探索多种药物治疗中的药物自我管理:对患者和医疗服务提供者观点的定性系统回顾

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ran Jin, Caiyan Liu, Jinghao Chen, Mengjiao Cui, Bo Xu, Ping Yuan, Lu Chen
{"title":"探索多种药物治疗中的药物自我管理:对患者和医疗服务提供者观点的定性系统回顾","authors":"Ran Jin, Caiyan Liu, Jinghao Chen, Mengjiao Cui, Bo Xu, Ping Yuan, Lu Chen","doi":"10.3389/fphar.2024.1426777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Polypharmacy presents many challenges to patient medication self-management. This study aims to explore the self-management processes of medication in polypharmacy from the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers, which can help identify barriers and facilitators to effective management.Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies was performed by searching seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE, from their establishment until August 2024. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was employed to evaluate the quality of the studies included. The extracted data were then analysed thematically and integrated into The Taxonomy of Everyday Self-management Strategies (TEDSS) framework.Results: A total of 16 studies were included, involving 403 patients and 119 healthcare providers. Patient management measures were mapped into TEDSS framework, including categories such as medical management, support-oriented domains and emotional and role management.Conclusion: Enhancing patients’ proactive health awareness, improving medication literacy, balancing lifestyle adjustments with medication therapy, dynamically reviewing and optimizing medications, strengthening patients’ social support networks, and helping patients integrate medication management into their daily life are the key elements that can effectively assist patients in self-managing their medications. Future interventions to improve patient medication self-management ability should be designed for these issues.Systematic Review Registration:<jats:ext-link>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/</jats:ext-link>, identifier CRD42024524742.","PeriodicalId":12491,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring medication self-management in polypharmacy: a qualitative systematic review of patients and healthcare providers perspectives\",\"authors\":\"Ran Jin, Caiyan Liu, Jinghao Chen, Mengjiao Cui, Bo Xu, Ping Yuan, Lu Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fphar.2024.1426777\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose: Polypharmacy presents many challenges to patient medication self-management. This study aims to explore the self-management processes of medication in polypharmacy from the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers, which can help identify barriers and facilitators to effective management.Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies was performed by searching seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE, from their establishment until August 2024. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was employed to evaluate the quality of the studies included. The extracted data were then analysed thematically and integrated into The Taxonomy of Everyday Self-management Strategies (TEDSS) framework.Results: A total of 16 studies were included, involving 403 patients and 119 healthcare providers. Patient management measures were mapped into TEDSS framework, including categories such as medical management, support-oriented domains and emotional and role management.Conclusion: Enhancing patients’ proactive health awareness, improving medication literacy, balancing lifestyle adjustments with medication therapy, dynamically reviewing and optimizing medications, strengthening patients’ social support networks, and helping patients integrate medication management into their daily life are the key elements that can effectively assist patients in self-managing their medications. Future interventions to improve patient medication self-management ability should be designed for these issues.Systematic Review Registration:<jats:ext-link>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/</jats:ext-link>, identifier CRD42024524742.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12491,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Pharmacology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1426777\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2024.1426777","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:多重用药给患者的用药自我管理带来了许多挑战。本研究旨在从患者和医疗服务提供者的角度探讨多重用药中的药物自我管理过程,这有助于找出有效管理的障碍和促进因素:方法:通过检索七个数据库,对定性研究进行了系统回顾:方法:通过检索 PubMed、Web of Science、Cochrane Library、Embase、CINAHL、PsycINFO 和 MEDLINE 七个数据库,对定性研究进行了系统综述。采用批判性评估技能计划(CASP)工具来评估所收录研究的质量。然后对提取的数据进行专题分析,并将其纳入日常自我管理策略分类学(TEDSS)框架:结果:共纳入 16 项研究,涉及 403 名患者和 119 名医疗服务提供者。结果:共纳入 16 项研究,涉及 403 名患者和 119 名医护人员。患者管理措施被映射到 TEDSS 框架中,包括医疗管理、以支持为导向的领域以及情绪和角色管理等类别:结论:增强患者的主动健康意识、提高药物知识水平、平衡生活方式调整与药物治疗、动态审查和优化药物、加强患者的社会支持网络以及帮助患者将药物管理融入日常生活是有效帮助患者自我管理药物的关键因素。未来提高患者药物自我管理能力的干预措施应针对这些问题进行设计。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42024524742。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring medication self-management in polypharmacy: a qualitative systematic review of patients and healthcare providers perspectives
Purpose: Polypharmacy presents many challenges to patient medication self-management. This study aims to explore the self-management processes of medication in polypharmacy from the perspectives of both patients and healthcare providers, which can help identify barriers and facilitators to effective management.Methods: A systematic review of qualitative studies was performed by searching seven databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and MEDLINE, from their establishment until August 2024. The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) tool was employed to evaluate the quality of the studies included. The extracted data were then analysed thematically and integrated into The Taxonomy of Everyday Self-management Strategies (TEDSS) framework.Results: A total of 16 studies were included, involving 403 patients and 119 healthcare providers. Patient management measures were mapped into TEDSS framework, including categories such as medical management, support-oriented domains and emotional and role management.Conclusion: Enhancing patients’ proactive health awareness, improving medication literacy, balancing lifestyle adjustments with medication therapy, dynamically reviewing and optimizing medications, strengthening patients’ social support networks, and helping patients integrate medication management into their daily life are the key elements that can effectively assist patients in self-managing their medications. Future interventions to improve patient medication self-management ability should be designed for these issues.Systematic Review Registration:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42024524742.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Pharmacology
Frontiers in Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.90%
发文量
5163
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Pharmacology is a leading journal in its field, publishing rigorously peer-reviewed research across disciplines, including basic and clinical pharmacology, medicinal chemistry, pharmacy and toxicology. Field Chief Editor Heike Wulff at UC Davis is supported by an outstanding Editorial Board of international researchers. This multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信