评估 T2MR® 技术在败血症患者中早期检测 ESKAPEc 病原体的效果

Celestino Bonura, Domenico Graceffa, Salvatore Distefano, Simona De Grazia, Oscar Guzman, Brian Bohn, Mariachiara Ippolito, Salvatore Campanella, Angelica Ancona, Marta Caputo, Pietro Mirasola, Cesira Palmeri, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Antonino Giarratano, Giovanni Maurizio Giammanco, Andrea Cortegiani
{"title":"评估 T2MR® 技术在败血症患者中早期检测 ESKAPEc 病原体的效果","authors":"Celestino Bonura, Domenico Graceffa, Salvatore Distefano, Simona De Grazia, Oscar Guzman, Brian Bohn, Mariachiara Ippolito, Salvatore Campanella, Angelica Ancona, Marta Caputo, Pietro Mirasola, Cesira Palmeri, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Antonino Giarratano, Giovanni Maurizio Giammanco, Andrea Cortegiani","doi":"10.3390/antibiotics13090885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bloodstream infections (BSIs) and sepsis are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Appropriate early antibiotic therapy is crucial for improving the survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock. T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR®) technology may enable fast and sensitive detection of ESKAPEc pathogens directly from whole-blood samples. We aimed to evaluate concordance between the T2Bacteria® Panel and standard blood culture and its impact on antibiotic therapy decisions. We conducted a single-centre retrospective study on patients with sepsis-induced hypotension or septic shock admitted to general, post-operative/neurosurgical, and cardiothoracic Intensive Care Units who were tested with the T2Bacteria® Panel from January 2021 to December 2022. Eighty-five consecutively admitted patients were included, for a total of 85 paired tests. A total of 48 ESKAPEc pathogens were identified by the T2Bacteria® Panel. The concordance rate between the T2Bacteria® Panel and blood cultures was 81% (69/85), with 20 concordant-positive and 49 concordant-negative cases. For the 25 microorganisms grown from accompanying blood cultures, blood pathogen coverage by the T2Bacteria® Panel was 88%. In this cohort of severely ill septic patients, the T2Bacteria® Panel was highly concordant and was able to detect more ESKAPEc pathogens, with a significantly shorter turn-around time compared to conventional blood cultures. The T2Bacteria® Panel also significantly impacted decisions on antibiotic therapy.","PeriodicalId":8151,"journal":{"name":"Antibiotics","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MR®) Technology for the Early Detection of ESKAPEc Pathogens in Septic Patients\",\"authors\":\"Celestino Bonura, Domenico Graceffa, Salvatore Distefano, Simona De Grazia, Oscar Guzman, Brian Bohn, Mariachiara Ippolito, Salvatore Campanella, Angelica Ancona, Marta Caputo, Pietro Mirasola, Cesira Palmeri, Santi Maurizio Raineri, Antonino Giarratano, Giovanni Maurizio Giammanco, Andrea Cortegiani\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/antibiotics13090885\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bloodstream infections (BSIs) and sepsis are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Appropriate early antibiotic therapy is crucial for improving the survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock. T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR®) technology may enable fast and sensitive detection of ESKAPEc pathogens directly from whole-blood samples. We aimed to evaluate concordance between the T2Bacteria® Panel and standard blood culture and its impact on antibiotic therapy decisions. We conducted a single-centre retrospective study on patients with sepsis-induced hypotension or septic shock admitted to general, post-operative/neurosurgical, and cardiothoracic Intensive Care Units who were tested with the T2Bacteria® Panel from January 2021 to December 2022. Eighty-five consecutively admitted patients were included, for a total of 85 paired tests. A total of 48 ESKAPEc pathogens were identified by the T2Bacteria® Panel. The concordance rate between the T2Bacteria® Panel and blood cultures was 81% (69/85), with 20 concordant-positive and 49 concordant-negative cases. For the 25 microorganisms grown from accompanying blood cultures, blood pathogen coverage by the T2Bacteria® Panel was 88%. In this cohort of severely ill septic patients, the T2Bacteria® Panel was highly concordant and was able to detect more ESKAPEc pathogens, with a significantly shorter turn-around time compared to conventional blood cultures. The T2Bacteria® Panel also significantly impacted decisions on antibiotic therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8151,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Antibiotics\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Antibiotics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090885\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics13090885","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

血流感染(BSI)和败血症是发病和死亡的主要原因。适当的早期抗生素治疗对提高败血症和脓毒性休克患者的存活率至关重要。T2MR® 技术可直接从全血样本中快速灵敏地检测 ESKAPEc 病原体。我们旨在评估 T2Bacteria® Panel 与标准血液培养之间的一致性及其对抗生素治疗决策的影响。我们对 2021 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间入住普通病房、术后/神经外科病房和心胸重症监护病房、接受 T2Bacteria® Panel 检测的脓毒症诱发低血压或脓毒性休克患者进行了单中心回顾性研究。共纳入 85 名连续入院的患者,进行了 85 次配对检测。T2Bacteria® Panel共鉴定出48种ESKAPEc病原体。T2Bacteria® Panel 与血液培养的吻合率为 81%(69/85),其中吻合阳性病例 20 例,吻合阴性病例 49 例。对于从随血培养物中培养出的 25 种微生物,T2Bacteria® Panel 的血液病原体覆盖率为 88%。在这组重症脓毒症患者中,T2Bacteria® Panel 的一致性很高,能检测出更多的 ESKAPEc 病原,与传统的血液培养相比,T2Bacteria® Panel 的周转时间大大缩短。T2Bacteria® Panel 还对抗生素治疗的决策产生了重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of T2 Magnetic Resonance (T2MR®) Technology for the Early Detection of ESKAPEc Pathogens in Septic Patients
Bloodstream infections (BSIs) and sepsis are a major cause of morbidity and mortality. Appropriate early antibiotic therapy is crucial for improving the survival of patients with sepsis and septic shock. T2 magnetic resonance (T2MR®) technology may enable fast and sensitive detection of ESKAPEc pathogens directly from whole-blood samples. We aimed to evaluate concordance between the T2Bacteria® Panel and standard blood culture and its impact on antibiotic therapy decisions. We conducted a single-centre retrospective study on patients with sepsis-induced hypotension or septic shock admitted to general, post-operative/neurosurgical, and cardiothoracic Intensive Care Units who were tested with the T2Bacteria® Panel from January 2021 to December 2022. Eighty-five consecutively admitted patients were included, for a total of 85 paired tests. A total of 48 ESKAPEc pathogens were identified by the T2Bacteria® Panel. The concordance rate between the T2Bacteria® Panel and blood cultures was 81% (69/85), with 20 concordant-positive and 49 concordant-negative cases. For the 25 microorganisms grown from accompanying blood cultures, blood pathogen coverage by the T2Bacteria® Panel was 88%. In this cohort of severely ill septic patients, the T2Bacteria® Panel was highly concordant and was able to detect more ESKAPEc pathogens, with a significantly shorter turn-around time compared to conventional blood cultures. The T2Bacteria® Panel also significantly impacted decisions on antibiotic therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信