{"title":"集成传感、通信和计算的联合学习:框架和性能分析","authors":"Yipeng Liang, Qimei Chen, Hao Jiang","doi":"arxiv-2409.11240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the emergence of integrated sensing, communication, and computation\n(ISCC) in the upcoming 6G era, federated learning with ISCC (FL-ISCC),\nintegrating sample collection, local training, and parameter exchange and\naggregation, has garnered increasing interest for enhancing training\nefficiency. Currently, FL-ISCC primarily includes two algorithms: FedAVG-ISCC\nand FedSGD-ISCC. However, the theoretical understanding of the performance and\nadvantages of these algorithms remains limited. To address this gap, we\ninvestigate a general FL-ISCC framework, implementing both FedAVG-ISCC and\nFedSGD-ISCC. We experimentally demonstrate the substantial potential of the\nISCC framework in reducing latency and energy consumption in FL. Furthermore,\nwe provide a theoretical analysis and comparison. The results reveal that:1)\nBoth sample collection and communication errors negatively impact algorithm\nperformance, highlighting the need for careful design to optimize FL-ISCC\napplications. 2) FedAVG-ISCC performs better than FedSGD-ISCC under IID data\ndue to its advantage with multiple local updates. 3) FedSGD-ISCC is more robust\nthan FedAVG-ISCC under non-IID data, where the multiple local updates in\nFedAVG-ISCC worsen performance as non-IID data increases. FedSGD-ISCC maintains\nperformance levels similar to IID conditions. 4) FedSGD-ISCC is more resilient\nto communication errors than FedAVG-ISCC, which suffers from significant\nperformance degradation as communication errors increase.Extensive simulations\nconfirm the effectiveness of the FL-ISCC framework and validate our theoretical\nanalysis.","PeriodicalId":501301,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","volume":"88 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Federated Learning with Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Frameworks and Performance Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Yipeng Liang, Qimei Chen, Hao Jiang\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.11240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the emergence of integrated sensing, communication, and computation\\n(ISCC) in the upcoming 6G era, federated learning with ISCC (FL-ISCC),\\nintegrating sample collection, local training, and parameter exchange and\\naggregation, has garnered increasing interest for enhancing training\\nefficiency. Currently, FL-ISCC primarily includes two algorithms: FedAVG-ISCC\\nand FedSGD-ISCC. However, the theoretical understanding of the performance and\\nadvantages of these algorithms remains limited. To address this gap, we\\ninvestigate a general FL-ISCC framework, implementing both FedAVG-ISCC and\\nFedSGD-ISCC. We experimentally demonstrate the substantial potential of the\\nISCC framework in reducing latency and energy consumption in FL. Furthermore,\\nwe provide a theoretical analysis and comparison. The results reveal that:1)\\nBoth sample collection and communication errors negatively impact algorithm\\nperformance, highlighting the need for careful design to optimize FL-ISCC\\napplications. 2) FedAVG-ISCC performs better than FedSGD-ISCC under IID data\\ndue to its advantage with multiple local updates. 3) FedSGD-ISCC is more robust\\nthan FedAVG-ISCC under non-IID data, where the multiple local updates in\\nFedAVG-ISCC worsen performance as non-IID data increases. FedSGD-ISCC maintains\\nperformance levels similar to IID conditions. 4) FedSGD-ISCC is more resilient\\nto communication errors than FedAVG-ISCC, which suffers from significant\\nperformance degradation as communication errors increase.Extensive simulations\\nconfirm the effectiveness of the FL-ISCC framework and validate our theoretical\\nanalysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501301,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - CS - Machine Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.11240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Federated Learning with Integrated Sensing, Communication, and Computation: Frameworks and Performance Analysis
With the emergence of integrated sensing, communication, and computation
(ISCC) in the upcoming 6G era, federated learning with ISCC (FL-ISCC),
integrating sample collection, local training, and parameter exchange and
aggregation, has garnered increasing interest for enhancing training
efficiency. Currently, FL-ISCC primarily includes two algorithms: FedAVG-ISCC
and FedSGD-ISCC. However, the theoretical understanding of the performance and
advantages of these algorithms remains limited. To address this gap, we
investigate a general FL-ISCC framework, implementing both FedAVG-ISCC and
FedSGD-ISCC. We experimentally demonstrate the substantial potential of the
ISCC framework in reducing latency and energy consumption in FL. Furthermore,
we provide a theoretical analysis and comparison. The results reveal that:1)
Both sample collection and communication errors negatively impact algorithm
performance, highlighting the need for careful design to optimize FL-ISCC
applications. 2) FedAVG-ISCC performs better than FedSGD-ISCC under IID data
due to its advantage with multiple local updates. 3) FedSGD-ISCC is more robust
than FedAVG-ISCC under non-IID data, where the multiple local updates in
FedAVG-ISCC worsen performance as non-IID data increases. FedSGD-ISCC maintains
performance levels similar to IID conditions. 4) FedSGD-ISCC is more resilient
to communication errors than FedAVG-ISCC, which suffers from significant
performance degradation as communication errors increase.Extensive simulations
confirm the effectiveness of the FL-ISCC framework and validate our theoretical
analysis.