雷替曲塞化疗方案加贝伐单抗作为转移性结直肠癌的二线治疗方案:前瞻性多中心 II 期试验

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Sheng Li, Xiaoyou Li, Qianni Zhu, Jin Gao, Chunrong Zhu, Liangjun Zhu
{"title":"雷替曲塞化疗方案加贝伐单抗作为转移性结直肠癌的二线治疗方案:前瞻性多中心 II 期试验","authors":"Sheng Li, Xiaoyou Li, Qianni Zhu, Jin Gao, Chunrong Zhu, Liangjun Zhu","doi":"10.1177/10732748241275012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesClinical studies have shown that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of changing second-line treatment to raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients who have failed the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study. A total of 100 patients with mCRC after failure of the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab were enrolled from November 2016 to October 2021, and received second-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab. Patients were treated for 6 cycles, and efficacy evaluation over stable disease were followed by maintenance treatment of bevacizumab and raltitrexed until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and toxicity.ResultsNinety-four patients were treated with SALIRI (raltitrexed + irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, and six patients with SALOX (raltitrexed + oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab. Median PFS was 8.4 (95% CI: 6.2-11.0) months, including 8.2 (95% CI 6.2, 11.0) months in the SALIRI group and 11.6 (95% CI 3.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. Median OS was 17.6 (95% CI 15.2, 22.0) months in the SALIRI group and 17.1 (95% CI 4.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. ORR and DCR were 25.5% and 87.2% in the SALIRI group, and 33.3% and 83.3% in the SALOX group, respectively. A low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was observed.ConclusionsRaltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab improved survival duration in mCRC patients with failed first-line therapy. Therefore, treatment with raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab could be a superior therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in mCRC ( ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03126071).","PeriodicalId":49093,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Control","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Raltitrexed Chemotherapy Regimen Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial\",\"authors\":\"Sheng Li, Xiaoyou Li, Qianni Zhu, Jin Gao, Chunrong Zhu, Liangjun Zhu\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10732748241275012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ObjectivesClinical studies have shown that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of changing second-line treatment to raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients who have failed the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study. A total of 100 patients with mCRC after failure of the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab were enrolled from November 2016 to October 2021, and received second-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab. Patients were treated for 6 cycles, and efficacy evaluation over stable disease were followed by maintenance treatment of bevacizumab and raltitrexed until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and toxicity.ResultsNinety-four patients were treated with SALIRI (raltitrexed + irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, and six patients with SALOX (raltitrexed + oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab. Median PFS was 8.4 (95% CI: 6.2-11.0) months, including 8.2 (95% CI 6.2, 11.0) months in the SALIRI group and 11.6 (95% CI 3.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. Median OS was 17.6 (95% CI 15.2, 22.0) months in the SALIRI group and 17.1 (95% CI 4.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. ORR and DCR were 25.5% and 87.2% in the SALIRI group, and 33.3% and 83.3% in the SALOX group, respectively. A low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was observed.ConclusionsRaltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab improved survival duration in mCRC patients with failed first-line therapy. Therefore, treatment with raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab could be a superior therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in mCRC ( ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03126071).\",\"PeriodicalId\":49093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Control\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Control\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241275012\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Control","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10732748241275012","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的临床研究表明,贝伐单抗联合化疗可显著提高转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)的疗效。这项前瞻性研究旨在探讨在一线氟尿嘧啶为基础的化疗方案联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗/西妥昔单抗治疗失败的mCRC患者中,将二线治疗改为以拉替曲塞为基础的化疗方案联合贝伐珠单抗治疗的有效性和安全性。2016年11月至2021年10月,共有100名一线氟尿嘧啶为基础的化疗方案联合或不联合贝伐珠单抗/西妥昔单抗治疗失败的mCRC患者入组,接受二线雷替曲塞为基础的化疗方案联合贝伐珠单抗治疗。患者接受6个周期的治疗,疗效评估超过疾病稳定后,贝伐珠单抗和雷替曲塞维持治疗,直至疾病进展或出现不可耐受的毒性反应。主要终点是无进展生存期(PFS)。次要终点包括总生存期(OS)、客观反应率(ORR)、疾病控制率(DCR)、安全性和毒性。结果94名患者接受了SALIRI(拉替曲塞+伊立替康)加贝伐珠单抗治疗,6名患者接受了SALOX(拉替曲塞+奥沙利铂)加贝伐珠单抗治疗。中位 PFS 为 8.4 个月(95% CI:6.2-11.0),其中 SALIRI 组为 8.2 个月(95% CI:6.2-11.0),SALOX 组为 11.6 个月(95% CI:3.1-NA)。SALIRI组的中位OS为17.6(95% CI 15.2,22.0)个月,SALOX组为17.1(95% CI 4.1,NA)个月。SALIRI组的ORR和DCR分别为25.5%和87.2%,SALOX组分别为33.3%和83.3%。结论 以雷替曲塞为基础的化疗方案加贝伐单抗可改善一线治疗失败的mCRC患者的生存期。因此,以雷替曲塞为基础的化疗方案加贝伐单抗可能是mCRC二线化疗的一个更优治疗选择(ClinicalTrials.gov注册号:NCT03126071)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Raltitrexed Chemotherapy Regimen Plus Bevacizumab as Second-Line Treatment for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Trial
ObjectivesClinical studies have shown that bevacizumab plus chemotherapy significantly improves efficacy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). This prospective study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of changing second-line treatment to raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab in mCRC patients who have failed the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab.MethodsThis is a prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase II clinical study. A total of 100 patients with mCRC after failure of the first-line fluorouracil-based chemotherapy regimen with or without bevacizumab/cetuximab were enrolled from November 2016 to October 2021, and received second-line raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimen plus bevacizumab. Patients were treated for 6 cycles, and efficacy evaluation over stable disease were followed by maintenance treatment of bevacizumab and raltitrexed until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), safety, and toxicity.ResultsNinety-four patients were treated with SALIRI (raltitrexed + irinotecan) plus bevacizumab, and six patients with SALOX (raltitrexed + oxaliplatin) plus bevacizumab. Median PFS was 8.4 (95% CI: 6.2-11.0) months, including 8.2 (95% CI 6.2, 11.0) months in the SALIRI group and 11.6 (95% CI 3.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. Median OS was 17.6 (95% CI 15.2, 22.0) months in the SALIRI group and 17.1 (95% CI 4.1, NA) months in the SALOX group. ORR and DCR were 25.5% and 87.2% in the SALIRI group, and 33.3% and 83.3% in the SALOX group, respectively. A low incidence of grade 3-4 adverse events was observed.ConclusionsRaltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab improved survival duration in mCRC patients with failed first-line therapy. Therefore, treatment with raltitrexed-based chemotherapy regimens plus bevacizumab could be a superior therapeutic option for second-line chemotherapy in mCRC ( ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03126071).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Control
Cancer Control ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
148
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Control is a JCR-ranked, peer-reviewed open access journal whose mission is to advance the prevention, detection, diagnosis, treatment, and palliative care of cancer by enabling researchers, doctors, policymakers, and other healthcare professionals to freely share research along the cancer control continuum. Our vision is a world where gold-standard cancer care is the norm, not the exception.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信