饮食干预对慢性肾病代谢性酸中毒的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 TRANSPLANTATION
Sepideh Mahboobi, Rebecca Mollard, Navdeep Tangri, Nicole Askin, Thomas Ferguson, Tahmina Rahman, Rasheda Rabbani, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Dylan Mackay
{"title":"饮食干预对慢性肾病代谢性酸中毒的影响:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Sepideh Mahboobi, Rebecca Mollard, Navdeep Tangri, Nicole Askin, Thomas Ferguson, Tahmina Rahman, Rasheda Rabbani, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Dylan Mackay","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfae200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and hypothesis Metabolic acidosis is a common complication of kidney disease and can result in further disease progression. Alkali therapy has been used to treat metabolic acidosis for decades. However, some concerns have been raised regarding its safety and long-term tolerability. Existing data suggest that dietary interventions can be beneficial in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize findings from studies comparing dietary interventions with placebo/usual care/no treatment in the management of metabolic acidosis in outpatient adults with CKD. Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to June 2022. Our primary outcome measure was change in serum bicarbonate. Any dietary intervention looking to manipulate dietary acid load was considered as an intervention. Data screening and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to pool data. Results Dietary interventions resulted in clinically significant improvement in serum bicarbonate (mean difference (MD):2.98, 95% CI: [0.77, 5.19]; I2: 91%) and higher eGFR levels (MD: 3.16, 95%CI: [0.24, 6.08], I2: 67%) compared to controls. Serum potassium, albumin and body mass index remained unchanged. Dietary interventions were reported to be safe. Subgroup analyses indicated a superiority of plant-based over non-plant-based interventions in the improvement of acid-base balance and eGFR, however, these findings are from low quality and heterogenous studies. Conclusion Our findings support the beneficial effects of dietary interventions aimed at reducing acid or adding base in the management of metabolic acidosis and kidney function in adults with CKD, with no adverse effects on serum potassium and nutritional status. Well-designed clinical trials looking at the treatment of metabolic acidosis with dietary interventions with a focus on adding base through fruit and vegetables are required.","PeriodicalId":19078,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of dietary interventions for metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Sepideh Mahboobi, Rebecca Mollard, Navdeep Tangri, Nicole Askin, Thomas Ferguson, Tahmina Rahman, Rasheda Rabbani, Ahmed M Abou-Setta, Dylan Mackay\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfae200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and hypothesis Metabolic acidosis is a common complication of kidney disease and can result in further disease progression. Alkali therapy has been used to treat metabolic acidosis for decades. However, some concerns have been raised regarding its safety and long-term tolerability. Existing data suggest that dietary interventions can be beneficial in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize findings from studies comparing dietary interventions with placebo/usual care/no treatment in the management of metabolic acidosis in outpatient adults with CKD. Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to June 2022. Our primary outcome measure was change in serum bicarbonate. Any dietary intervention looking to manipulate dietary acid load was considered as an intervention. Data screening and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to pool data. Results Dietary interventions resulted in clinically significant improvement in serum bicarbonate (mean difference (MD):2.98, 95% CI: [0.77, 5.19]; I2: 91%) and higher eGFR levels (MD: 3.16, 95%CI: [0.24, 6.08], I2: 67%) compared to controls. Serum potassium, albumin and body mass index remained unchanged. Dietary interventions were reported to be safe. Subgroup analyses indicated a superiority of plant-based over non-plant-based interventions in the improvement of acid-base balance and eGFR, however, these findings are from low quality and heterogenous studies. Conclusion Our findings support the beneficial effects of dietary interventions aimed at reducing acid or adding base in the management of metabolic acidosis and kidney function in adults with CKD, with no adverse effects on serum potassium and nutritional status. Well-designed clinical trials looking at the treatment of metabolic acidosis with dietary interventions with a focus on adding base through fruit and vegetables are required.