Lutz Oettershagen, Athanasios L. Konstantinidis, Fariba Ranjbar, Giuseppe F. Italiano
{"title":"多层网络中一致的强三元封闭性","authors":"Lutz Oettershagen, Athanasios L. Konstantinidis, Fariba Ranjbar, Giuseppe F. Italiano","doi":"arxiv-2409.08405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social network users are commonly connected to hundreds or even thousands of\nother users. However, these ties are not all of equal strength; for example, we\noften are connected to good friends or family members as well as acquaintances.\nInferring the tie strengths is an essential task in social network analysis.\nCommon approaches classify the ties into strong and weak edges based on the\nnetwork topology using the strong triadic closure (STC). The STC states that if\nfor three nodes, $\\textit{A}$, $\\textit{B}$, and $\\textit{C}$, there are strong\nties between $\\textit{A}$ and $\\textit{B}$, as well as $\\textit{A}$ and\n$\\textit{C}$, there has to be a (weak or strong) tie between $\\textit{B}$ and\n$\\textit{C}$. Moreover, a variant of the STC called STC+ allows adding new weak\nedges to obtain improved solutions. Recently, the focus of social network\nanalysis has been shifting from single-layer to multilayer networks due to\ntheir ability to represent complex systems with multiple types of interactions\nor relationships in multiple social network platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn,\nor X (formerly Twitter). However, straightforwardly applying the STC separately\nto each layer of multilayer networks usually leads to inconsistent labelings\nbetween layers. Avoiding such inconsistencies is essential as they contradict\nthe idea that tie strengths represent underlying, consistent truths about the\nrelationships between users. Therefore, we adapt the definitions of the STC and\nSTC+ for multilayer networks and provide ILP formulations to solve the problems\nexactly. Solving the ILPs is computationally costly; hence, we additionally\nprovide an efficient 2-approximation for the STC and a 6-approximation for the\nSTC+ minimization variants. The experiments show that, unlike standard\napproaches, our new highly efficient algorithms lead to consistent strong/weak\nlabelings of the multilayer network edges.","PeriodicalId":501032,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Consistent Strong Triadic Closure in Multilayer Networks\",\"authors\":\"Lutz Oettershagen, Athanasios L. Konstantinidis, Fariba Ranjbar, Giuseppe F. Italiano\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08405\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Social network users are commonly connected to hundreds or even thousands of\\nother users. However, these ties are not all of equal strength; for example, we\\noften are connected to good friends or family members as well as acquaintances.\\nInferring the tie strengths is an essential task in social network analysis.\\nCommon approaches classify the ties into strong and weak edges based on the\\nnetwork topology using the strong triadic closure (STC). The STC states that if\\nfor three nodes, $\\\\textit{A}$, $\\\\textit{B}$, and $\\\\textit{C}$, there are strong\\nties between $\\\\textit{A}$ and $\\\\textit{B}$, as well as $\\\\textit{A}$ and\\n$\\\\textit{C}$, there has to be a (weak or strong) tie between $\\\\textit{B}$ and\\n$\\\\textit{C}$. Moreover, a variant of the STC called STC+ allows adding new weak\\nedges to obtain improved solutions. Recently, the focus of social network\\nanalysis has been shifting from single-layer to multilayer networks due to\\ntheir ability to represent complex systems with multiple types of interactions\\nor relationships in multiple social network platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn,\\nor X (formerly Twitter). However, straightforwardly applying the STC separately\\nto each layer of multilayer networks usually leads to inconsistent labelings\\nbetween layers. Avoiding such inconsistencies is essential as they contradict\\nthe idea that tie strengths represent underlying, consistent truths about the\\nrelationships between users. Therefore, we adapt the definitions of the STC and\\nSTC+ for multilayer networks and provide ILP formulations to solve the problems\\nexactly. Solving the ILPs is computationally costly; hence, we additionally\\nprovide an efficient 2-approximation for the STC and a 6-approximation for the\\nSTC+ minimization variants. The experiments show that, unlike standard\\napproaches, our new highly efficient algorithms lead to consistent strong/weak\\nlabelings of the multilayer network edges.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501032,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08405\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Social and Information Networks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Consistent Strong Triadic Closure in Multilayer Networks
Social network users are commonly connected to hundreds or even thousands of
other users. However, these ties are not all of equal strength; for example, we
often are connected to good friends or family members as well as acquaintances.
Inferring the tie strengths is an essential task in social network analysis.
Common approaches classify the ties into strong and weak edges based on the
network topology using the strong triadic closure (STC). The STC states that if
for three nodes, $\textit{A}$, $\textit{B}$, and $\textit{C}$, there are strong
ties between $\textit{A}$ and $\textit{B}$, as well as $\textit{A}$ and
$\textit{C}$, there has to be a (weak or strong) tie between $\textit{B}$ and
$\textit{C}$. Moreover, a variant of the STC called STC+ allows adding new weak
edges to obtain improved solutions. Recently, the focus of social network
analysis has been shifting from single-layer to multilayer networks due to
their ability to represent complex systems with multiple types of interactions
or relationships in multiple social network platforms like Facebook, LinkedIn,
or X (formerly Twitter). However, straightforwardly applying the STC separately
to each layer of multilayer networks usually leads to inconsistent labelings
between layers. Avoiding such inconsistencies is essential as they contradict
the idea that tie strengths represent underlying, consistent truths about the
relationships between users. Therefore, we adapt the definitions of the STC and
STC+ for multilayer networks and provide ILP formulations to solve the problems
exactly. Solving the ILPs is computationally costly; hence, we additionally
provide an efficient 2-approximation for the STC and a 6-approximation for the
STC+ minimization variants. The experiments show that, unlike standard
approaches, our new highly efficient algorithms lead to consistent strong/weak
labelings of the multilayer network edges.