通过幼发拉底河流域三合一机器学习概念进行干旱指数时间序列预测

IF 2.7 4区 地球科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Levent Latifoğlu, Savaş Bayram, Gaye Aktürk, Hatice Citakoglu
{"title":"通过幼发拉底河流域三合一机器学习概念进行干旱指数时间序列预测","authors":"Levent Latifoğlu, Savaş Bayram, Gaye Aktürk, Hatice Citakoglu","doi":"10.1007/s12145-024-01471-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Droughts are among the most hazardous and costly natural disasters and are hard to quantify and characterize. Accurate drought forecasting reduces droughts' devastating economic effects on ecosystems and people. Eastern Anatolia is the largest and coldest geographical region of Türkiye. Previous studies lack drought forecasting in the Eastern Anatolia (Upper Mesopotamia) Region, where agriculture is limited due to being under snow most of the year. This study focuses on the Euphrates basin, specifically the Tercan and the Tunceli meteorological stations of the Karasu River sub-basin, a vital Eastern Anatolia Region water resource. In this context, time series of 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) values were created. The Tuned Q-factor Wavelet Transform (TQWT) method and Univariate Feature Ranking Using F-Tests (FSRFtest) were used for pre-processing and feature selection. Several models were created, such as stand-alone, hybrid, and tribrid. Machine Learning (ML) methods such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were conducted for the time series analyses. The GPR approach was concluded to perform better than the ANN and SVM at the Tercan station. In other words, GPR performs better in 80% of cases than SVM and ANN models. At the Tunceli station for the SPI output, SVM, which had a superior performance in 60% of the cases, demonstrated a performance comparable to GPR. At the same time, ANN once again exhibited an inferior performance. Similarly, for the SPEI output at the Tunceli station, no clear superiority was observed between the GPR and ANN methods. Because both methods were successful in 40% of cases. This study contributes by introducing a third concept to the stand-alone and hybrid model comparison of drought forecasting, adding tribrid models. It has been detected that the Hybrid and Tribrid ML methods lead to a 91% and 64% decrease relative root mean square error percentage compared stand-alone ML methods for SPEI and SPI in two stations. While the hybrid model at Tercan station was more successful in 80% of the cases, the hybrid model at Tercan station was more successful in 90% of the cases. While hybrid models were observed to be superior, tribrid models not only demonstrated performance close to the hybrid models but also provided advantages such as reducing computational load and shortening calculation time.</p>","PeriodicalId":49318,"journal":{"name":"Earth Science Informatics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drought index time series forecasting via three-in-one machine learning concept for the Euphrates basin\",\"authors\":\"Levent Latifoğlu, Savaş Bayram, Gaye Aktürk, Hatice Citakoglu\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12145-024-01471-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Droughts are among the most hazardous and costly natural disasters and are hard to quantify and characterize. Accurate drought forecasting reduces droughts' devastating economic effects on ecosystems and people. Eastern Anatolia is the largest and coldest geographical region of Türkiye. Previous studies lack drought forecasting in the Eastern Anatolia (Upper Mesopotamia) Region, where agriculture is limited due to being under snow most of the year. This study focuses on the Euphrates basin, specifically the Tercan and the Tunceli meteorological stations of the Karasu River sub-basin, a vital Eastern Anatolia Region water resource. In this context, time series of 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) values were created. The Tuned Q-factor Wavelet Transform (TQWT) method and Univariate Feature Ranking Using F-Tests (FSRFtest) were used for pre-processing and feature selection. Several models were created, such as stand-alone, hybrid, and tribrid. Machine Learning (ML) methods such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were conducted for the time series analyses. The GPR approach was concluded to perform better than the ANN and SVM at the Tercan station. In other words, GPR performs better in 80% of cases than SVM and ANN models. At the Tunceli station for the SPI output, SVM, which had a superior performance in 60% of the cases, demonstrated a performance comparable to GPR. At the same time, ANN once again exhibited an inferior performance. Similarly, for the SPEI output at the Tunceli station, no clear superiority was observed between the GPR and ANN methods. Because both methods were successful in 40% of cases. This study contributes by introducing a third concept to the stand-alone and hybrid model comparison of drought forecasting, adding tribrid models. It has been detected that the Hybrid and Tribrid ML methods lead to a 91% and 64% decrease relative root mean square error percentage compared stand-alone ML methods for SPEI and SPI in two stations. While the hybrid model at Tercan station was more successful in 80% of the cases, the hybrid model at Tercan station was more successful in 90% of the cases. While hybrid models were observed to be superior, tribrid models not only demonstrated performance close to the hybrid models but also provided advantages such as reducing computational load and shortening calculation time.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth Science Informatics\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth Science Informatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01471-8\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth Science Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-024-01471-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

