为痴呆症患者共同设计胆碱酯酶抑制剂续用与停用的患者决策咨询辅助工具

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Nagham J. Ailabouni, Wade Thompson, Sarah N. Hilmer, Lyntara Quirke, Janet McNeece, Alice Bourke, Chloe Furst, Emily Reeve
{"title":"为痴呆症患者共同设计胆碱酯酶抑制剂续用与停用的患者决策咨询辅助工具","authors":"Nagham J. Ailabouni, Wade Thompson, Sarah N. Hilmer, Lyntara Quirke, Janet McNeece, Alice Bourke, Chloe Furst, Emily Reeve","doi":"10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background and Objective</h3><p>As dementia progresses, people living with dementia may take high-risk, unnecessary, or ineffective medicines. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) may have benefit in some people with dementia; however, up to one third are continued when no longer necessary or safe. Our aim was to co-design a consult patient decision aid (CPtDA) to support shared decision making between healthcare professionals and consumers about continuing or deprescribing ChEIs.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic process was employed to design and test the CPtDA prototype. First, a steering group composed of healthcare professionals and a consumer representative was assembled. Guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, the steering group defined the CPtDA’s purpose, scope, and target audience and drafted the prototype for further testing. Interviews with consumers and healthcare professionals were conducted to gain feedback on the content, format, structure, comprehensibility and usability of the CPtDA prototype.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>After the steering group developed the CPtDA prototype, interviews were conducted with 11 consumers and six healthcare professionals. The content and format of the decision aid were improved iteratively over three rounds after consolidating the feedback at each round. The main changes included rewording the purpose of the decision aid and simplifying its layout and format. Participants reported that the decision aid is comprehensible and may be useful in practice.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>Limited available resources guide shared decision making about deprescribing. This study resulted in a co-designed and alpha-tested CPtDA for people living with dementia and carers to help them review the ongoing need for their ChEIs. Further research is needed to explore using the CPtDA in practice to support people living with dementia and their carers engage in the shared decision-making process about continuing or deprescribing their ChEIs. Our co-designed CPtDA could help people living with dementia and their carers review their goals of care alongside their healthcare professional. This may prompt conversations about appropriately using ChEIs and increase the uptake of deprescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":11489,"journal":{"name":"Drugs & Aging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia\",\"authors\":\"Nagham J. Ailabouni, Wade Thompson, Sarah N. Hilmer, Lyntara Quirke, Janet McNeece, Alice Bourke, Chloe Furst, Emily Reeve\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background and Objective</h3><p>As dementia progresses, people living with dementia may take high-risk, unnecessary, or ineffective medicines. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) may have benefit in some people with dementia; however, up to one third are continued when no longer necessary or safe. Our aim was to co-design a consult patient decision aid (CPtDA) to support shared decision making between healthcare professionals and consumers about continuing or deprescribing ChEIs.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>A systematic process was employed to design and test the CPtDA prototype. First, a steering group composed of healthcare professionals and a consumer representative was assembled. Guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, the steering group defined the CPtDA’s purpose, scope, and target audience and drafted the prototype for further testing. Interviews with consumers and healthcare professionals were conducted to gain feedback on the content, format, structure, comprehensibility and usability of the CPtDA prototype.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>After the steering group developed the CPtDA prototype, interviews were conducted with 11 consumers and six healthcare professionals. The content and format of the decision aid were improved iteratively over three rounds after consolidating the feedback at each round. The main changes included rewording the purpose of the decision aid and simplifying its layout and format. Participants reported that the decision aid is comprehensible and may be useful in practice.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusions</h3><p>Limited available resources guide shared decision making about deprescribing. This study resulted in a co-designed and alpha-tested CPtDA for people living with dementia and carers to help them review the ongoing need for their ChEIs. Further research is needed to explore using the CPtDA in practice to support people living with dementia and their carers engage in the shared decision-making process about continuing or deprescribing their ChEIs. Our co-designed CPtDA could help people living with dementia and their carers review their goals of care alongside their healthcare professional. This may prompt conversations about appropriately using ChEIs and increase the uptake of deprescribing.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11489,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drugs & Aging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drugs & Aging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40266-024-01146-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的 随着痴呆症的进展,痴呆症患者可能会服用高风险、不必要或无效的药物。胆碱酯酶抑制剂(Cholinesterase inhibitors,ChEIs)可能对某些痴呆症患者有益;然而,多达三分之一的患者在不再需要或安全的情况下继续服药。我们的目标是共同设计一种患者咨询决策辅助工具(CPTDA),以支持医护人员和消费者就继续使用或停用胆碱酯酶抑制剂做出共同决策。首先,成立了一个由医护人员和消费者代表组成的指导小组。在国际患者决策辅助工具标准的指导下,指导小组确定了 CPtDA 的目的、范围和目标受众,并起草了原型供进一步测试。在指导小组开发出 CPtDA 原型后,对 11 名消费者和 6 名医护人员进行了访谈,以获得他们对 CPtDA 原型的内容、格式、结构、可理解性和可用性的反馈意见。在综合了每一轮的反馈意见后,决策辅助工具的内容和格式经过三轮反复改进。主要的修改包括重写辅助决策工具的目的,简化其布局和格式。参与者表示,该辅助决策工具易于理解,在实践中可能很有用。本研究为痴呆症患者和照护者共同设计了 CPtDA,并对其进行了 alpha 测试,以帮助他们审查对其 ChEIs 的持续需求。我们需要进一步研究如何在实践中使用 CPtDA,以支持痴呆症患者及其照护者参与有关继续使用或停用 ChEIs 的共同决策过程。我们共同设计的 CPtDA 可以帮助痴呆患者及其照护者与医护人员一起回顾他们的护理目标。这可能会促进有关适当使用 ChEIs 的对话,并提高处方的使用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia

