巴西用于评估 Liriomyza sativae Blanchard(双翅目:农害螨科)对低风险杀虫剂敏感性和抗药性监测的生物测定盘

IF 1.5 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY
Elisabete Albuquerque dos Santos Benvenuto, Elton Lucio de Araujo, Lílian Maria da Solidade Ribeiro, Keyla Walescka Lopes da Silva, Daniel Lima Pereira, Marcos de Oliveira, Herbert Álvaro Abreu de Siqueira
{"title":"巴西用于评估 Liriomyza sativae Blanchard(双翅目:农害螨科)对低风险杀虫剂敏感性和抗药性监测的生物测定盘","authors":"Elisabete Albuquerque dos Santos Benvenuto, Elton Lucio de Araujo, Lílian Maria da Solidade Ribeiro, Keyla Walescka Lopes da Silva, Daniel Lima Pereira, Marcos de Oliveira, Herbert Álvaro Abreu de Siqueira","doi":"10.1007/s12600-024-01196-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><i>Liriomyza sativae</i> infestations pose a threat to horticultural crops like melon and tomato, causing economic losses of up to 30%, typically managed through insecticide applications. Despite the inherent risk of resistance development in populations, reported cases are still relatively low that may be associated with the practicality of the existing bioassay methods. To address the resistance phenomenon in a species, a practical and reliable method to generate susceptibility data should be used. This study aimed to refine existing bioassay method(s) for <i>Liriomyza</i> against different modes of action and set up the susceptibility status of field populations to cyantraniliprole and spinetoram in Brazil. Using the leaf disc immersion method, individual larvae on leaf discs were transferred to both bioassay trays and acrylic Petri dishes after treating them, and mortality was assessed 48 and 72 h after exposure. Susceptibility parameters varied with arena type, exposure duration, and insecticide. <i>Bioassay tray</i> arenas showed consistency of response compared to acrylic dishes and improved parameters at 72 h exposure among the modes of action assessed. Thus, survey of populations against cyantraniliprole and spinetoram using <i>Bioassay tray</i> arenas showed to be consistent and data suggested resistance evidence in <i>L. sativae</i> populations. Resistance ratio varied from 1.2- (MSR4) to 4.2- (BRN1) and from 1.6- (MSR5) to 7.9-fold (MSR2) for cyantraniliprole and spinetoram, respectively. Diagnostic concentration (10 mg/L) for both insecticides showed survival up to 10% (spinetoram) and 2% (cyantraniliprole). The <i>bioassay tray</i> method may be an alternative to existing methods for toxicological assessments and detection/documenting resistance to insecticides.</p>","PeriodicalId":20220,"journal":{"name":"Phytoparasitica","volume":"201 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bioassay tray for assessing susceptibility of Liriomyza sativae Blanchard (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to reduced-risk insecticides and resistance monitoring in Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Elisabete Albuquerque dos Santos Benvenuto, Elton Lucio de Araujo, Lílian Maria da Solidade Ribeiro, Keyla Walescka Lopes da Silva, Daniel Lima Pereira, Marcos de Oliveira, Herbert Álvaro Abreu de Siqueira\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12600-024-01196-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><i>Liriomyza sativae</i> infestations pose a threat to horticultural crops like melon and tomato, causing economic losses of up to 30%, typically managed through insecticide applications. Despite the inherent risk of resistance development in populations, reported cases are still relatively low that may be associated with the practicality of the existing bioassay methods. To address the resistance phenomenon in a species, a practical and reliable method to generate susceptibility data should be used. This study aimed to refine existing bioassay method(s) for <i>Liriomyza</i> against different modes of action and set up the susceptibility status of field populations to cyantraniliprole and spinetoram in Brazil. Using the leaf disc immersion method, individual larvae on leaf discs were transferred to both bioassay trays and acrylic Petri dishes after treating them, and mortality was assessed 48 and 72 h after exposure. Susceptibility parameters varied with arena type, exposure duration, and insecticide. <i>Bioassay tray</i> arenas showed consistency of response compared to acrylic dishes and improved parameters at 72 h exposure among the modes of action assessed. Thus, survey of populations against cyantraniliprole and spinetoram using <i>Bioassay tray</i> arenas showed to be consistent and data suggested resistance evidence in <i>L. sativae</i> populations. Resistance ratio varied from 1.2- (MSR4) to 4.2- (BRN1) and from 1.6- (MSR5) to 7.9-fold (MSR2) for cyantraniliprole and spinetoram, respectively. Diagnostic concentration (10 mg/L) for both insecticides showed survival up to 10% (spinetoram) and 2% (cyantraniliprole). The <i>bioassay tray</i> method may be an alternative to existing methods for toxicological assessments and detection/documenting resistance to insecticides.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20220,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Phytoparasitica\",\"volume\":\"201 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Phytoparasitica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01196-w\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Phytoparasitica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12600-024-01196-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Liriomyza sativae 侵害对甜瓜和番茄等园艺作物构成威胁,造成的经济损失高达 30%,通常通过施用杀虫剂来控制。尽管种群中存在抗药性发展的固有风险,但报告的案例仍然相对较少,这可能与现有生物测定方法的实用性有关。要解决一个物种的抗药性现象,应采用一种实用可靠的方法来生成药敏性数据。本研究旨在改进针对不同作用模式的现有生物测定方法,并确定巴西田间种群对氰烯菌酯和辛硫磷的药敏性状况。使用叶盘浸泡法,在处理叶盘后将叶盘上的幼虫转移到生物测定盘和丙烯酸培养皿中,并在接触 48 和 72 小时后评估死亡率。敏感性参数随试验场类型、接触时间和杀虫剂的不同而变化。与丙烯酸培养皿相比,生物测定盘试验场的反应一致,而且在 72 小时接触后,在所评估的各种作用模式中,生物测定盘试验场的参数都有所改善。因此,使用生物测定盘试验场调查种群对氰虫腈和辛硫磷的抗性表现一致,数据表明褐飞虱种群存在抗性证据。对氰虫腈和辛硫磷的抗性比率分别从 1.2 倍(MSR4)到 4.2 倍(BRN1)不等,从 1.6 倍(MSR5)到 7.9 倍(MSR2)不等。两种杀虫剂的诊断浓度(10 毫克/升)显示,存活率分别为 10%(辛硫磷)和 2%(氰虫腈)。生物测定托盘法可以替代现有的毒理学评估和检测/记录杀虫剂抗药性的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Bioassay tray for assessing susceptibility of Liriomyza sativae Blanchard (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to reduced-risk insecticides and resistance monitoring in Brazil

