在物理多媒体交流课程中反思学习

Steven W. Tarr, Emily Alicea-Muñoz
{"title":"在物理多媒体交流课程中反思学习","authors":"Steven W. Tarr, Emily Alicea-Muñoz","doi":"arxiv-2409.09145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science communication skills are considered essential learning objectives for\nundergraduate physics students. However, high enrollment and limited class\nresources present significant barriers to providing students ample\nopportunities to practice their formal presentation skills. We investigate the\nuse of integrated critical reflection and peer evaluation activities in a\nphysics senior seminar course both to improve student learning outcomes and to\nsupplement highly restricted presentation time. Throughout the semester, each\nstudent delivers one 8-min multimedia presentation on either their research or\nan upper-division course topic. Following each presentation, audience members\ncomplete one of two randomly assigned peer evaluations: a treatment form that\nprompts critical reflection or a control form that does not. Each class period\nconcludes with a short quiz on concepts presented in that day's presentations.\nWe observe minimal differences in quiz scores between students in the control\nand treatment groups. Instead, we find that retention and transfer of\npresentation content correlate with certain metrics of presentation quality\ndescribed in the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and with\nself-identified prior exposure to presentation topics.","PeriodicalId":501565,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reflecting to learn in a physics multimedia communication course\",\"authors\":\"Steven W. Tarr, Emily Alicea-Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.09145\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Science communication skills are considered essential learning objectives for\\nundergraduate physics students. However, high enrollment and limited class\\nresources present significant barriers to providing students ample\\nopportunities to practice their formal presentation skills. We investigate the\\nuse of integrated critical reflection and peer evaluation activities in a\\nphysics senior seminar course both to improve student learning outcomes and to\\nsupplement highly restricted presentation time. Throughout the semester, each\\nstudent delivers one 8-min multimedia presentation on either their research or\\nan upper-division course topic. Following each presentation, audience members\\ncomplete one of two randomly assigned peer evaluations: a treatment form that\\nprompts critical reflection or a control form that does not. Each class period\\nconcludes with a short quiz on concepts presented in that day's presentations.\\nWe observe minimal differences in quiz scores between students in the control\\nand treatment groups. Instead, we find that retention and transfer of\\npresentation content correlate with certain metrics of presentation quality\\ndescribed in the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and with\\nself-identified prior exposure to presentation topics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09145\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - Physics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.09145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

科学交流技能被认为是物理学本科生的基本学习目标。然而,高入学率和有限的课堂资源是为学生提供充分机会练习正式演讲技能的重大障碍。我们研究了在物理高级研讨课程中使用综合批判性反思和同行评价活动的问题,既能提高学生的学习效果,又能补充非常有限的演讲时间。在整个学期中,每个学生都要做一次 8 分钟的多媒体演示,内容可以是他们的研究,也可以是高年级的课程主题。每次演讲结束后,听众从随机分配的两份同伴评价表中选择一份填写:一份是鼓励批判性反思的处理表,另一份是不鼓励批判性反思的对照表。我们观察到,对照组和处理组学生的测验成绩差异很小。相反,我们发现,演示内容的保留和迁移与多媒体学习认知理论中描述的演示质量的某些指标以及自我认同的先前对演示主题的接触相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reflecting to learn in a physics multimedia communication course
Science communication skills are considered essential learning objectives for undergraduate physics students. However, high enrollment and limited class resources present significant barriers to providing students ample opportunities to practice their formal presentation skills. We investigate the use of integrated critical reflection and peer evaluation activities in a physics senior seminar course both to improve student learning outcomes and to supplement highly restricted presentation time. Throughout the semester, each student delivers one 8-min multimedia presentation on either their research or an upper-division course topic. Following each presentation, audience members complete one of two randomly assigned peer evaluations: a treatment form that prompts critical reflection or a control form that does not. Each class period concludes with a short quiz on concepts presented in that day's presentations. We observe minimal differences in quiz scores between students in the control and treatment groups. Instead, we find that retention and transfer of presentation content correlate with certain metrics of presentation quality described in the Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning and with self-identified prior exposure to presentation topics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信