{"title":"基于癌症驱动基因的肺腺癌预后风险标记的构建及其临床意义","authors":"Yazhou Su, Tingting Huo, Yanan Wang, Jingyan Li","doi":"10.1007/s12094-024-03703-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Cancer driver genes (CDGs) have been reported as key factors influencing the progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the role of CDGs in LUAD prognosis has not been fully elucidated.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>LUAD transcriptome data and CDG-related data were obtained from public databases and literature. Differentially expressed CDGs (DE-CDGs) greatly associated with LUAD survival (<i>P</i> < 0.05) were identified to establish a prognostic model. In addition, immune analysis of high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups was conducted by utilizing the CIBERSORT and single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithms to assess immune differences. Subsequently, mutation analysis was conducted using <i>maftools</i>. Finally, candidate drugs were identified using the CellMiner database.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>40 DE-CDGs significantly associated with LUAD survival and 11 DE-CDGs associated with prognosis were identified through screening. Regression analysis revealed that risk score can independently predict LUAD prognosis (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Immune landscape analysis revealed that compared to the HR group, the LR group had higher immune scores and high infiltration of various immune cells such as follicular helper B cells and T cells. Mutation landscape analysis demonstrated that missense mutation was the most common mutation type in both risk groups. Drug prediction analysis revealed strong correlations of fulvestrant, S-63845, sapacitabine, lomustine, BLU-667, SR16157, motesanib, AZD-9496, XK-469, dimethylfasudil, P-529, and imatinib with the model genes, suggesting their potential as candidate drugs targeting the model genes.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study identified 11 effective biomarkers, DE-CDGs, which can predict LUAD prognosis and explored the biological significance of CDGs in LUAD prognosis, immunotherapy, and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":10166,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Construction and clinical significance of prognostic risk markers based on cancer driver genes in lung adenocarcinoma\",\"authors\":\"Yazhou Su, Tingting Huo, Yanan Wang, Jingyan Li\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12094-024-03703-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Background</h3><p>Cancer driver genes (CDGs) have been reported as key factors influencing the progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the role of CDGs in LUAD prognosis has not been fully elucidated.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Methods</h3><p>LUAD transcriptome data and CDG-related data were obtained from public databases and literature. Differentially expressed CDGs (DE-CDGs) greatly associated with LUAD survival (<i>P</i> < 0.05) were identified to establish a prognostic model. In addition, immune analysis of high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups was conducted by utilizing the CIBERSORT and single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithms to assess immune differences. Subsequently, mutation analysis was conducted using <i>maftools</i>. Finally, candidate drugs were identified using the CellMiner database.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Results</h3><p>40 DE-CDGs significantly associated with LUAD survival and 11 DE-CDGs associated with prognosis were identified through screening. Regression analysis revealed that risk score can independently predict LUAD prognosis (<i>P</i> < 0.05). Immune landscape analysis revealed that compared to the HR group, the LR group had higher immune scores and high infiltration of various immune cells such as follicular helper B cells and T cells. Mutation landscape analysis demonstrated that missense mutation was the most common mutation type in both risk groups. Drug prediction analysis revealed strong correlations of fulvestrant, S-63845, sapacitabine, lomustine, BLU-667, SR16157, motesanib, AZD-9496, XK-469, dimethylfasudil, P-529, and imatinib with the model genes, suggesting their potential as candidate drugs targeting the model genes.</p><h3 data-test=\\\"abstract-sub-heading\\\">Conclusion</h3><p>This study identified 11 effective biomarkers, DE-CDGs, which can predict LUAD prognosis and explored the biological significance of CDGs in LUAD prognosis, immunotherapy, and treatment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10166,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Translational Oncology\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Translational Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03703-1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Translational Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-024-03703-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Construction and clinical significance of prognostic risk markers based on cancer driver genes in lung adenocarcinoma
Background
Cancer driver genes (CDGs) have been reported as key factors influencing the progression of lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, the role of CDGs in LUAD prognosis has not been fully elucidated.
Methods
LUAD transcriptome data and CDG-related data were obtained from public databases and literature. Differentially expressed CDGs (DE-CDGs) greatly associated with LUAD survival (P < 0.05) were identified to establish a prognostic model. In addition, immune analysis of high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups was conducted by utilizing the CIBERSORT and single sample gene set enrichment analysis (ssGSEA) algorithms to assess immune differences. Subsequently, mutation analysis was conducted using maftools. Finally, candidate drugs were identified using the CellMiner database.
Results
40 DE-CDGs significantly associated with LUAD survival and 11 DE-CDGs associated with prognosis were identified through screening. Regression analysis revealed that risk score can independently predict LUAD prognosis (P < 0.05). Immune landscape analysis revealed that compared to the HR group, the LR group had higher immune scores and high infiltration of various immune cells such as follicular helper B cells and T cells. Mutation landscape analysis demonstrated that missense mutation was the most common mutation type in both risk groups. Drug prediction analysis revealed strong correlations of fulvestrant, S-63845, sapacitabine, lomustine, BLU-667, SR16157, motesanib, AZD-9496, XK-469, dimethylfasudil, P-529, and imatinib with the model genes, suggesting their potential as candidate drugs targeting the model genes.
Conclusion
This study identified 11 effective biomarkers, DE-CDGs, which can predict LUAD prognosis and explored the biological significance of CDGs in LUAD prognosis, immunotherapy, and treatment.