Bioassay tray for assessing susceptibility of Liriomyza sativae Blanchard (Diptera: Agromyzidae) to reduced-risk insecticides and resistance monitoring in Brazil

Liriomyza sativae infestations pose a threat to horticultural crops like melon and tomato, causing economic losses of up to 30%, typically managed through insecticide applications. Despite the inherent risk of resistance development in populations, reported cases are still relatively low that may be associated with the practicality of the existing bioassay methods. To address the resistance phenomenon in a species, a practical and reliable method to generate susceptibility data should be used. This study aimed to refine existing bioassay method(s) for Liriomyza against different modes of action and set up the susceptibility status of field populations to cyantraniliprole and spinetoram in Brazil. Using the leaf disc immersion method, individual larvae on leaf discs were transferred to both bioassay trays and acrylic Petri dishes after treating them, and mortality was assessed 48 and 72 h after exposure. Susceptibility parameters varied with arena type, exposure duration, and insecticide. Bioassay tray arenas showed consistency of response compared to acrylic dishes and improved parameters at 72 h exposure among the modes of action assessed. Thus, survey of populations against cyantraniliprole and spinetoram using Bioassay tray arenas showed to be consistent and data suggested resistance evidence in L. sativae populations. Resistance ratio varied from 1.2- (MSR4) to 4.2- (BRN1) and from 1.6- (MSR5) to 7.9-fold (MSR2) for cyantraniliprole and spinetoram, respectively. Diagnostic concentration (10 mg/L) for both insecticides showed survival up to 10% (spinetoram) and 2% (cyantraniliprole). The bioassay tray method may be an alternative to existing methods for toxicological assessments and detection/documenting resistance to insecticides.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Phytoparasitica
Phytoparasitica 生物-植物科学
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Phytoparasitica is an international journal on Plant Protection, that publishes original research contributions on the biological, chemical and molecular aspects of Entomology, Plant Pathology, Virology, Nematology, and Weed Sciences, which strives to improve scientific knowledge and technology for IPM, in forest and agroecosystems. Phytoparasitica emphasizes new insights into plant disease and pest etiology, epidemiology, host-parasite/pest biochemistry and cell biology, ecology and population biology, host genetics and resistance, disease vector biology, plant stress and biotic disorders, postharvest pathology and mycotoxins. Research can cover aspects related to the nature of plant diseases, pests and weeds, the causal agents, their spread, the losses they cause, crop loss assessment, and novel tactics and approaches for their management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信