琼脂深度对碟片扩散法抗菌药敏感性测试的影响

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 MICROBIOLOGY
Ioana D. Olaru, Sarah Schoeler and Frieder Schaumburg
{"title":"琼脂深度对碟片扩散法抗菌药敏感性测试的影响","authors":"Ioana D. Olaru, Sarah Schoeler and Frieder Schaumburg","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001890","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span>Introduction.</span> The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) specifies the agar depth (4&#177;0.5&#8201;mm) when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Since the infrastructure to produce standardized agar may be lacking in settings with limited resources, we wanted to examine to what extent variation in agar depth affects the inhibition zone diameters of quality control (QC) strains and AST of clinical isolates.\n<span>Methods.</span> The inhibition zone diameters on Mueller&#8211;Hinton II agar with different depths (2&#8211;6&#8201;mm) were tested for various QC strain&#8211;antimicrobial agent combinations using <span>Escherichia coli</span> ATCC 25922, <span>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</span> ATCC 27853 and <span>Staphylococcus aureus</span> ATCC 29213. The relationship between zone diameters at different agar depths and MICs was investigated for 35 clinical isolates (<span>E. coli</span>, <span>Klebsiella pneumoniae</span>, <span>S. aureus</span> and <span>P. aeruginosa</span>) from Sierra Leone using MICs as the reference.\n<span>Results.</span> The inhibition zone diameters were within the acceptance ranges as defined by the EUCAST for the majority of QC strains and antimicrobials, independent of the agar depth. At extreme agar depths, inhibition zones were more frequently out of range. The accuracy of AST varied for clinical isolates at different agar depths for categorical agreement (85.8&#8211;94.6%), major error rate (0.4&#8211;2.1%) and very major error rate (VME: 3.3&#8211;12.5%).\n<span>Conclusions.</span> Even if the QC strains were in the acceptance range at different agar depths, this does not rule out unacceptably high VME rates (&gt;3%) in clinical isolates.","PeriodicalId":16343,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of agar depth on antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion\",\"authors\":\"Ioana D. Olaru, Sarah Schoeler and Frieder Schaumburg\",\"doi\":\"10.1099/jmm.0.001890\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<span>Introduction.</span> The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) specifies the agar depth (4&#177;0.5&#8201;mm) when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Since the infrastructure to produce standardized agar may be lacking in settings with limited resources, we wanted to examine to what extent variation in agar depth affects the inhibition zone diameters of quality control (QC) strains and AST of clinical isolates.\\n<span>Methods.</span> The inhibition zone diameters on Mueller&#8211;Hinton II agar with different depths (2&#8211;6&#8201;mm) were tested for various QC strain&#8211;antimicrobial agent combinations using <span>Escherichia coli</span> ATCC 25922, <span>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</span> ATCC 27853 and <span>Staphylococcus aureus</span> ATCC 29213. The relationship between zone diameters at different agar depths and MICs was investigated for 35 clinical isolates (<span>E. coli</span>, <span>Klebsiella pneumoniae</span>, <span>S. aureus</span> and <span>P. aeruginosa</span>) from Sierra Leone using MICs as the reference.\\n<span>Results.</span> The inhibition zone diameters were within the acceptance ranges as defined by the EUCAST for the majority of QC strains and antimicrobials, independent of the agar depth. At extreme agar depths, inhibition zones were more frequently out of range. The accuracy of AST varied for clinical isolates at different agar depths for categorical agreement (85.8&#8211;94.6%), major error rate (0.4&#8211;2.1%) and very major error rate (VME: 3.3&#8211;12.5%).\\n<span>Conclusions.</span> Even if the QC strains were in the acceptance range at different agar depths, this does not rule out unacceptably high VME rates (&gt;3%) in clinical isolates.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of medical microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001890\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001890","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介。欧洲抗菌药物敏感性检测委员会(EUCAST)规定了进行抗菌药物敏感性检测(AST)时的琼脂深度(4±0.5 毫米)。由于在资源有限的环境中可能缺乏生产标准化琼脂的基础设施,因此我们希望研究琼脂深度的变化在多大程度上会影响质控(QC)菌株的抑菌区直径和临床分离菌株的 AST。使用大肠埃希菌 ATCC 25922、铜绿假单胞菌 ATCC 27853 和金黄色葡萄球菌 ATCC 29213 在不同深度(2–6 mm)的 Mueller–Hinton II 琼脂上测试各种质控菌株–抗菌剂组合的抑菌区直径。以 MICs 为参照,对来自塞拉利昂的 35 个临床分离物(大肠埃希菌、肺炎克雷伯菌、金黄色葡萄球菌和铜绿假单胞菌)的不同琼脂深度的抑菌区直径与 MICs 之间的关系进行了研究。大多数质控菌株和抗菌剂的抑菌区直径都在欧盟食品添加剂和污染物分析委员会(EUCAST)规定的接受范围内,与琼脂深度无关。在琼脂深度极深的情况下,抑菌区更经常超出范围。对于不同琼脂深度的临床分离菌株,AST 的准确性在分类一致率(85.8%;94.6%)、重大错误率(0.4%;2.1%)和极重大错误率(VME:3.3%;12.5%)方面各不相同。即使质控菌株在不同的琼脂深度下都在可接受范围内,也不能排除临床分离物中存在不可接受的高 VME 率(>3%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of agar depth on antimicrobial susceptibility testing by disc diffusion
Introduction. The European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) specifies the agar depth (4±0.5 mm) when performing antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). Since the infrastructure to produce standardized agar may be lacking in settings with limited resources, we wanted to examine to what extent variation in agar depth affects the inhibition zone diameters of quality control (QC) strains and AST of clinical isolates. Methods. The inhibition zone diameters on Mueller–Hinton II agar with different depths (2–6 mm) were tested for various QC strain–antimicrobial agent combinations using Escherichia coli ATCC 25922, Pseudomonas aeruginosa ATCC 27853 and Staphylococcus aureus ATCC 29213. The relationship between zone diameters at different agar depths and MICs was investigated for 35 clinical isolates (E. coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, S. aureus and P. aeruginosa) from Sierra Leone using MICs as the reference. Results. The inhibition zone diameters were within the acceptance ranges as defined by the EUCAST for the majority of QC strains and antimicrobials, independent of the agar depth. At extreme agar depths, inhibition zones were more frequently out of range. The accuracy of AST varied for clinical isolates at different agar depths for categorical agreement (85.8–94.6%), major error rate (0.4–2.1%) and very major error rate (VME: 3.3–12.5%). Conclusions. Even if the QC strains were in the acceptance range at different agar depths, this does not rule out unacceptably high VME rates (>3%) in clinical isolates.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of medical microbiology
Journal of medical microbiology 医学-微生物学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.30%
发文量
143
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Microbiology provides comprehensive coverage of medical, dental and veterinary microbiology, and infectious diseases. We welcome everything from laboratory research to clinical trials, including bacteriology, virology, mycology and parasitology. We publish articles under the following subject categories: Antimicrobial resistance; Clinical microbiology; Disease, diagnosis and diagnostics; Medical mycology; Molecular and microbial epidemiology; Microbiome and microbial ecology in health; One Health; Pathogenesis, virulence and host response; Prevention, therapy and therapeutics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信