Paola Vesco, David Randahl, Håvard Hegre, Stina Högbladh, Mert Can Yilmaz
{"title":"少报的战争死亡人数:通过结构化专家征询进行的概率重新评估","authors":"Paola Vesco, David Randahl, Håvard Hegre, Stina Högbladh, Mert Can Yilmaz","doi":"arxiv-2409.08779","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Event datasets including those provided by Uppsala Conflict Data Program\n(UCDP) are based on reports from the media and international organizations, and\nare likely to suffer from reporting bias. Since the UCDP has strict inclusion\ncriteria, they most likely under-estimate conflict-related deaths, but we do\nnot know by how much. Here, we provide a generalizable, cross-national measure\nof uncertainty around UCDP reported fatalities that is more robust and\nrealistic than UCDP's documented low and high estimates, and make available a\ndataset and R package accounting for the measurement uncertainty. We use a\nstructured expert elicitation combined with statistical modelling to derive a\ndistribution of plausible number of fatalities given the number of\nbattle-related deaths and the type of violence documented by the UCDP. The\nresults can help scholars understand the extent of bias affecting their\nempirical analyses of organized violence and contribute to improve the accuracy\nof conflict forecasting systems.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The underreported death toll of wars: a probabilistic reassessment from a structured expert elicitation\",\"authors\":\"Paola Vesco, David Randahl, Håvard Hegre, Stina Högbladh, Mert Can Yilmaz\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08779\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Event datasets including those provided by Uppsala Conflict Data Program\\n(UCDP) are based on reports from the media and international organizations, and\\nare likely to suffer from reporting bias. Since the UCDP has strict inclusion\\ncriteria, they most likely under-estimate conflict-related deaths, but we do\\nnot know by how much. Here, we provide a generalizable, cross-national measure\\nof uncertainty around UCDP reported fatalities that is more robust and\\nrealistic than UCDP's documented low and high estimates, and make available a\\ndataset and R package accounting for the measurement uncertainty. We use a\\nstructured expert elicitation combined with statistical modelling to derive a\\ndistribution of plausible number of fatalities given the number of\\nbattle-related deaths and the type of violence documented by the UCDP. The\\nresults can help scholars understand the extent of bias affecting their\\nempirical analyses of organized violence and contribute to improve the accuracy\\nof conflict forecasting systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08779\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08779","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
包括乌普萨拉冲突数据计划(Uppsala Conflict Data Program,UCDP)提供的事件数据集都是基于媒体和国际组织的报告,很可能存在报告偏差。由于乌普萨拉冲突数据计划有严格的纳入标准,它们很可能低估了与冲突有关的死亡人数,但我们不知道低估了多少。在此,我们提供了一种可通用的、跨国家的、围绕 UCDP 报告的死亡人数的不确定性测量方法,它比 UCDP 有据可查的低估计值和高估计值更稳健、更现实,并提供了测量不确定性的数据集和 R 软件包。我们使用结构化的专家征询法并结合统计建模,根据 UCDP 记录的与战争有关的死亡人数和暴力类型,推导出合理的死亡人数分布。这些结果有助于学者们了解影响有组织暴力实证分析的偏差程度,并有助于提高冲突预测系统的准确性。
The underreported death toll of wars: a probabilistic reassessment from a structured expert elicitation
Event datasets including those provided by Uppsala Conflict Data Program
(UCDP) are based on reports from the media and international organizations, and
are likely to suffer from reporting bias. Since the UCDP has strict inclusion
criteria, they most likely under-estimate conflict-related deaths, but we do
not know by how much. Here, we provide a generalizable, cross-national measure
of uncertainty around UCDP reported fatalities that is more robust and
realistic than UCDP's documented low and high estimates, and make available a
dataset and R package accounting for the measurement uncertainty. We use a
structured expert elicitation combined with statistical modelling to derive a
distribution of plausible number of fatalities given the number of
battle-related deaths and the type of violence documented by the UCDP. The
results can help scholars understand the extent of bias affecting their
empirical analyses of organized violence and contribute to improve the accuracy
of conflict forecasting systems.