核磁共振成像诊断性能和策略,用于识别经治疗的小儿盘状和非盘状外侧半月板修复术中的再撕裂情况

Jason Zarahi Amaral, Rida Salman, Scott D. McKay, J. Herman Kan
{"title":"核磁共振成像诊断性能和策略,用于识别经治疗的小儿盘状和非盘状外侧半月板修复术中的再撕裂情况","authors":"Jason Zarahi Amaral, Rida Salman, Scott D. McKay, J. Herman Kan","doi":"10.1007/s11547-024-01884-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a role in assessing retears of previously treated lateral menisci (LM). We aim to characterize the rate and pattern of arthroscopically confirmed LM retears in children with and without discoid morphology. 288 patients (312 knees) who underwent arthroscopic repair of isolated LM tears between 2018 and 2023 were identified. 20 patients (21 knees) had arthroscopically confirmed isolated LM retear. This included 11 retears of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and 10 retears of non-DLM. MRI correctly identified retear in 81.8% of DLM cases (n = 9) and 100% of non-DLM cases (overall 90.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.476). 78% of DLM cases (n = 7) had residual discoid elements. MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing retears in isolated LM injuries (90.5%). We suggest that the radiological approach to assessing meniscal retears can be similarly applied to treated discoid and non-discoid menisci. However, special attention to residual discoid elements is crucial in previously treated DLMs.</p>","PeriodicalId":501689,"journal":{"name":"La radiologia medica","volume":"116 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"MRI diagnostic performance and strategies for identifying retears in treated pediatric discoid and non-discoid lateral meniscal repairs\",\"authors\":\"Jason Zarahi Amaral, Rida Salman, Scott D. McKay, J. Herman Kan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11547-024-01884-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a role in assessing retears of previously treated lateral menisci (LM). We aim to characterize the rate and pattern of arthroscopically confirmed LM retears in children with and without discoid morphology. 288 patients (312 knees) who underwent arthroscopic repair of isolated LM tears between 2018 and 2023 were identified. 20 patients (21 knees) had arthroscopically confirmed isolated LM retear. This included 11 retears of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and 10 retears of non-DLM. MRI correctly identified retear in 81.8% of DLM cases (n = 9) and 100% of non-DLM cases (overall 90.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.476). 78% of DLM cases (n = 7) had residual discoid elements. MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing retears in isolated LM injuries (90.5%). We suggest that the radiological approach to assessing meniscal retears can be similarly applied to treated discoid and non-discoid menisci. However, special attention to residual discoid elements is crucial in previously treated DLMs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":501689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"La radiologia medica\",\"volume\":\"116 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"La radiologia medica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01884-x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"La radiologia medica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11547-024-01884-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

磁共振成像(MRI)在评估先前治疗过的外侧半月板(LM)的再撕裂情况中发挥着作用。我们的目的是描述有盘状形态和无盘状形态的儿童中经关节镜证实的LM再撕裂率和模式。我们对2018年至2023年期间接受关节镜修复孤立LM撕裂的288名患者(312个膝关节)进行了鉴定。20名患者(21个膝关节)经关节镜确诊为孤立LM再撕裂。其中包括11例盘状外侧半月板(DLM)再撕裂和10例非DLM再撕裂。磁共振成像正确识别出81.8%的DLM病例(n = 9)和100%的非DLM病例(总体90.5%,P = 0.476)存在再撕裂。78%的 DLM 病例(7 例)有残留的盘状元素。磁共振成像在诊断孤立的 LM 损伤(90.5%)时非常准确。我们认为,评估半月板再撕裂的放射学方法同样适用于经过治疗的盘状和非盘状半月板。然而,在先前治疗过的DLM中,特别注意残留的盘状元素至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

MRI diagnostic performance and strategies for identifying retears in treated pediatric discoid and non-discoid lateral meniscal repairs

MRI diagnostic performance and strategies for identifying retears in treated pediatric discoid and non-discoid lateral meniscal repairs

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays a role in assessing retears of previously treated lateral menisci (LM). We aim to characterize the rate and pattern of arthroscopically confirmed LM retears in children with and without discoid morphology. 288 patients (312 knees) who underwent arthroscopic repair of isolated LM tears between 2018 and 2023 were identified. 20 patients (21 knees) had arthroscopically confirmed isolated LM retear. This included 11 retears of discoid lateral meniscus (DLM) and 10 retears of non-DLM. MRI correctly identified retear in 81.8% of DLM cases (n = 9) and 100% of non-DLM cases (overall 90.5%, P = 0.476). 78% of DLM cases (n = 7) had residual discoid elements. MRI is highly accurate in diagnosing retears in isolated LM injuries (90.5%). We suggest that the radiological approach to assessing meniscal retears can be similarly applied to treated discoid and non-discoid menisci. However, special attention to residual discoid elements is crucial in previously treated DLMs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信