Catherine Costa Oliveira-Silva,Mateus S Maillard,Raoni Silva,Lidia Vasconcelos de Sá
{"title":"α放射性核素锕-225、砹-211和镭-223在细胞水平上的剂量测定,用于抗阉割前列腺癌骨转移细胞。","authors":"Catherine Costa Oliveira-Silva,Mateus S Maillard,Raoni Silva,Lidia Vasconcelos de Sá","doi":"10.1088/1361-6560/ad7b9a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives
The aim is to evaluate energy deposition in the nucleus and cytoplasm in targeted alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by modeling two cell lines, PC3 (osteolytic) and LNCaP C4-2 (osteoblastic), for actinium-225, astatine-211, and radium-223 and their progeny, using Monte Carlo simulations with the GATE/Geant4 code.
Approach
We developed single cell and cell clusters models and couple them to Monte Carlo simulations performed on the GATE platform version 9.3, setting the GEANT4-DNA physics list emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies. We considered three radionuclide distributions as a sources: the nucleus, the cytoplasm and the whole cell.
Main Results
When the nucleus was considered as a target, the S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies were significantly higher, within 60-90%, than S-values (N←Cy), demonstrating less influence of cytoplasm internalization. When the cytoplasm was considering as a target, the S-values (Cy←Cy) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progeny were significantly higher, within 30-90%, than the S-values (Cy←N). When no progeny migration occurs and the nucleus was considered as the target, the cumulative S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 were significantly higher, within 50- 70%, than the S-values (N←N) computed for At-211, Ac-225, and Ra-223. Comparing the cumulative S-values, Ac-225 and 
Ra-223 therapies is more effective, in terms of deposited energy in a target, than that with At-211.
Significance
The data presented in this research indicates that Ac-225 therapy may be theoptimum choice due to the energy deposited in the nucleus, as long as the recoil effects and redistribution of progeny are understood. In contrast, At-211 is an alternative to avoid progeny migration. However, to completely analyze the efficacy of radionuclide therapy, other parameters must be considered, such as biological half-life, stability of the transport molecule, progeny migration, excretion pathways, and uptake in different organs.
.","PeriodicalId":519254,"journal":{"name":"Physics in Medicine & Biology","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dosimetry at cellular level for the alpha-emitting radionuclides actinium-225, astatine-211 and radium-223 for bone metastasis cells from castration resistant prostate cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Catherine Costa Oliveira-Silva,Mateus S Maillard,Raoni Silva,Lidia Vasconcelos de Sá\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6560/ad7b9a\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives
The aim is to evaluate energy deposition in the nucleus and cytoplasm in targeted alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by modeling two cell lines, PC3 (osteolytic) and LNCaP C4-2 (osteoblastic), for actinium-225, astatine-211, and radium-223 and their progeny, using Monte Carlo simulations with the GATE/Geant4 code.
Approach
We developed single cell and cell clusters models and couple them to Monte Carlo simulations performed on the GATE platform version 9.3, setting the GEANT4-DNA physics list emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies. We considered three radionuclide distributions as a sources: the nucleus, the cytoplasm and the whole cell.
Main Results
When the nucleus was considered as a target, the S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies were significantly higher, within 60-90%, than S-values (N←Cy), demonstrating less influence of cytoplasm internalization. When the cytoplasm was considering as a target, the S-values (Cy←Cy) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progeny were significantly higher, within 30-90%, than the S-values (Cy←N). When no progeny migration occurs and the nucleus was considered as the target, the cumulative S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 were significantly higher, within 50- 70%, than the S-values (N←N) computed for At-211, Ac-225, and Ra-223. Comparing the cumulative S-values, Ac-225 and 
Ra-223 therapies is more effective, in terms of deposited energy in a target, than that with At-211.
