum that do not impart enough kinetic\nenergy to eject an ultracold atom from its trap. Our model is wholly\nprobabilistic and shows that the number of the ultracold atoms remaining in the\ntrap as a function of time is non-exponential. We update the recent results of\na comparison between a traditional pressure standard -- a combined flowmeter\nand dynamic expansion system -- to the CAVS [D.S. Barker, et al.,\narXiv:2302.12143] to reflect the results of our model. We find that the effect\nof glancing collisions shifts the theoretical predictions of the total loss\nrate coefficients for $^7$Li colliding with noble gases or N$_2$ by up to $0.6$\n%. Likewise, we find that in the limit of zero trap depth the experimentally\nextracted loss rate coefficients for $^{87}$Rb colliding with noble gases or\nN$_2$ shift by as much as 2.2 %.","PeriodicalId":501039,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Atomic Physics","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the effect of \\\"glancing\\\" collisions in the cold atom vacuum standard\",\"authors\":\"Stephen P. Eckel, Daniel S. Barker, James A. Fedchak, Jacek Kłos, Julia Scherschligt, Eite Tiesinga\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We theoretically investigate the effect of ``glancing\\\" collisions on the\\nultra-high vacuum (UHV) pressure readings of the cold atom vacuum standard\\n(CAVS), based on either ultracold $^7$Li or $^{87}$Rb atoms. Here, glancing\\ncollisions are those collisions between ultracold atoms and room-temperature\\nbackground atoms or molecules in the vacuum that do not impart enough kinetic\\nenergy to eject an ultracold atom from its trap. Our model is wholly\\nprobabilistic and shows that the number of the ultracold atoms remaining in the\\ntrap as a function of time is non-exponential. We update the recent results of\\na comparison between a traditional pressure standard -- a combined flowmeter\\nand dynamic expansion system -- to the CAVS [D.S. Barker, et al.,\\narXiv:2302.12143] to reflect the results of our model. We find that the effect\\nof glancing collisions shifts the theoretical predictions of the total loss\\nrate coefficients for $^7$Li colliding with noble gases or N$_2$ by up to $0.6$\\n%. Likewise, we find that in the limit of zero trap depth the experimentally\\nextracted loss rate coefficients for $^{87}$Rb colliding with noble gases or\\nN$_2$ shift by as much as 2.2 %.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501039,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atomic Physics\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Atomic Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Atomic Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们从理论上研究了 "闪烁 "碰撞对冷原子真空标准(CAVS)超高真空(UHV)压力读数的影响,该标准基于超冷的 $^7$Li 或 $^{87}$Rb 原子。在这里,闪烁碰撞是指超冷原子与室温背景原子或分子在真空中发生的碰撞,这种碰撞不会产生足够的动能将超冷原子从阱中弹出。我们的模型是完全概率性的,它表明留在阱中的超冷原子数量与时间的函数关系是非指数的。我们更新了传统压力标准--流量计和动态膨胀系统的组合--与 CAVS 的最新比较结果[D.S. Barker 等,arXiv:2302.12143],以反映我们模型的结果。我们发现,当 $^7$Li 与惰性气体或 N$_2$ 碰撞时,闪烁碰撞的影响会使总损耗率系数的理论预测值发生最大 0.6% 的偏移。同样,我们发现在阱深度为零的极限下,实验得出的^{87}$Rb与惰性气体或N$_2$碰撞的损耗率系数偏移高达2.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the effect of "glancing" collisions in the cold atom vacuum standard
We theoretically investigate the effect of ``glancing" collisions on the ultra-high vacuum (UHV) pressure readings of the cold atom vacuum standard (CAVS), based on either ultracold $^7$Li or $^{87}$Rb atoms. Here, glancing collisions are those collisions between ultracold atoms and room-temperature background atoms or molecules in the vacuum that do not impart enough kinetic energy to eject an ultracold atom from its trap. Our model is wholly probabilistic and shows that the number of the ultracold atoms remaining in the trap as a function of time is non-exponential. We update the recent results of a comparison between a traditional pressure standard -- a combined flowmeter and dynamic expansion system -- to the CAVS [D.S. Barker, et al., arXiv:2302.12143] to reflect the results of our model. We find that the effect of glancing collisions shifts the theoretical predictions of the total loss rate coefficients for $^7$Li colliding with noble gases or N$_2$ by up to $0.6$ %. Likewise, we find that in the limit of zero trap depth the experimentally extracted loss rate coefficients for $^{87}$Rb colliding with noble gases or N$_2$ shift by as much as 2.2 %.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信