Florence E. Turrentine, Charles M. Friel, Anneke T. Schroen
{"title":"普外科住院医师申请者简历和推荐信中领导力文件的一致性","authors":"Florence E. Turrentine, Charles M. Friel, Anneke T. Schroen","doi":"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Letters of recommendation (LOR) are vital to surgical residency applications. Our prior study demonstrated differences in letter content by applicant sex, including more frequent reference to leadership and awards for male applicants. This study evaluates if leadership activities and awards as documented by the applicant's curriculum vitae (CV) corroborate differences noted in corresponding recommendation letters. LORs and CVs for 2016–2017 surgery resident applicants selected for interview at single academic institution were analyzed for documentation of leadership and awards and assessed for concordance. 89 applicant CVs (45 male, 44 female) and 332 LORs (165 male, 167 female) were reviewed for evidence of leadership and awards. While 94 % of CVs had evidence of leadership, leadership was referenced in LORs more often for men than women (45 % vs 30 %, p = 0.004). References to leadership skills (38 % vs 21 %, p=<0.001), elected/appointed office (33 % vs 16 %, p < 0.001), and volunteer/work-related leadership role (12 % vs 3 %, p = 0.001) occurred more commonly for men. Similarly, awards were present in 74 % of CVs without difference by sex but referenced more commonly for men compared to women (64 % vs 46 %, p = 0.001). References to leadership and awards in LORs were more common for men than women applicants, which is not reflective of CV content. Although LOR need not recapitulate CVs, fair appraisal of leadership abilities is encouraged.","PeriodicalId":501554,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Surgery","volume":"193 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concordance of leadership documentation in curricula vitae and recommendation letters among applicants for general surgery residency\",\"authors\":\"Florence E. Turrentine, Charles M. Friel, Anneke T. Schroen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115956\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Letters of recommendation (LOR) are vital to surgical residency applications. Our prior study demonstrated differences in letter content by applicant sex, including more frequent reference to leadership and awards for male applicants. This study evaluates if leadership activities and awards as documented by the applicant's curriculum vitae (CV) corroborate differences noted in corresponding recommendation letters. LORs and CVs for 2016–2017 surgery resident applicants selected for interview at single academic institution were analyzed for documentation of leadership and awards and assessed for concordance. 89 applicant CVs (45 male, 44 female) and 332 LORs (165 male, 167 female) were reviewed for evidence of leadership and awards. While 94 % of CVs had evidence of leadership, leadership was referenced in LORs more often for men than women (45 % vs 30 %, p = 0.004). References to leadership skills (38 % vs 21 %, p=<0.001), elected/appointed office (33 % vs 16 %, p < 0.001), and volunteer/work-related leadership role (12 % vs 3 %, p = 0.001) occurred more commonly for men. Similarly, awards were present in 74 % of CVs without difference by sex but referenced more commonly for men compared to women (64 % vs 46 %, p = 0.001). References to leadership and awards in LORs were more common for men than women applicants, which is not reflective of CV content. Although LOR need not recapitulate CVs, fair appraisal of leadership abilities is encouraged.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The American Journal of Surgery\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The American Journal of Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115956\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2024.115956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
推荐信(LOR)对于外科住院医师培训申请至关重要。我们之前的研究表明,不同性别的申请者在推荐信内容上存在差异,其中男性申请者更常提及领导能力和奖项。本研究评估了申请人简历(CV)中记录的领导活动和奖项是否证实了相应推荐信中的差异。研究人员分析了被选中参加单一学术机构面试的 2016-2017 年外科住院医师申请者的推荐信和简历,以了解其是否记录了领导力和奖项,并评估其一致性。对 89 份申请者简历(45 名男性,44 名女性)和 332 份 LOR(165 名男性,167 名女性)进行了审查,以查找领导力和获奖的证据。虽然 94% 的简历中都有领导能力的证明,但在 LOR 中,男性比女性更常提到领导能力(45% 对 30%,p = 0.004)。男性更常提及领导技能(38 % vs 21 %,p=<0.001)、当选/任命职位(33 % vs 16 %,p<0.001)和志愿者/与工作相关的领导角色(12 % vs 3 %,p=0.001)。同样,在 74% 的简历中都提到了奖项,没有性别差异,但男性比女性更常提到奖项(64% 对 46%,p = 0.001)。男性申请人比女性申请人更常在自荐信中提及领导能力和奖项,这并不反映简历的内容。虽然 LOR 不一定要概括简历内容,但应鼓励对领导能力进行公平评价。
Concordance of leadership documentation in curricula vitae and recommendation letters among applicants for general surgery residency
Letters of recommendation (LOR) are vital to surgical residency applications. Our prior study demonstrated differences in letter content by applicant sex, including more frequent reference to leadership and awards for male applicants. This study evaluates if leadership activities and awards as documented by the applicant's curriculum vitae (CV) corroborate differences noted in corresponding recommendation letters. LORs and CVs for 2016–2017 surgery resident applicants selected for interview at single academic institution were analyzed for documentation of leadership and awards and assessed for concordance. 89 applicant CVs (45 male, 44 female) and 332 LORs (165 male, 167 female) were reviewed for evidence of leadership and awards. While 94 % of CVs had evidence of leadership, leadership was referenced in LORs more often for men than women (45 % vs 30 %, p = 0.004). References to leadership skills (38 % vs 21 %, p=<0.001), elected/appointed office (33 % vs 16 %, p < 0.001), and volunteer/work-related leadership role (12 % vs 3 %, p = 0.001) occurred more commonly for men. Similarly, awards were present in 74 % of CVs without difference by sex but referenced more commonly for men compared to women (64 % vs 46 %, p = 0.001). References to leadership and awards in LORs were more common for men than women applicants, which is not reflective of CV content. Although LOR need not recapitulate CVs, fair appraisal of leadership abilities is encouraged.