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19078,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae200\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPLANTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfae200","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPLANTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与假设 代谢性酸中毒是肾病的常见并发症,可导致病情进一步恶化。几十年来,碱疗法一直被用于治疗代谢性酸中毒。然而,人们对其安全性和长期耐受性表示担忧。现有数据表明,饮食干预对慢性肾病(CKD)的治疗有益。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在总结在门诊成人慢性肾脏病患者代谢性酸中毒的治疗过程中,饮食干预与安慰剂/常规护理/不治疗进行比较的研究结果。方法 对 Medline、Embase、Cochrane Central、CINAHL 和 Web of Science Core Collection 从开始到 2022 年 6 月进行了检索。我们的主要结果指标是血清碳酸氢盐的变化。任何旨在控制膳食酸负荷的膳食干预都被视为干预。数据筛选和提取由两名独立审稿人完成。对数据进行随机效应荟萃分析。结果 与对照组相比,膳食干预能显著改善血清碳酸氢盐(平均差(MD):2.98,95% CI:[0.77,5.19];I2:91%)和提高肾小球滤过率(MD:3.16,95% CI:[0.24,6.08],I2:67%)。血清钾、白蛋白和体重指数保持不变。据报道,饮食干预是安全的。亚组分析表明,在改善酸碱平衡和 eGFR 方面,以植物为基础的干预措施优于非以植物为基础的干预措施,但是,这些研究结果来自于低质量和异质性研究。结论 我们的研究结果表明,旨在减少酸或增加碱的饮食干预措施对控制代谢性酸中毒和慢性肾脏病成人患者的肾功能有益,对血清钾和营养状况无不良影响。需要进行设计良好的临床试验,研究通过饮食干预治疗代谢性酸中毒,重点是通过水果和蔬菜增加碱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effects of dietary interventions for metabolic acidosis in chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Background and hypothesis Metabolic acidosis is a common complication of kidney disease and can result in further disease progression. Alkali therapy has been used to treat metabolic acidosis for decades. However, some concerns have been raised regarding its safety and long-term tolerability. Existing data suggest that dietary interventions can be beneficial in the management of chronic kidney disease (CKD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to summarize findings from studies comparing dietary interventions with placebo/usual care/no treatment in the management of metabolic acidosis in outpatient adults with CKD. Methods Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, and Web of Science Core Collection were searched from inception to June 2022. Our primary outcome measure was change in serum bicarbonate. Any dietary intervention looking to manipulate dietary acid load was considered as an intervention. Data screening and extraction were performed by two independent reviewers. Random effects meta-analysis was performed to pool data. Results Dietary interventions resulted in clinically significant improvement in serum bicarbonate (mean difference (MD):2.98, 95% CI: [0.77, 5.19]; I2: 91%) and higher eGFR levels (MD: 3.16, 95%CI: [0.24, 6.08], I2: 67%) compared to controls. Serum potassium, albumin and body mass index remained unchanged. Dietary interventions were reported to be safe. Subgroup analyses indicated a superiority of plant-based over non-plant-based interventions in the improvement of acid-base balance and eGFR, however, these findings are from low quality and heterogenous studies. Conclusion Our findings support the beneficial effects of dietary interventions aimed at reducing acid or adding base in the management of metabolic acidosis and kidney function in adults with CKD, with no adverse effects on serum potassium and nutritional status. Well-designed clinical trials looking at the treatment of metabolic acidosis with dietary interventions with a focus on adding base through fruit and vegetables are required.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1431
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation (ndt) is the leading nephrology journal in Europe and renowned worldwide, devoted to original clinical and laboratory research in nephrology, dialysis and transplantation. ndt is an official journal of the [ERA-EDTA](http://www.era-edta.org/) (European Renal Association-European Dialysis and Transplant Association). Published monthly, the journal provides an essential resource for researchers and clinicians throughout the world. All research articles in this journal have undergone peer review. Print ISSN: 0931-0509.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信