Significance
The data presented in this research indicates that Ac-225 therapy may be theoptimum choice due to the energy deposited in the nucleus, as long as the recoil effects and redistribution of progeny are understood. In contrast, At-211 is an alternative to avoid progeny migration. However, to completely analyze the efficacy of radionuclide therapy, other parameters must be considered, such as biological half-life, stability of the transport molecule, progeny migration, excretion pathways, and uptake in different organs.
.\",\"PeriodicalId\":519254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Physics in Medicine & Biology\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Physics in Medicine & Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad7b9a\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics in Medicine & Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6560/ad7b9a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的
通过对PC3(溶骨性)和LNCaP C4-2(成骨性)这两种细胞系进行建模,利用GATE/Geant4代码进行蒙特卡罗模拟,评估锕225、砹211和镭223及其后代在转移性耐阉割前列腺癌的α靶向治疗中细胞核和细胞质中的能量沉积情况。
方法
我们开发了单细胞和细胞簇模型,并将其与在 9.3 版 GATE 平台上进行的蒙特卡罗模拟相结合,为 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 后代设置了 GEANT4-DNA 物理列表 emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna。我们将三种放射性核素分布作为源:细胞核、细胞质和整个细胞。当把细胞核作为目标时,计算出的 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 后代的 S 值(N←N)明显高于 S 值(N←Cy),在 60-90% 之间,这表明细胞质内化的影响较小。当把细胞质作为目标时,计算出的 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 后代的 S 值(Cy←Cy)明显高于 S 值(Cy←N),在 30-90% 之间。当没有发生后代迁移并将细胞核视为目标时,为 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 计算的累积 S 值(N←N)明显高于为 At-211、Ac-225 和 Ra-223 计算的 S 值(N←N),在 50-70% 之间。比较累积 S 值,就目标中沉积的能量而言,Ac-225 和 Ra-223 疗法比 At-211 疗法更有效。相比之下,At-211 是避免后代迁移的另一种选择。然而,要全面分析放射性核素疗法的疗效,还必须考虑其他参数,如生物半衰期、转运分子的稳定性、后代迁移、排泄途径以及不同器官的吸收等。
Dosimetry at cellular level for the alpha-emitting radionuclides actinium-225, astatine-211 and radium-223 for bone metastasis cells from castration resistant prostate cancer.
Objectives
The aim is to evaluate energy deposition in the nucleus and cytoplasm in targeted alpha therapy of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer by modeling two cell lines, PC3 (osteolytic) and LNCaP C4-2 (osteoblastic), for actinium-225, astatine-211, and radium-223 and their progeny, using Monte Carlo simulations with the GATE/Geant4 code.
Approach
We developed single cell and cell clusters models and couple them to Monte Carlo simulations performed on the GATE platform version 9.3, setting the GEANT4-DNA physics list emstandard_opt3_mixed_dna for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies. We considered three radionuclide distributions as a sources: the nucleus, the cytoplasm and the whole cell.
Main Results
When the nucleus was considered as a target, the S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progenies were significantly higher, within 60-90%, than S-values (N←Cy), demonstrating less influence of cytoplasm internalization. When the cytoplasm was considering as a target, the S-values (Cy←Cy) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 progeny were significantly higher, within 30-90%, than the S-values (Cy←N). When no progeny migration occurs and the nucleus was considered as the target, the cumulative S-values (N←N) calculated for At-211, Ac-225 and Ra-223 were significantly higher, within 50- 70%, than the S-values (N←N) computed for At-211, Ac-225, and Ra-223. Comparing the cumulative S-values, Ac-225 and
Ra-223 therapies is more effective, in terms of deposited energy in a target, than that with At-211.
Significance
The data presented in this research indicates that Ac-225 therapy may be theoptimum choice due to the energy deposited in the nucleus, as long as the recoil effects and redistribution of progeny are understood. In contrast, At-211 is an alternative to avoid progeny migration. However, to completely analyze the efficacy of radionuclide therapy, other parameters must be considered, such as biological half-life, stability of the transport molecule, progeny migration, excretion pathways, and uptake in different organs.
.