接受治疗和继续接受艾滋病毒治疗的时间:美国南部医疗补助参保者的城乡差异

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
April D. Kimmel PhD, Rose S. Bono MPH, Zhongzhe Pan PhD, Jessica S. Kiernan MSc, Faye Z. Belgrave PhD, Daniel E. Nixon DO, Lindsay Sabik PhD, Bassam Dahman PhD
{"title":"接受治疗和继续接受艾滋病毒治疗的时间:美国南部医疗补助参保者的城乡差异","authors":"April D. Kimmel PhD,&nbsp;Rose S. Bono MPH,&nbsp;Zhongzhe Pan PhD,&nbsp;Jessica S. Kiernan MSc,&nbsp;Faye Z. Belgrave PhD,&nbsp;Daniel E. Nixon DO,&nbsp;Lindsay Sabik PhD,&nbsp;Bassam Dahman PhD","doi":"10.1111/jrh.12877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>Less than 50% of people with HIV (PWH) in the United States are retained in care, a key step along the HIV care continuum. We examined the impact of geographic access to care on retention in care for urban and rural PWH.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We used Medicaid claims and clinician data (Medicaid Analytic eXtract and MAX Provider Characteristics, 2009–2012) for 13 Southern states plus the District of Columbia. We calculated drive time from the enrollees’ ZIP Code Tabulation Area to their usual source of care. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the association between drive time to care &gt;30 min (versus ≤30 min) and retention in care, overall and stratified by rurality. In sensitivity analysis, we examined the definition of retention in care, states included in the analysis, and enrollee- and care-related characteristics.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The sample included 49,596 PWH. Overall, the association between drive time &gt;30 min and retention was significant, but small (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.01) and was not significant in urban areas; however, the significance and direction of the association differed in sensitivity analysis. In rural areas, driving &gt;30 min to care was associated with 7% higher odds of retention in care (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.08) and this association remained significant and positive in nearly all sensitivity analyses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>For PWH in rural areas, greater drive time is consistently associated with greater retention in care. Disentangling the mechanisms of this relationship is a future research priority.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50060,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Health","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12877","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drive time to care and retention in HIV care: Rural–urban differences among Medicaid enrollees in the United States South\",\"authors\":\"April D. Kimmel PhD,&nbsp;Rose S. Bono MPH,&nbsp;Zhongzhe Pan PhD,&nbsp;Jessica S. Kiernan MSc,&nbsp;Faye Z. Belgrave PhD,&nbsp;Daniel E. Nixon DO,&nbsp;Lindsay Sabik PhD,&nbsp;Bassam Dahman PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jrh.12877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>Less than 50% of people with HIV (PWH) in the United States are retained in care, a key step along the HIV care continuum. We examined the impact of geographic access to care on retention in care for urban and rural PWH.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used Medicaid claims and clinician data (Medicaid Analytic eXtract and MAX Provider Characteristics, 2009–2012) for 13 Southern states plus the District of Columbia. We calculated drive time from the enrollees’ ZIP Code Tabulation Area to their usual source of care. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the association between drive time to care &gt;30 min (versus ≤30 min) and retention in care, overall and stratified by rurality. In sensitivity analysis, we examined the definition of retention in care, states included in the analysis, and enrollee- and care-related characteristics.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The sample included 49,596 PWH. Overall, the association between drive time &gt;30 min and retention was significant, but small (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.01) and was not significant in urban areas; however, the significance and direction of the association differed in sensitivity analysis. In rural areas, driving &gt;30 min to care was associated with 7% higher odds of retention in care (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.08) and this association remained significant and positive in nearly all sensitivity analyses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>For PWH in rural areas, greater drive time is consistently associated with greater retention in care. Disentangling the mechanisms of this relationship is a future research priority.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50060,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jrh.12877\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12877\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jrh.12877","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在美国,只有不到 50% 的艾滋病病毒感染者(PWH)能够继续接受治疗,而这是艾滋病治疗过程中的关键一步。我们使用了美国南部 13 个州和哥伦比亚特区的医疗补助(Medicaid)报销和临床医生数据(Medicaid Analytic eXtract 和 MAX Provider Characteristics,2009-2012 年)。我们计算了从参保者的邮政编码表区到其常用医疗机构的车程。我们使用了广义估计方程来检验从驾车到就医时间为 30 分钟(相对于≤30 分钟)与就医率之间的关系,包括总体关系和按农村地区分层的关系。在敏感性分析中,我们研究了继续接受护理的定义、纳入分析的州以及参保者和护理相关特征。总体而言,驾驶时间 30 分钟与保留率之间的关系显著但较小(调整后的几率比 [aOR] 1.01,95% 置信区间 [CI] 1.00,1.01),在城市地区并不显著;然而,在敏感性分析中,两者关系的显著性和方向有所不同。在农村地区,驾车 30 分钟到达护理机构与 7% 的继续接受护理的几率相关(aOR 1.07,95% CI 1.05,1.08),在几乎所有的敏感性分析中,这种关联仍然显著且呈正相关。结论对于农村地区的威利恩病患者来说,开车时间越长,就诊率越高,而厘清这种关系的机制是未来研究的重点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Drive time to care and retention in HIV care: Rural–urban differences among Medicaid enrollees in the United States South

Drive time to care and retention in HIV care: Rural–urban differences among Medicaid enrollees in the United States South

Purpose

Less than 50% of people with HIV (PWH) in the United States are retained in care, a key step along the HIV care continuum. We examined the impact of geographic access to care on retention in care for urban and rural PWH.

Methods

We used Medicaid claims and clinician data (Medicaid Analytic eXtract and MAX Provider Characteristics, 2009–2012) for 13 Southern states plus the District of Columbia. We calculated drive time from the enrollees’ ZIP Code Tabulation Area to their usual source of care. We used generalized estimating equations to examine the association between drive time to care >30 min (versus ≤30 min) and retention in care, overall and stratified by rurality. In sensitivity analysis, we examined the definition of retention in care, states included in the analysis, and enrollee- and care-related characteristics.

Findings

The sample included 49,596 PWH. Overall, the association between drive time >30 min and retention was significant, but small (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.01) and was not significant in urban areas; however, the significance and direction of the association differed in sensitivity analysis. In rural areas, driving >30 min to care was associated with 7% higher odds of retention in care (aOR 1.07, 95% CI 1.05, 1.08) and this association remained significant and positive in nearly all sensitivity analyses.

Conclusions

For PWH in rural areas, greater drive time is consistently associated with greater retention in care. Disentangling the mechanisms of this relationship is a future research priority.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Rural Health
Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.10%
发文量
86
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Health, a quarterly journal published by the NRHA, offers a variety of original research relevant and important to rural health. Some examples include evaluations, case studies, and analyses related to health status and behavior, as well as to health work force, policy and access issues. Quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies are welcome. Highest priority is given to manuscripts that reflect scholarly quality, demonstrate methodological rigor, and emphasize practical implications. The journal also publishes articles with an international rural health perspective, commentaries, book reviews and letters.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信