语义悖论的量子诠释:语境与叠加

IF 0.6 3区 数学 Q2 LOGIC
Heng Zhou, Yongjun Wang, Baoshan Wang, Jian Yan
{"title":"语义悖论的量子诠释:语境与叠加","authors":"Heng Zhou, Yongjun Wang, Baoshan Wang, Jian Yan","doi":"10.1007/s11225-024-10150-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We employ topos quantum theory as a mathematical framework for quantum logic, combining the strengths of two distinct intuitionistic quantum logics proposed by Döring and Coecke respectively. This results in a novel intuitionistic quantum logic that can capture contextuality, express the physical meaning of superposition phenomenon in quantum systems, and handle both measurement and evolution as dynamic operations. We emphasize that superposition is a relative concept dependent on contextuality. Our intention is to find a model from the perspective of quantum theory that accommodates semantic paradoxes. We refine Aerts et al.’s interpretation of the liar paradox using models from quantum mechanics and present a model based on quantum theory, incorporating contextuality and superposition to interpret semantic paradoxes. We associate the truth values of statements in semantic paradoxes with quantum states in a given context, interpreting statements with unclear truth value assignments as superposition states within the current context. Dynamic operations are employed to distinguish the truth value assignments of statements among different times. Unlike the classic interpretation of paradoxes, we accept the reasonable existence of semantic paradoxes and point out the difference between paradoxes and contradictions.</p>","PeriodicalId":48979,"journal":{"name":"Studia Logica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantum Interpretation of Semantic Paradox: Contextuality and Superposition\",\"authors\":\"Heng Zhou, Yongjun Wang, Baoshan Wang, Jian Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11225-024-10150-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>We employ topos quantum theory as a mathematical framework for quantum logic, combining the strengths of two distinct intuitionistic quantum logics proposed by Döring and Coecke respectively. This results in a novel intuitionistic quantum logic that can capture contextuality, express the physical meaning of superposition phenomenon in quantum systems, and handle both measurement and evolution as dynamic operations. We emphasize that superposition is a relative concept dependent on contextuality. Our intention is to find a model from the perspective of quantum theory that accommodates semantic paradoxes. We refine Aerts et al.’s interpretation of the liar paradox using models from quantum mechanics and present a model based on quantum theory, incorporating contextuality and superposition to interpret semantic paradoxes. We associate the truth values of statements in semantic paradoxes with quantum states in a given context, interpreting statements with unclear truth value assignments as superposition states within the current context. Dynamic operations are employed to distinguish the truth value assignments of statements among different times. Unlike the classic interpretation of paradoxes, we accept the reasonable existence of semantic paradoxes and point out the difference between paradoxes and contradictions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48979,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Logica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Logica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-024-10150-0\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LOGIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Logica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11225-024-10150-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LOGIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们采用拓扑量子理论作为量子逻辑的数学框架,结合了多林(Döring)和科克(Coecke)分别提出的两种不同的直观量子逻辑的优势。这就产生了一种新颖的直观量子逻辑,它可以捕捉上下文,表达量子系统中叠加现象的物理意义,并将测量和演化作为动态操作来处理。我们强调,叠加是一个依赖于上下文的相对概念。我们的目的是从量子理论的角度找到一个能容纳语义悖论的模型。我们利用量子力学模型完善了 Aerts 等人对说谎者悖论的解释,并提出了一个基于量子理论的模型,结合语境和叠加来解释语义悖论。我们将语义悖论中语句的真值与给定上下文中的量子态联系起来,将真值分配不明确的语句解释为当前上下文中的叠加态。我们采用动态运算来区分不同时间的语句真值赋值。与对悖论的经典解释不同,我们接受语义悖论的合理存在,并指出了悖论与矛盾的区别。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantum Interpretation of Semantic Paradox: Contextuality and Superposition

We employ topos quantum theory as a mathematical framework for quantum logic, combining the strengths of two distinct intuitionistic quantum logics proposed by Döring and Coecke respectively. This results in a novel intuitionistic quantum logic that can capture contextuality, express the physical meaning of superposition phenomenon in quantum systems, and handle both measurement and evolution as dynamic operations. We emphasize that superposition is a relative concept dependent on contextuality. Our intention is to find a model from the perspective of quantum theory that accommodates semantic paradoxes. We refine Aerts et al.’s interpretation of the liar paradox using models from quantum mechanics and present a model based on quantum theory, incorporating contextuality and superposition to interpret semantic paradoxes. We associate the truth values of statements in semantic paradoxes with quantum states in a given context, interpreting statements with unclear truth value assignments as superposition states within the current context. Dynamic operations are employed to distinguish the truth value assignments of statements among different times. Unlike the classic interpretation of paradoxes, we accept the reasonable existence of semantic paradoxes and point out the difference between paradoxes and contradictions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Logica
Studia Logica MATHEMATICS-LOGIC
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
14.30%
发文量
43
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The leading idea of Lvov-Warsaw School of Logic, Philosophy and Mathematics was to investigate philosophical problems by means of rigorous methods of mathematics. Evidence of the great success the School experienced is the fact that it has become generally recognized as Polish Style Logic. Today Polish Style Logic is no longer exclusively a Polish speciality. It is represented by numerous logicians, mathematicians and philosophers from research centers all over the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信