{"title":"实现语义通信与比特通信共存的速率分割多路访问","authors":"Yuanwen Liu, Bruno Clerckx","doi":"arxiv-2409.10314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the sixth generation (6G) of cellular networks, the demands for capacity\nand connectivity will increase dramatically to meet the requirements of\nemerging services for both humans and machines. Semantic communication has\nshown great potential because of its efficiency, and suitability for users who\nonly care about the semantic meaning. But bit communication is still needed for\nusers requiring original messages. Therefore, there will be a coexistence of\nsemantic and bit communications in future networks. This motivates us to\nexplore how to allocate resources in such a coexistence scenario. We\ninvestigate different uplink multiple access (MA) schemes for the coexistence\nof semantic users and a bit user, namely orthogonal multiple access (OMA),\nnon-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and rate-splitting multiple access\n(RSMA). We characterize the rate regions achieved by those MA schemes. The\nsimulation results show that RSMA always outperforms NOMA and has better\nperformance in high semantic rate regimes compared to OMA. We find that RSMA\nscheme design, rate region, and power allocation are quite different in the\ncoexistence scenario compared to the bit-only communication, primarily due to\nthe need to consider the understandability in semantic communications.\nInterestingly, in contrast to bit-only communications where RSMA is capacity\nachieving without any need for time sharing, in the coexistence scenario, time\nsharing helps enlarging RSMA rate region.","PeriodicalId":501034,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - EE - Signal Processing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rate-Splitting Multiple Access for Coexistence of Semantic and Bit Communications\",\"authors\":\"Yuanwen Liu, Bruno Clerckx\",\"doi\":\"arxiv-2409.10314\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the sixth generation (6G) of cellular networks, the demands for capacity\\nand connectivity will increase dramatically to meet the requirements of\\nemerging services for both humans and machines. Semantic communication has\\nshown great potential because of its efficiency, and suitability for users who\\nonly care about the semantic meaning. But bit communication is still needed for\\nusers requiring original messages. Therefore, there will be a coexistence of\\nsemantic and bit communications in future networks. This motivates us to\\nexplore how to allocate resources in such a coexistence scenario. We\\ninvestigate different uplink multiple access (MA) schemes for the coexistence\\nof semantic users and a bit user, namely orthogonal multiple access (OMA),\\nnon-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and rate-splitting multiple access\\n(RSMA). We characterize the rate regions achieved by those MA schemes. The\\nsimulation results show that RSMA always outperforms NOMA and has better\\nperformance in high semantic rate regimes compared to OMA. We find that RSMA\\nscheme design, rate region, and power allocation are quite different in the\\ncoexistence scenario compared to the bit-only communication, primarily due to\\nthe need to consider the understandability in semantic communications.\\nInterestingly, in contrast to bit-only communications where RSMA is capacity\\nachieving without any need for time sharing, in the coexistence scenario, time\\nsharing helps enlarging RSMA rate region.\",\"PeriodicalId\":501034,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"arXiv - EE - Signal Processing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"arXiv - EE - Signal Processing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10314\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - EE - Signal Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2409.10314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在第六代(6G)蜂窝网络中,对容量和连接性的要求将急剧增加,以满足人类和机器对新兴服务的需求。语义通信因其效率高、适合只关心语义的用户而显示出巨大的潜力。但是,需要原始信息的用户仍然需要比特通信。因此,在未来的网络中,语义通信和比特通信将并存。这促使我们探索如何在这种共存情况下分配资源。我们研究了语义用户和比特用户共存时的不同上行链路多址接入(MA)方案,即正交多址接入(OMA)、非正交多址接入(NOMA)和速率分割多址接入(RSMA)。我们描述了这些多址接入方案实现的速率区域。仿真结果表明,RSMA 的性能始终优于 NOMA,而且与 OMA 相比,RSMA 在高语义速率区的性能更好。我们发现,在共存场景中,RSMA 方案的设计、速率区域和功率分配与纯比特通信相比有很大不同,这主要是由于需要考虑语义通信中的可理解性。有趣的是,在纯比特通信中,RSMA 无需分时即可实现容量,而在共存场景中,分时有助于扩大 RSMA 的速率区域。
Rate-Splitting Multiple Access for Coexistence of Semantic and Bit Communications
In the sixth generation (6G) of cellular networks, the demands for capacity
and connectivity will increase dramatically to meet the requirements of
emerging services for both humans and machines. Semantic communication has
shown great potential because of its efficiency, and suitability for users who
only care about the semantic meaning. But bit communication is still needed for
users requiring original messages. Therefore, there will be a coexistence of
semantic and bit communications in future networks. This motivates us to
explore how to allocate resources in such a coexistence scenario. We
investigate different uplink multiple access (MA) schemes for the coexistence
of semantic users and a bit user, namely orthogonal multiple access (OMA),
non-orthogonal multiple access (NOMA) and rate-splitting multiple access
(RSMA). We characterize the rate regions achieved by those MA schemes. The
simulation results show that RSMA always outperforms NOMA and has better
performance in high semantic rate regimes compared to OMA. We find that RSMA
scheme design, rate region, and power allocation are quite different in the
coexistence scenario compared to the bit-only communication, primarily due to
the need to consider the understandability in semantic communications.
Interestingly, in contrast to bit-only communications where RSMA is capacity
achieving without any need for time sharing, in the coexistence scenario, time
sharing helps enlarging RSMA rate region.