论开放源代码的金融轨道的可行性:无许可共识的经济安全

Jacob D. Leshno, Elaine Shi, Rafael Pass
{"title":"论开放源代码的金融轨道的可行性:无许可共识的经济安全","authors":"Jacob D. Leshno, Elaine Shi, Rafael Pass","doi":"arxiv-2409.08951","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bitcoin demonstrated the possibility of a financial ledger that operates\nwithout the need for a trusted central authority. However, concerns persist\nregarding its security and considerable energy consumption. We assess the\nconsensus protocols that underpin Bitcoin's functionality, questioning whether\nthey can ensure economically meaningful security while maintaining a\npermissionless design that allows free entry of operators. We answer this\naffirmatively by constructing a protocol that guarantees economic security and\npreserves Bitcoin's permissionless design. This protocol's security does not\ndepend on monetary payments to miners or immense electricity consumption, which\nour analysis suggests are ineffective. Our framework integrates economic theory\nwith distributed systems theory, and highlights the role of the protocol's user\ncommunity.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Viability of Open-Source Financial Rails: Economic Security of Permissionless Consensus\",\"authors\":\"Jacob D. Leshno, Elaine Shi, Rafael Pass\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.08951\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Bitcoin demonstrated the possibility of a financial ledger that operates\\nwithout the need for a trusted central authority. However, concerns persist\\nregarding its security and considerable energy consumption. We assess the\\nconsensus protocols that underpin Bitcoin's functionality, questioning whether\\nthey can ensure economically meaningful security while maintaining a\\npermissionless design that allows free entry of operators. We answer this\\naffirmatively by constructing a protocol that guarantees economic security and\\npreserves Bitcoin's permissionless design. This protocol's security does not\\ndepend on monetary payments to miners or immense electricity consumption, which\\nour analysis suggests are ineffective. Our framework integrates economic theory\\nwith distributed systems theory, and highlights the role of the protocol's user\\ncommunity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08951\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.08951","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比特币展示了无需可信中央机构即可运行的金融分类账的可能性。然而,人们对比特币的安全性和可观的能源消耗一直存在担忧。我们对支撑比特币功能的共识协议进行了评估,质疑它们是否能在确保经济意义上的安全性的同时,保持允许操作者自由进入的无权限设计。我们通过构建一个既能保证经济安全,又能保留比特币无权限设计的协议,肯定地回答了这个问题。该协议的安全性并不依赖于对矿工的货币支付或巨大的电力消耗,而我们的分析表明这些都是无效的。我们的框架整合了经济理论和分布式系统理论,并强调了协议用户群的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Viability of Open-Source Financial Rails: Economic Security of Permissionless Consensus
Bitcoin demonstrated the possibility of a financial ledger that operates without the need for a trusted central authority. However, concerns persist regarding its security and considerable energy consumption. We assess the consensus protocols that underpin Bitcoin's functionality, questioning whether they can ensure economically meaningful security while maintaining a permissionless design that allows free entry of operators. We answer this affirmatively by constructing a protocol that guarantees economic security and preserves Bitcoin's permissionless design. This protocol's security does not depend on monetary payments to miners or immense electricity consumption, which our analysis suggests are ineffective. Our framework integrates economic theory with distributed systems theory, and highlights the role of the protocol's user community.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信