阿尔茨海默病多时间点症状用药的 g 值估算方法与假设策略的比较

Florian Lasch, Lorenzo Guizzaro, Wen Wei Loh
{"title":"阿尔茨海默病多时间点症状用药的 g 值估算方法与假设策略的比较","authors":"Florian Lasch, Lorenzo Guizzaro, Wen Wei Loh","doi":"arxiv-2409.10943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For handling intercurrent events in clinical trials, one of the strategies\noutlined in the ICH E9(R1) addendum targets the hypothetical scenario of\nnon-occurrence of the intercurrent event. While this strategy is often\nimplemented by setting data after the intercurrent event to missing even if\nthey have been collected, g-estimation allows for a more efficient estimation\nby using the information contained in post-IE data. As the g-estimation methods\nhave largely developed outside of randomised clinical trials, optimisations for\nthe application in clinical trials are possible. In this work, we describe and\ninvestigate the performance of modifications to the established g-estimation\nmethods, leveraging the assumption that some intercurrent events are expected\nto have the same impact on the outcome regardless of the timing of their\noccurrence. In a simulation study in Alzheimer disease, the modifications show\na substantial efficiency advantage for the estimation of an estimand that\napplies the hypothetical strategy to the use of symptomatic treatment while\nretaining unbiasedness and adequate type I error control.","PeriodicalId":501425,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of g-estimation approaches for handling symptomatic medication at multiple timepoints in Alzheimer's Disease with a hypothetical strategy\",\"authors\":\"Florian Lasch, Lorenzo Guizzaro, Wen Wei Loh\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.10943\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For handling intercurrent events in clinical trials, one of the strategies\\noutlined in the ICH E9(R1) addendum targets the hypothetical scenario of\\nnon-occurrence of the intercurrent event. While this strategy is often\\nimplemented by setting data after the intercurrent event to missing even if\\nthey have been collected, g-estimation allows for a more efficient estimation\\nby using the information contained in post-IE data. As the g-estimation methods\\nhave largely developed outside of randomised clinical trials, optimisations for\\nthe application in clinical trials are possible. In this work, we describe and\\ninvestigate the performance of modifications to the established g-estimation\\nmethods, leveraging the assumption that some intercurrent events are expected\\nto have the same impact on the outcome regardless of the timing of their\\noccurrence. In a simulation study in Alzheimer disease, the modifications show\\na substantial efficiency advantage for the estimation of an estimand that\\napplies the hypothetical strategy to the use of symptomatic treatment while\\nretaining unbiasedness and adequate type I error control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501425,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - STAT - Methodology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10943\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - STAT - Methodology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10943","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在处理临床试验中的并发症时,ICH E9(R1)附录中列出的策略之一是针对并发症不发生的假设情况。实施这一策略的方法通常是将并发症发生后的数据设为缺失(即使已经收集到),而 g 估计法可以利用并发症发生后数据中包含的信息进行更有效的估计。由于 g 估计方法主要是在随机临床试验之外发展起来的,因此有可能在临床试验中进行优化应用。在这项工作中,我们描述并研究了对已建立的 g 估计方法进行修改后的性能,这些修改利用了这样一个假设,即无论发生的时间如何,一些并发症都会对结果产生相同的影响。在一项关于阿尔茨海默病的模拟研究中,修改后的方法在估算将假设策略应用于对症治疗的估算值时显示出巨大的效率优势,同时保持了无偏性和充分的 I 型误差控制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of g-estimation approaches for handling symptomatic medication at multiple timepoints in Alzheimer's Disease with a hypothetical strategy
For handling intercurrent events in clinical trials, one of the strategies outlined in the ICH E9(R1) addendum targets the hypothetical scenario of non-occurrence of the intercurrent event. While this strategy is often implemented by setting data after the intercurrent event to missing even if they have been collected, g-estimation allows for a more efficient estimation by using the information contained in post-IE data. As the g-estimation methods have largely developed outside of randomised clinical trials, optimisations for the application in clinical trials are possible. In this work, we describe and investigate the performance of modifications to the established g-estimation methods, leveraging the assumption that some intercurrent events are expected to have the same impact on the outcome regardless of the timing of their occurrence. In a simulation study in Alzheimer disease, the modifications show a substantial efficiency advantage for the estimation of an estimand that applies the hypothetical strategy to the use of symptomatic treatment while retaining unbiasedness and adequate type I error control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信