Is it necessary to distinguish between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma with less than 10% of cholangiocarcinoma components versus hepatocellular carcinoma?

Purpose

Whether there are differences in recurrence-free survival (RFS) prognosis between combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) cases with a small proportion of CCA components and HCC cases remains unknown. We aim to investigate the differences in RFS prognosis between cHCC-CCAs with a small proportion of CCA components and HCCs.

Methods

Patients with malignant liver neoplasms who underwent MRI and surgery were prospectively recruited. All cHCC-CCA patients were divided into different groups according to the ratio of CCA components. The primary end point was recurrence-free-survival. Cox regression analysis and Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was used to investigate and compare RFS prognosis.

Results

One hundred sixty-four cHCC-CCA cases and 271 HCC cases were enrolled. There was no significant difference in RFS prognosis between cHCC-CCA cases with a CCA component of < 10% and HCC cases (log rank p = 0.169). There were no significant differences in some major HCC-favoring MR features, such as nonrim APHE (85.7% vs. 81.5%, p = 0.546), nonperipheral washout (80.0% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.534), and enhancing capsule (62.9% vs. 45.4%, p = 0.051) between them. In addition, some clinicopathological findings had no significant differences between cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component of < 10% and HCCs (all p > 0.05).

Conclusions

There were no significant differences in RFS prognosis, major HCC-favoring MRI features, and clinicopathological findings between cHCC-CCAs with a CCA component of < 10% and HCCs. Therefore, we suggest that cHCC-CCAs with pathological diagnosis of less than 10% of CCA components may be treated as HCCs in clinical setting.

Graphical abstract