为什么也应使用 OLS 估算尾指数

Thiago Trafane Oliveira SantosCentral Bank of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil. Department of %Economics, University of Brasilia, Brazil, Daniel Oliveira CajueiroDepartment of Economics, University of Brasilia, Brazil. National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems
{"title":"为什么也应使用 OLS 估算尾指数","authors":"Thiago Trafane Oliveira SantosCentral Bank of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil. Department of %Economics, University of Brasilia, Brazil, Daniel Oliveira CajueiroDepartment of Economics, University of Brasilia, Brazil. National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems","doi":"arxiv-2409.10448","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Even though practitioners often estimate Pareto exponents running OLS\nrank-size regressions, the usual recommendation is to use the Hill MLE with a\nsmall-sample correction instead, due to its unbiasedness and efficiency. In\nthis paper, we advocate that you should also apply OLS in empirical\napplications. On the one hand, we demonstrate that, with a small-sample\ncorrection, the OLS estimator is also unbiased. On the other hand, we show that\nthe MLE assigns significantly greater weight to smaller observations. This\nsuggests that the OLS estimator may outperform the MLE in cases where the\ndistribution is (i) strictly Pareto but only in the upper tail or (ii)\nregularly varying rather than strictly Pareto. We substantiate our theoretical\nfindings with Monte Carlo simulations and real-world applications,\ndemonstrating the practical relevance of the OLS method in estimating tail\nexponents.","PeriodicalId":501293,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why you should also use OLS estimation of tail exponents\",\"authors\":\"Thiago Trafane Oliveira SantosCentral Bank of Brazil, Brasília, Brazil. Department of %Economics, University of Brasilia, Brazil, Daniel Oliveira CajueiroDepartment of Economics, University of Brasilia, Brazil. National Institute of Science and Technology for Complex Systems\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.10448\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Even though practitioners often estimate Pareto exponents running OLS\\nrank-size regressions, the usual recommendation is to use the Hill MLE with a\\nsmall-sample correction instead, due to its unbiasedness and efficiency. In\\nthis paper, we advocate that you should also apply OLS in empirical\\napplications. On the one hand, we demonstrate that, with a small-sample\\ncorrection, the OLS estimator is also unbiased. On the other hand, we show that\\nthe MLE assigns significantly greater weight to smaller observations. This\\nsuggests that the OLS estimator may outperform the MLE in cases where the\\ndistribution is (i) strictly Pareto but only in the upper tail or (ii)\\nregularly varying rather than strictly Pareto. We substantiate our theoretical\\nfindings with Monte Carlo simulations and real-world applications,\\ndemonstrating the practical relevance of the OLS method in estimating tail\\nexponents.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10448\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Econometrics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10448","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管实践者经常使用 OLS秩和回归估计帕累托指数,但通常的建议是使用希尔 MLE 并进行小样本校正,因为它无偏且高效。在本文中,我们主张在实证应用中也应该使用 OLS。一方面,我们证明带小样本校正的 OLS 估计器也是无偏的。另一方面,我们证明 MLE 对较小观测值的权重明显更大。这表明,在分布(i)严格帕累托但仅在上尾部,或(ii)有规律变化而非严格帕累托的情况下,OLS 估计结果可能优于 MLE。我们通过蒙特卡罗模拟和实际应用证实了我们的理论发现,证明了 OLS 方法在估计 tailexponents 中的实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Why you should also use OLS estimation of tail exponents
Even though practitioners often estimate Pareto exponents running OLS rank-size regressions, the usual recommendation is to use the Hill MLE with a small-sample correction instead, due to its unbiasedness and efficiency. In this paper, we advocate that you should also apply OLS in empirical applications. On the one hand, we demonstrate that, with a small-sample correction, the OLS estimator is also unbiased. On the other hand, we show that the MLE assigns significantly greater weight to smaller observations. This suggests that the OLS estimator may outperform the MLE in cases where the distribution is (i) strictly Pareto but only in the upper tail or (ii) regularly varying rather than strictly Pareto. We substantiate our theoretical findings with Monte Carlo simulations and real-world applications, demonstrating the practical relevance of the OLS method in estimating tail exponents.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信