在科学、权威和责任之间：探索重新思考气候治理的制度逻辑

IF 3 3区社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES

Environmental Policy and Governance Pub Date : 2024-09-13 DOI:10.1002/eet.2126

Sébastien Keiff, David Talbot

{"title":"在科学、权威和责任之间：探索重新思考气候治理的制度逻辑","authors":"Sébastien Keiff, David Talbot","doi":"10.1002/eet.2126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article explores the logics mobilized by stakeholders involved in national climate governance to identify ways of conciliating them for sound governance. Based on the theoretical framework of institutional logics, the study offers an innovative perspective on climate governance and the management of green funds. Content analysis of the briefs submitted (N = 46) to a public hearing in Quebec (Canada) reveals three competing institutional logics: scientific governance, authority‐based governance, and participative governance. The results of this research have significant managerial and political implications for our understanding of the interactions between the different logics and for identifying ways to optimize climate governance. It also addresses essential but under‐researched aspects of national climate governance and green fund management.","PeriodicalId":47396,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Policy and Governance","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Between science, authority, and responsibility: Exploring institutional logics to rethink climate governance\",\"authors\":\"Sébastien Keiff, David Talbot\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/eet.2126\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article explores the logics mobilized by stakeholders involved in national climate governance to identify ways of conciliating them for sound governance. Based on the theoretical framework of institutional logics, the study offers an innovative perspective on climate governance and the management of green funds. Content analysis of the briefs submitted (N = 46) to a public hearing in Quebec (Canada) reveals three competing institutional logics: scientific governance, authority‐based governance, and participative governance. The results of this research have significant managerial and political implications for our understanding of the interactions between the different logics and for identifying ways to optimize climate governance. It also addresses essential but under‐researched aspects of national climate governance and green fund management.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Policy and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2126\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Policy and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.2126","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了参与国家气候治理的利益相关方所调动的逻辑，以确定如何协调这些逻辑以实现健全的治理。基于制度逻辑的理论框架，本研究为气候治理和绿色基金的管理提供了一个创新视角。对提交给加拿大魁北克省公开听证会的简报（46 份）进行的内容分析揭示了三种相互竞争的制度逻辑：科学治理、基于权威的治理和参与式治理。这项研究的结果对我们理解不同逻辑之间的相互作用以及确定优化气候治理的方法具有重要的管理和政治意义。它还涉及国家气候治理和绿色基金管理的重要方面，但对这些方面的研究还不够。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Between science, authority, and responsibility: Exploring institutional logics to rethink climate governance

This article explores the logics mobilized by stakeholders involved in national climate governance to identify ways of conciliating them for sound governance. Based on the theoretical framework of institutional logics, the study offers an innovative perspective on climate governance and the management of green funds. Content analysis of the briefs submitted (N = 46) to a public hearing in Quebec (Canada) reveals three competing institutional logics: scientific governance, authority‐based governance, and participative governance. The results of this research have significant managerial and political implications for our understanding of the interactions between the different logics and for identifying ways to optimize climate governance. It also addresses essential but under‐researched aspects of national climate governance and green fund management.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Environmental Policy and Governance ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-

CiteScore

6.10

自引率

13.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Environmental Policy and Governance is an international, inter-disciplinary journal affiliated with the European Society for Ecological Economics (ESEE). The journal seeks to advance interdisciplinary environmental research and its use to support novel solutions in environmental policy and governance. The journal publishes innovative, high quality articles which examine, or are relevant to, the environmental policies that are introduced by governments or the diverse forms of environmental governance that emerge in markets and civil society. The journal includes papers that examine how different forms of policy and governance emerge and exert influence at scales ranging from local to global and in diverse developmental and environmental contexts.