重症监护患者左心室流出道速度-时间积分手动和自动超声测量的一致性:对 AUTO-VTI® 工具的评估

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Benjamin Louart, Laurent Muller, Baptiste Emond, Nicolas Boulet, Claire Roger
{"title":"重症监护患者左心室流出道速度-时间积分手动和自动超声测量的一致性:对 AUTO-VTI® 工具的评估","authors":"Benjamin Louart, Laurent Muller, Baptiste Emond, Nicolas Boulet, Claire Roger","doi":"10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Transthoracic echocardiography is widely used in intensive care unit (ICU) to manage patients with acute circulatory failure. Recently, automated ultrasound (US) measurement applications have been developed but their clinical performance has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between automated and manual measurements of the velocity–time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTI-LVOT) using the auto-VTI® tool. This prospective, single-center, interventional study included ICU patients with acute circulatory failure. The examination involved two successive manual measurements of VTI-LVOT (mean of 3 consecutive heartbeats in regular sinus rhythm, and 5 heartbeats in irregular rhythm), followed by a measurement using auto-VTI® software. In patients receiving a fluid challenge, trending ability in detecting fluid responsiveness was also evaluated. Seventy patients were included between January 19, 2020, and September 24, 2020, at the Nîmes University Hospital. The feasibility of the auto-VTI® was 94%. The mean difference between the two methods was 11% with limits of agreement from − 19% to 42%. The proportion of agreement at the 15% difference threshold was 68% [58%; 80%]. The precision and least significant change measured for the manual measurement of VTI were 7.4 and 10.5%, respectively, and by inference for the automated method 28% and 40%. The new auto-VTI® tool, despite interesting feasibility, demonstrated an insufficient agreement with a systematic bias and an insufficient precision limiting its implementation in critically ill patients.</p><p><i>Clinical trial registration</i>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04360304.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":"104 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Agreement between manual and automatic ultrasound measurement of the velocity–time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract in intensive care patients: evaluation of the AUTO-VTI® tool\",\"authors\":\"Benjamin Louart, Laurent Muller, Baptiste Emond, Nicolas Boulet, Claire Roger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Transthoracic echocardiography is widely used in intensive care unit (ICU) to manage patients with acute circulatory failure. Recently, automated ultrasound (US) measurement applications have been developed but their clinical performance has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between automated and manual measurements of the velocity–time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTI-LVOT) using the auto-VTI® tool. This prospective, single-center, interventional study included ICU patients with acute circulatory failure. The examination involved two successive manual measurements of VTI-LVOT (mean of 3 consecutive heartbeats in regular sinus rhythm, and 5 heartbeats in irregular rhythm), followed by a measurement using auto-VTI® software. In patients receiving a fluid challenge, trending ability in detecting fluid responsiveness was also evaluated. Seventy patients were included between January 19, 2020, and September 24, 2020, at the Nîmes University Hospital. The feasibility of the auto-VTI® was 94%. The mean difference between the two methods was 11% with limits of agreement from − 19% to 42%. The proportion of agreement at the 15% difference threshold was 68% [58%; 80%]. The precision and least significant change measured for the manual measurement of VTI were 7.4 and 10.5%, respectively, and by inference for the automated method 28% and 40%. The new auto-VTI® tool, despite interesting feasibility, demonstrated an insufficient agreement with a systematic bias and an insufficient precision limiting its implementation in critically ill patients.</p><p><i>Clinical trial registration</i>: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04360304.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"volume\":\"104 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-024-01215-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

经胸超声心动图被广泛应用于重症监护室(ICU),以管理急性循环衰竭患者。最近,自动超声(US)测量应用得到了发展,但其临床表现尚未得到评估。本研究旨在评估使用自动 VTI® 工具自动测量和手动测量左心室流出道速度-时间积分(VTI-LVOT)的一致性。这项前瞻性、单中心、介入性研究包括 ICU 急性循环衰竭患者。检查包括连续两次手动测量 VTI-LVOT (规律窦性心律时连续 3 次心跳的平均值,不规律心律时连续 5 次心跳的平均值),然后使用 auto-VTI® 软件进行测量。在接受液体挑战的患者中,还对检测液体反应性的趋势能力进行了评估。尼姆大学医院在 2020 年 1 月 19 日至 2020 年 9 月 24 日期间纳入了 70 名患者。自动 VTI® 的可行性为 94%。两种方法的平均差异为 11%,一致性范围为 - 19% 至 42%。在 15%的差异临界值下,一致性比例为 68% [58%; 80%]。手动 VTI 测量的精确度和最小显著变化分别为 7.4% 和 10.5%,而自动方法的推断精确度和最小显著变化分别为 28% 和 40%。新的自动 VTI® 工具尽管具有令人感兴趣的可行性,但由于系统性偏差和精确度不足,其在重症患者中的应用受到限制:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT04360304。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Agreement between manual and automatic ultrasound measurement of the velocity–time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract in intensive care patients: evaluation of the AUTO-VTI® tool

Agreement between manual and automatic ultrasound measurement of the velocity–time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract in intensive care patients: evaluation of the AUTO-VTI® tool

Transthoracic echocardiography is widely used in intensive care unit (ICU) to manage patients with acute circulatory failure. Recently, automated ultrasound (US) measurement applications have been developed but their clinical performance has not been evaluated yet. The aim of this study was to assess the agreement between automated and manual measurements of the velocity–time integral in the left ventricular outflow tract (VTI-LVOT) using the auto-VTI® tool. This prospective, single-center, interventional study included ICU patients with acute circulatory failure. The examination involved two successive manual measurements of VTI-LVOT (mean of 3 consecutive heartbeats in regular sinus rhythm, and 5 heartbeats in irregular rhythm), followed by a measurement using auto-VTI® software. In patients receiving a fluid challenge, trending ability in detecting fluid responsiveness was also evaluated. Seventy patients were included between January 19, 2020, and September 24, 2020, at the Nîmes University Hospital. The feasibility of the auto-VTI® was 94%. The mean difference between the two methods was 11% with limits of agreement from − 19% to 42%. The proportion of agreement at the 15% difference threshold was 68% [58%; 80%]. The precision and least significant change measured for the manual measurement of VTI were 7.4 and 10.5%, respectively, and by inference for the automated method 28% and 40%. The new auto-VTI® tool, despite interesting feasibility, demonstrated an insufficient agreement with a systematic bias and an insufficient precision limiting its implementation in critically ill patients.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04360304.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信