少数民族老年人获得姑息关怀和生命终结关怀的经历和机会:范围界定审查

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Narin Aker, Sarah Griffiths, Nuriye Kupeli, Rachael Frost, Pushpa Nair, Kate Walters, Lee Joshua Melo, Nathan Davies
{"title":"少数民族老年人获得姑息关怀和生命终结关怀的经历和机会:范围界定审查","authors":"Narin Aker, Sarah Griffiths, Nuriye Kupeli, Rachael Frost, Pushpa Nair, Kate Walters, Lee Joshua Melo, Nathan Davies","doi":"10.1186/s12904-024-01555-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many older people from minority ethnic groups experience inequalities towards the end of life, including barriers to accessing palliative care. With levels of international migration increasing, there is a need to understand these differences and consider the needs of minority ethnic groups in healthcare policies. This review aimed to map evidence on how older people from minority ethnic groups access and utilise palliative and end of life care, preferences for palliative and end of life care, experiences of palliative and end of life care, and how this varies between minority ethnic groups in different countries, and with different health conditions. Scoping review, following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance. Searches of eight online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Assia, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) and grey literature were undertaken in 2024. Qualitative sources that focused on older people from minority ethnic groups’ and carers’ access to and use of palliative and end of life care were included, as well as those focusing on healthcare professionals’ experiences. Twenty-three sources were included in the review, the majority of which were interview studies from the USA. Findings reflect a range of preferences, inequalities, facilitators and barriers to accessing palliative and end of life care, with themes relating to: (1) Knowledge of hospice and palliative care, (2) societal and structural issues, (3) language and health literacy, (4) migratory experiences, (5) trust in healthcare services and professionals, (6) religion and hope, and (7) cultural values. This review identified areas for healthcare providers to consider developing more culturally appropriate palliative and end of life care practice, including building trust and improving communication, sharing information, reducing language barriers, addressing stigma, and, if relevant, acknowledging the importance of culture and religion. Further qualitative research from an intersectional perspective, such as geographical location or socio-economic status, rather than race, ethnicity, and culture alone, is needed in more diverse geographical settings and on specific health conditions.","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences and access of palliative and end of life care for older people from minority ethnic groups: a scoping review\",\"authors\":\"Narin Aker, Sarah Griffiths, Nuriye Kupeli, Rachael Frost, Pushpa Nair, Kate Walters, Lee Joshua Melo, Nathan Davies\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-024-01555-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many older people from minority ethnic groups experience inequalities towards the end of life, including barriers to accessing palliative care. With levels of international migration increasing, there is a need to understand these differences and consider the needs of minority ethnic groups in healthcare policies. This review aimed to map evidence on how older people from minority ethnic groups access and utilise palliative and end of life care, preferences for palliative and end of life care, experiences of palliative and end of life care, and how this varies between minority ethnic groups in different countries, and with different health conditions. Scoping review, following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance. Searches of eight online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Assia, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) and grey literature were undertaken in 2024. Qualitative sources that focused on older people from minority ethnic groups’ and carers’ access to and use of palliative and end of life care were included, as well as those focusing on healthcare professionals’ experiences. Twenty-three sources were included in the review, the majority of which were interview studies from the USA. Findings reflect a range of preferences, inequalities, facilitators and barriers to accessing palliative and end of life care, with themes relating to: (1) Knowledge of hospice and palliative care, (2) societal and structural issues, (3) language and health literacy, (4) migratory experiences, (5) trust in healthcare services and professionals, (6) religion and hope, and (7) cultural values. This review identified areas for healthcare providers to consider developing more culturally appropriate palliative and end of life care practice, including building trust and improving communication, sharing information, reducing language barriers, addressing stigma, and, if relevant, acknowledging the importance of culture and religion. Further qualitative research from an intersectional perspective, such as geographical location or socio-economic status, rather than race, ethnicity, and culture alone, is needed in more diverse geographical settings and on specific health conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01555-8\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-024-01555-8","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

许多少数族裔群体的老年人在临终前遭遇不平等待遇,包括在获得姑息关怀方面的障碍。随着国际移民人数的增加,有必要了解这些差异,并在医疗保健政策中考虑少数民族群体的需求。本综述旨在搜集证据,说明少数民族老年人如何获得和利用姑息关怀和临终关怀服务、对姑息关怀和临终关怀服务的偏好、姑息关怀和临终关怀服务的体验,以及不同国家和不同健康状况的少数民族群体在这方面的差异。按照乔安娜-布里格斯研究所(JBI)的指导进行范围界定审查。2024 年对八个在线数据库(MEDLINE、Embase、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycInfo、Assia、Scopus 和 Cochrane 图书馆)和灰色文献进行了检索。其中包括关注少数民族老年人和照护者获得和使用姑息关怀和生命末期关怀的定性资料,以及关注医护人员经验的资料。23 篇资料被纳入综述,其中大部分是来自美国的访谈研究。研究结果反映了获得姑息关怀和生命末期关怀的一系列偏好、不平等、促进因素和障碍,主题涉及(1) 对临终关怀和姑息关怀的了解,(2) 社会和结构问题,(3) 语言和健康知识,(4) 迁徙经历,(5) 对医疗服务和专业人员的信任,(6) 宗教和希望,以及 (7) 文化价值观。本综述确定了医疗服务提供者应考虑的领域,以制定更适合文化背景的姑息关怀和生命末期关怀实践,包括建立信任和改善沟通、共享信息、减少语言障碍、解决污名化问题,以及在相关情况下承认文化和宗教的重要性。还需要在更多样化的地理环境中,针对特定的健康状况,从交叉角度(如地理位置或社会经济地位,而不仅仅是种族、民族和文化)开展进一步的定性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences and access of palliative and end of life care for older people from minority ethnic groups: a scoping review
Many older people from minority ethnic groups experience inequalities towards the end of life, including barriers to accessing palliative care. With levels of international migration increasing, there is a need to understand these differences and consider the needs of minority ethnic groups in healthcare policies. This review aimed to map evidence on how older people from minority ethnic groups access and utilise palliative and end of life care, preferences for palliative and end of life care, experiences of palliative and end of life care, and how this varies between minority ethnic groups in different countries, and with different health conditions. Scoping review, following Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) guidance. Searches of eight online databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Assia, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library) and grey literature were undertaken in 2024. Qualitative sources that focused on older people from minority ethnic groups’ and carers’ access to and use of palliative and end of life care were included, as well as those focusing on healthcare professionals’ experiences. Twenty-three sources were included in the review, the majority of which were interview studies from the USA. Findings reflect a range of preferences, inequalities, facilitators and barriers to accessing palliative and end of life care, with themes relating to: (1) Knowledge of hospice and palliative care, (2) societal and structural issues, (3) language and health literacy, (4) migratory experiences, (5) trust in healthcare services and professionals, (6) religion and hope, and (7) cultural values. This review identified areas for healthcare providers to consider developing more culturally appropriate palliative and end of life care practice, including building trust and improving communication, sharing information, reducing language barriers, addressing stigma, and, if relevant, acknowledging the importance of culture and religion. Further qualitative research from an intersectional perspective, such as geographical location or socio-economic status, rather than race, ethnicity, and culture alone, is needed in more diverse geographical settings and on specific health conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信