Co-Designing a Consult Patient Decision Aid for Continuation Versus Deprescribing Cholinesterase Inhibitors in People Living with Dementia

Background and Objective

As dementia progresses, people living with dementia may take high-risk, unnecessary, or ineffective medicines. Cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) may have benefit in some people with dementia; however, up to one third are continued when no longer necessary or safe. Our aim was to co-design a consult patient decision aid (CPtDA) to support shared decision making between healthcare professionals and consumers about continuing or deprescribing ChEIs.

Methods

A systematic process was employed to design and test the CPtDA prototype. First, a steering group composed of healthcare professionals and a consumer representative was assembled. Guided by the International Patient Decision Aids Standards, the steering group defined the CPtDA’s purpose, scope, and target audience and drafted the prototype for further testing. Interviews with consumers and healthcare professionals were conducted to gain feedback on the content, format, structure, comprehensibility and usability of the CPtDA prototype.

Results

After the steering group developed the CPtDA prototype, interviews were conducted with 11 consumers and six healthcare professionals. The content and format of the decision aid were improved iteratively over three rounds after consolidating the feedback at each round. The main changes included rewording the purpose of the decision aid and simplifying its layout and format. Participants reported that the decision aid is comprehensible and may be useful in practice.

Conclusions

Limited available resources guide shared decision making about deprescribing. This study resulted in a co-designed and alpha-tested CPtDA for people living with dementia and carers to help them review the ongoing need for their ChEIs. Further research is needed to explore using the CPtDA in practice to support people living with dementia and their carers engage in the shared decision-making process about continuing or deprescribing their ChEIs. Our co-designed CPtDA could help people living with dementia and their carers review their goals of care alongside their healthcare professional. This may prompt conversations about appropriately using ChEIs and increase the uptake of deprescribing.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drugs & Aging
Drugs & Aging 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
68
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Drugs & Aging delivers essential information on the most important aspects of drug therapy to professionals involved in the care of the elderly. The journal addresses in a timely way the major issues relating to drug therapy in older adults including: the management of specific diseases, particularly those associated with aging, age-related physiological changes impacting drug therapy, drug utilization and prescribing in the elderly, polypharmacy and drug interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信