干旱是危害最大、代价最高的自然灾害之一,而且难以量化和定性。准确的干旱预报可以减少干旱对生态系统和人类造成的破坏性经济影响。东安纳托利亚是土耳其最大、最寒冷的地理区域。以往的研究缺乏对东安纳托利亚(上美索不达米亚)地区的干旱预报,由于该地区全年大部分时间都在积雪之下,农业生产受到限制。本研究侧重于幼发拉底河流域,特别是卡拉苏河子流域的特尔坎和通杰利气象站,卡拉苏河是安纳托利亚东部地区的重要水资源。在这种情况下,创建了 1 个月、3 个月、6 个月、9 个月和 12 个月的标准化降水指数 (SPI) 和标准化降水蒸散指数 (SPEI) 时间序列值。预处理和特征选择采用了调谐 Q 因子小波变换 (TQWT) 方法和使用 F 检验的单变量特征排序 (FSRFtest)。创建了多个模型,如独立模型、混合模型和三重模型。在时间序列分析中使用了人工神经网络(ANN)、高斯过程回归(GPR)和支持向量机(SVM)等机器学习(ML)方法。结论是,在 Tercan 站,GPR 方法的性能优于 ANN 和 SVM。换句话说,在 80% 的情况下,GPR 的性能优于 SVM 和 ANN 模型。在通杰利站的 SPI 输出中,SVM 在 60% 的情况下表现优异,其表现与 GPR 相当。与此同时,ANN 的表现再次逊色。同样,对于通杰利站的 SPEI 输出,GPR 和 ANN 方法也没有明显的优劣之分。因为这两种方法都有 40% 的成功案例。本研究在干旱预报的独立模型和混合模型比较中引入了第三个概念,即增加了三混合模型。研究发现,在两个站点的 SPEI 和 SPI 中,混合和三重混合 ML 方法与独立 ML 方法相比,相对均方根误差分别减少了 91% 和 64%。Tercan 站的混合模型在 80% 的情况下更成功,而 Tercan 站的混合模型在 90% 的情况下更成功。虽然混合模型被认为更优越,但三rid 模型不仅表现出与混合模型接近的性能,还提供了减少计算负荷和缩短计算时间等优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Drought index time series forecasting via three-in-one machine learning concept for the Euphrates basin

Drought index time series forecasting via three-in-one machine learning concept for the Euphrates basin

Droughts are among the most hazardous and costly natural disasters and are hard to quantify and characterize. Accurate drought forecasting reduces droughts' devastating economic effects on ecosystems and people. Eastern Anatolia is the largest and coldest geographical region of Türkiye. Previous studies lack drought forecasting in the Eastern Anatolia (Upper Mesopotamia) Region, where agriculture is limited due to being under snow most of the year. This study focuses on the Euphrates basin, specifically the Tercan and the Tunceli meteorological stations of the Karasu River sub-basin, a vital Eastern Anatolia Region water resource. In this context, time series of 1-, 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and Standardized Precipitation Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI) values were created. The Tuned Q-factor Wavelet Transform (TQWT) method and Univariate Feature Ranking Using F-Tests (FSRFtest) were used for pre-processing and feature selection. Several models were created, such as stand-alone, hybrid, and tribrid. Machine Learning (ML) methods such as Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were conducted for the time series analyses. The GPR approach was concluded to perform better than the ANN and SVM at the Tercan station. In other words, GPR performs better in 80% of cases than SVM and ANN models. At the Tunceli station for the SPI output, SVM, which had a superior performance in 60% of the cases, demonstrated a performance comparable to GPR. At the same time, ANN once again exhibited an inferior performance. Similarly, for the SPEI output at the Tunceli station, no clear superiority was observed between the GPR and ANN methods. Because both methods were successful in 40% of cases. This study contributes by introducing a third concept to the stand-alone and hybrid model comparison of drought forecasting, adding tribrid models. It has been detected that the Hybrid and Tribrid ML methods lead to a 91% and 64% decrease relative root mean square error percentage compared stand-alone ML methods for SPEI and SPI in two stations. While the hybrid model at Tercan station was more successful in 80% of the cases, the hybrid model at Tercan station was more successful in 90% of the cases. While hybrid models were observed to be superior, tribrid models not only demonstrated performance close to the hybrid models but also provided advantages such as reducing computational load and shortening calculation time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Earth Science Informatics
Earth Science Informatics COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.60%
发文量
157
审稿时长
4.3 months
期刊介绍: The Earth Science Informatics [ESIN] journal aims at rapid publication of high-quality, current, cutting-edge, and provocative scientific work in the area of Earth Science Informatics as it relates to Earth systems science and space science. This includes articles on the application of formal and computational methods, computational Earth science, spatial and temporal analyses, and all aspects of computer applications to the acquisition, storage, processing, interchange, and visualization of data and information about the materials, properties, processes, features, and phenomena that occur at all scales and locations in the Earth system’s five components (atmosphere, hydrosphere, geosphere, biosphere, cryosphere) and in space (see "About this journal" for more detail). The quarterly journal publishes research, methodology, and software articles, as well as editorials, comments, and book and software reviews. Review articles of relevant findings, topics, and methodologies are also considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信