探究呼吸护理病房病人签署 "不急救 "令后家属和护士的看法

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Chin-Yun Tsai, Fu-Chih Lai
{"title":"探究呼吸护理病房病人签署 \"不急救 \"令后家属和护士的看法","authors":"Chin-Yun Tsai, Fu-Chih Lai","doi":"10.1177/10499091241285010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of family caregivers and nurses after the signing of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order for patients in respiratory care wards (RCWs). The goal was to facilitate nurses’ preparedness for responding to family reactions and feelings in future DNR situations. Methods: The study employed semi-structured interviews with ventilator-dependent patients’ families and nurses recruited from RCWs in regional and district hospitals in New Taipei City. It explored the feelings, motivations, and decision-making processes concerning DNR orders. Thematic analysis identified key themes and patterns. Results: Twenty-two family members and 12 nurses, caring for 22 patients, participated in the interviews, resulting in 44 interview transcripts. The majority of family members were male (54.5%), whereas all nurses were female. Family caregivers and nurses had nuanced perceptions and showed emotional responses after the signing of DNR orders. Family caregivers grappled with feelings of guilt, uncertainty, and the weight of decision-making, while nurses navigated ethical dilemmas and sought to support families through the process. Common themes included the desire to minimize the patient’s suffering, concerns about quality of life, and the need for clear communication and support. Conclusion: The understanding of family caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of DNR orders for patients in RCWs illuminates complex end-of-life care challenges. A key gap in the study was its limited generalizability due to focusing on specific RCWs. Nonetheless, the insights gained may enable health care providers to tailor support, facilitate informed decision-making, and promote compassionate care for ventilator-dependent patients and their families.","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards\",\"authors\":\"Chin-Yun Tsai, Fu-Chih Lai\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10499091241285010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of family caregivers and nurses after the signing of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order for patients in respiratory care wards (RCWs). The goal was to facilitate nurses’ preparedness for responding to family reactions and feelings in future DNR situations. Methods: The study employed semi-structured interviews with ventilator-dependent patients’ families and nurses recruited from RCWs in regional and district hospitals in New Taipei City. It explored the feelings, motivations, and decision-making processes concerning DNR orders. Thematic analysis identified key themes and patterns. Results: Twenty-two family members and 12 nurses, caring for 22 patients, participated in the interviews, resulting in 44 interview transcripts. The majority of family members were male (54.5%), whereas all nurses were female. Family caregivers and nurses had nuanced perceptions and showed emotional responses after the signing of DNR orders. Family caregivers grappled with feelings of guilt, uncertainty, and the weight of decision-making, while nurses navigated ethical dilemmas and sought to support families through the process. Common themes included the desire to minimize the patient’s suffering, concerns about quality of life, and the need for clear communication and support. Conclusion: The understanding of family caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of DNR orders for patients in RCWs illuminates complex end-of-life care challenges. A key gap in the study was its limited generalizability due to focusing on specific RCWs. Nonetheless, the insights gained may enable health care providers to tailor support, facilitate informed decision-making, and promote compassionate care for ventilator-dependent patients and their families.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241285010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241285010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:本研究旨在探讨呼吸护理病房(RCWs)患者签署 "拒绝复苏"(DNR)指令后,家属护理人员和护士的看法和体验。目的是帮助护士做好准备,以便在未来出现 DNR 情况时应对家属的反应和感受。研究方法:本研究采用半结构式访谈法,访问了呼吸机依赖患者的家属以及新北市区域医院和地区医院呼吸监护病房的护士。研究探究了有关 DNR 命令的感受、动机和决策过程。主题分析确定了关键主题和模式。研究结果22 位家属和 12 位护士参与了访谈,共护理了 22 位患者,访谈记录共 44 份。大多数家庭成员为男性(54.5%),而所有护士均为女性。家属照护者和护士在签署 DNR 命令后有细微的感知并表现出情绪反应。家属照护者努力克服内疚感、不确定性和决策的沉重感,而护士则在伦理困境中徘徊,并努力在这一过程中为家属提供支持。共同的主题包括减少病人痛苦的愿望、对生活质量的担忧以及明确沟通和支持的必要性。结论通过了解家庭照护者和护士对临终关怀病人的 DNR 命令的看法,可以发现临终关怀所面临的复杂挑战。这项研究的一个主要不足之处是,由于研究重点放在特定的临终关怀机构,其普遍性有限。尽管如此,所获得的洞察力仍可帮助医疗服务提供者为依赖呼吸机的患者及其家属提供量身定制的支持、促进知情决策并促进富有同情心的护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards
Introduction: This study aimed to explore the perceptions and experiences of family caregivers and nurses after the signing of a do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order for patients in respiratory care wards (RCWs). The goal was to facilitate nurses’ preparedness for responding to family reactions and feelings in future DNR situations. Methods: The study employed semi-structured interviews with ventilator-dependent patients’ families and nurses recruited from RCWs in regional and district hospitals in New Taipei City. It explored the feelings, motivations, and decision-making processes concerning DNR orders. Thematic analysis identified key themes and patterns. Results: Twenty-two family members and 12 nurses, caring for 22 patients, participated in the interviews, resulting in 44 interview transcripts. The majority of family members were male (54.5%), whereas all nurses were female. Family caregivers and nurses had nuanced perceptions and showed emotional responses after the signing of DNR orders. Family caregivers grappled with feelings of guilt, uncertainty, and the weight of decision-making, while nurses navigated ethical dilemmas and sought to support families through the process. Common themes included the desire to minimize the patient’s suffering, concerns about quality of life, and the need for clear communication and support. Conclusion: The understanding of family caregivers’ and nurses’ perceptions of DNR orders for patients in RCWs illuminates complex end-of-life care challenges. A key gap in the study was its limited generalizability due to focusing on specific RCWs. Nonetheless, the insights gained may enable health care providers to tailor support, facilitate informed decision-making, and promote compassionate care for ventilator-dependent patients and their families.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信