{"title":"I 期联合试验的部分排序贝叶斯逻辑回归模型和计算效率高的操作先验规范方法","authors":"Weishi Chen, Pavel Mozgunov","doi":"arxiv-2409.10352","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Recent years have seen increased interest in combining drug agents and/or\nschedules. Several methods for Phase I combination-escalation trials are\nproposed, among which, the partial ordering continual reassessment method\n(POCRM) gained great attention for its simplicity and good operational\ncharacteristics. However, the one-parameter nature of the POCRM makes it\nrestrictive in more complicated settings such as the inclusion of a control\ngroup. This paper proposes a Bayesian partial ordering logistic model (POBLRM),\nwhich combines partial ordering and the more flexible (than CRM) two-parameter\nlogistic model. Simulation studies show that the POBLRM performs similarly as\nthe POCRM in non-randomised settings. When patients are randomised between the\nexperimental dose-combinations and a control, performance is drastically\nimproved. Most designs require specifying hyper-parameters, often chosen from\nstatistical considerations (operational prior). The conventional \"grid search''\ncalibration approach requires large simulations, which are computationally\ncostly. A novel \"cyclic calibration\" has been proposed to reduce the\ncomputation from multiplicative to additive. Furthermore, calibration processes\nshould consider wide ranges of scenarios of true toxicity probabilities to\navoid bias. A method to reduce scenarios based on scenario-complexities is\nsuggested. This can reduce the computation by more than 500 folds while\nremaining operational characteristics similar to the grid search.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Partial Ordering Bayesian Logistic Regression Model for Phase I Combination Trials and Computationally Efficient Approach to Operational Prior Specification\",\"authors\":\"Weishi Chen, Pavel Mozgunov\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.10352\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Recent years have seen increased interest in combining drug agents and/or\\nschedules. Several methods for Phase I combination-escalation trials are\\nproposed, among which, the partial ordering continual reassessment method\\n(POCRM) gained great attention for its simplicity and good operational\\ncharacteristics. However, the one-parameter nature of the POCRM makes it\\nrestrictive in more complicated settings such as the inclusion of a control\\ngroup. This paper proposes a Bayesian partial ordering logistic model (POBLRM),\\nwhich combines partial ordering and the more flexible (than CRM) two-parameter\\nlogistic model. Simulation studies show that the POBLRM performs similarly as\\nthe POCRM in non-randomised settings. When patients are randomised between the\\nexperimental dose-combinations and a control, performance is drastically\\nimproved. Most designs require specifying hyper-parameters, often chosen from\\nstatistical considerations (operational prior). The conventional \\\"grid search''\\ncalibration approach requires large simulations, which are computationally\\ncostly. A novel \\\"cyclic calibration\\\" has been proposed to reduce the\\ncomputation from multiplicative to additive. Furthermore, calibration processes\\nshould consider wide ranges of scenarios of true toxicity probabilities to\\navoid bias. A method to reduce scenarios based on scenario-complexities is\\nsuggested. This can reduce the computation by more than 500 folds while\\nremaining operational characteristics similar to the grid search.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10352\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10352","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Partial Ordering Bayesian Logistic Regression Model for Phase I Combination Trials and Computationally Efficient Approach to Operational Prior Specification
Recent years have seen increased interest in combining drug agents and/or
schedules. Several methods for Phase I combination-escalation trials are
proposed, among which, the partial ordering continual reassessment method
(POCRM) gained great attention for its simplicity and good operational
characteristics. However, the one-parameter nature of the POCRM makes it
restrictive in more complicated settings such as the inclusion of a control
group. This paper proposes a Bayesian partial ordering logistic model (POBLRM),
which combines partial ordering and the more flexible (than CRM) two-parameter
logistic model. Simulation studies show that the POBLRM performs similarly as
the POCRM in non-randomised settings. When patients are randomised between the
experimental dose-combinations and a control, performance is drastically
improved. Most designs require specifying hyper-parameters, often chosen from
statistical considerations (operational prior). The conventional "grid search''
calibration approach requires large simulations, which are computationally
costly. A novel "cyclic calibration" has been proposed to reduce the
computation from multiplicative to additive. Furthermore, calibration processes
should consider wide ranges of scenarios of true toxicity probabilities to
avoid bias. A method to reduce scenarios based on scenario-complexities is
suggested. This can reduce the computation by more than 500 folds while
remaining operational characteristics similar to the grid search.