欧洲的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 :综述

IF 9 1区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Sarah Rhodes, Sarah Beale, Sarah Daniels, Matthew Gittins, William Mueller, Damien McElvenny, Martie van Tongeren
{"title":"欧洲的职业与 SARS-CoV-2 :综述","authors":"Sarah Rhodes, Sarah Beale, Sarah Daniels, Matthew Gittins, William Mueller, Damien McElvenny, Martie van Tongeren","doi":"10.1183/16000617.0044-2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<sec><st>Introduction</st>\n<p>Workplace features such as ventilation, temperature and the extent of contact are all likely to relate to personal risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Occupations relating to healthcare, social care, education, transport and food production and retail are thought to have increased risks, but the extent to which these risks are elevated and how they have varied over time is unclear.</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Methods</st>\n<p>We searched for population cohort studies conducted in Europe that compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes between two or more different occupational groups. Data were extracted on relative differences between occupational groups, split into four time-periods corresponding to pandemic waves.</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Results</st>\n<p>We included data from 17 studies. 11 studies used SARS-CoV-2 as their outcome measure and six used COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality. During waves one and two, the majority of studies saw elevated risks in the five groups that we looked at. Only seven studies used data from wave three onwards. Elevated risks were observed in waves three and four for social care and education workers in some studies.</p>\n</sec>\n<sec><st>Conclusions</st>\n<p>Evidence relating to occupational differences in COVID-19 outcomes in Europe largely focuses on the early part of the pandemic. There is consistent evidence that the direction and magnitude of differences varied with time. Workers in the healthcare, transport and food production sectors saw highly elevated risks in the early part of the pandemic in the majority of studies but this did not appear to continue. There was evidence that elevated risks of infection in the education and social care sectors may have persisted.</p>\n</sec>","PeriodicalId":12166,"journal":{"name":"European Respiratory Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Rhodes, Sarah Beale, Sarah Daniels, Matthew Gittins, William Mueller, Damien McElvenny, Martie van Tongeren\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/16000617.0044-2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<sec><st>Introduction</st>\\n<p>Workplace features such as ventilation, temperature and the extent of contact are all likely to relate to personal risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Occupations relating to healthcare, social care, education, transport and food production and retail are thought to have increased risks, but the extent to which these risks are elevated and how they have varied over time is unclear.</p>\\n</sec>\\n<sec><st>Methods</st>\\n<p>We searched for population cohort studies conducted in Europe that compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes between two or more different occupational groups. Data were extracted on relative differences between occupational groups, split into four time-periods corresponding to pandemic waves.</p>\\n</sec>\\n<sec><st>Results</st>\\n<p>We included data from 17 studies. 11 studies used SARS-CoV-2 as their outcome measure and six used COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality. During waves one and two, the majority of studies saw elevated risks in the five groups that we looked at. Only seven studies used data from wave three onwards. Elevated risks were observed in waves three and four for social care and education workers in some studies.</p>\\n</sec>\\n<sec><st>Conclusions</st>\\n<p>Evidence relating to occupational differences in COVID-19 outcomes in Europe largely focuses on the early part of the pandemic. There is consistent evidence that the direction and magnitude of differences varied with time. Workers in the healthcare, transport and food production sectors saw highly elevated risks in the early part of the pandemic in the majority of studies but this did not appear to continue. There was evidence that elevated risks of infection in the education and social care sectors may have persisted.</p>\\n</sec>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Respiratory Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0044-2024\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Respiratory Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0044-2024","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:通风、温度和接触程度等工作场所特征都可能与个人感染严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)的风险有关。与医疗保健、社会护理、教育、运输、食品生产和零售有关的职业被认为具有更高的风险,但这些风险的升高程度以及它们随着时间的推移而发生的变化尚不清楚。方法我们搜索了在欧洲进行的人群队列研究,这些研究比较了两个或两个以上不同职业组之间的冠状病毒疾病 2019(COVID-19)结果。结果我们纳入了 17 项研究的数据。其中 11 项研究使用 SARS-CoV-2 作为衡量指标,6 项研究使用 COVID-19 作为衡量住院率和死亡率的指标。在第一波和第二波期间,大多数研究发现我们所研究的五个组别中的风险都有所升高。只有七项研究使用了第三波以后的数据。结论欧洲 COVID-19 结果的职业差异相关证据主要集中在大流行的早期阶段。有一致的证据表明,差异的方向和程度随时间而变化。在大多数研究中,医疗保健、运输和食品生产部门的工人在疫情初期面临的风险较高,但这种情况似乎并未持续。有证据表明,教育和社会保健部门的高感染风险可能持续存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Occupation and SARS-CoV-2 in Europe: a review
Introduction

Workplace features such as ventilation, temperature and the extent of contact are all likely to relate to personal risk of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Occupations relating to healthcare, social care, education, transport and food production and retail are thought to have increased risks, but the extent to which these risks are elevated and how they have varied over time is unclear.

Methods

We searched for population cohort studies conducted in Europe that compared coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outcomes between two or more different occupational groups. Data were extracted on relative differences between occupational groups, split into four time-periods corresponding to pandemic waves.

Results

We included data from 17 studies. 11 studies used SARS-CoV-2 as their outcome measure and six used COVID-19 hospitalisation and mortality. During waves one and two, the majority of studies saw elevated risks in the five groups that we looked at. Only seven studies used data from wave three onwards. Elevated risks were observed in waves three and four for social care and education workers in some studies.

Conclusions

Evidence relating to occupational differences in COVID-19 outcomes in Europe largely focuses on the early part of the pandemic. There is consistent evidence that the direction and magnitude of differences varied with time. Workers in the healthcare, transport and food production sectors saw highly elevated risks in the early part of the pandemic in the majority of studies but this did not appear to continue. There was evidence that elevated risks of infection in the education and social care sectors may have persisted.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Respiratory Review
European Respiratory Review Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
14.40
自引率
1.30%
发文量
91
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Respiratory Review (ERR) is an open-access journal published by the European Respiratory Society (ERS), serving as a vital resource for respiratory professionals by delivering updates on medicine, science, and surgery in the field. ERR features state-of-the-art review articles, editorials, correspondence, and summaries of recent research findings and studies covering a wide range of topics including COPD, asthma, pulmonary hypertension, interstitial lung disease, lung cancer, tuberculosis, and pulmonary infections. Articles are published continuously and compiled into quarterly issues within a single annual volume.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信